Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 97.6% → 100.0%

Time: 3.8s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.3×

• 20.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (- y z) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (y - z), z);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(y - z), z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

   5. +-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

   6. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   7. neg-mul-1 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   8. associate-*r* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   9. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 60.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{+143}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-85}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+103} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+186}\right) \land x \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* z (- x))))
   (if (<= x -9.8e+143)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= x -2.45e+47)
       t_0
       (if (<= x -2.8e-8)
         (* x y)
         (if (<= x 1.95e-85)
           z
           (if (or (<= x 1.55e+103)
                   (and (not (<= x 2.15e+186)) (<= x 3.8e+306)))
             (* x y)
             t_0)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * -x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -9.8e+143) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -2.45e+47) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= -2.8e-8) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.95e-85) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if ((x <= 1.55e+103) || (!(x <= 2.15e+186) && (x <= 3.8e+306))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z * -x
    if (x <= (-9.8d+143)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= (-2.45d+47)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= (-2.8d-8)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 1.95d-85) then
        tmp = z
    else if ((x <= 1.55d+103) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.15d+186)) .and. (x <= 3.8d+306)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * -x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -9.8e+143) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -2.45e+47) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= -2.8e-8) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.95e-85) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if ((x <= 1.55e+103) || (!(x <= 2.15e+186) && (x <= 3.8e+306))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z * -x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -9.8e+143:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= -2.45e+47:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= -2.8e-8:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 1.95e-85:
		tmp = z
	elif (x <= 1.55e+103) or (not (x <= 2.15e+186) and (x <= 3.8e+306)):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z * Float64(-x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -9.8e+143)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= -2.45e+47)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= -2.8e-8)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 1.95e-85)
		tmp = z;
	elseif ((x <= 1.55e+103) || (!(x <= 2.15e+186) && (x <= 3.8e+306)))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z * -x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -9.8e+143)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= -2.45e+47)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= -2.8e-8)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 1.95e-85)
		tmp = z;
	elseif ((x <= 1.55e+103) || (~((x <= 2.15e+186)) && (x <= 3.8e+306)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -9.8e+143], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -2.45e+47], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, -2.8e-8], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.95e-85], z, If[Or[LessEqual[x, 1.55e+103], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.15e+186]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 3.8e+306]]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -9.79999999999999971e143 or -2.4500000000000001e47 < x < -2.7999999999999999e-8 or 1.94999999999999994e-85 < x < 1.5500000000000001e103 or 2.15e186 < x < 3.79999999999999985e306

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -9.79999999999999971e143 < x < -2.4500000000000001e47 or 1.5500000000000001e103 < x < 2.15e186 or 3.79999999999999985e306 < x

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z \cdot x} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -2.7999999999999999e-8 < x < 1.94999999999999994e-85

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{+143}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-85}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+103} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+186}\right) \land x \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 74.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-110} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.7e-110) (not (<= z 4e-9))) (* z (- 1.0 x)) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.7e-110) || !(z <= 4e-9)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.7d-110)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4d-9))) then
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - x)
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.7e-110) || !(z <= 4e-9)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.7e-110) or not (z <= 4e-9):
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x)
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.7e-110) || !(z <= 4e-9))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.7e-110) || ~((z <= 4e-9)))
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.7e-110], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4e-9]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.7000000000000001e-110 or 4.00000000000000025e-9 < z

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]

   if -1.7000000000000001e-110 < z < 4.00000000000000025e-9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-110} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 84.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.6e-7) (not (<= x 2.3e-60))) (* x (- y z)) (* z (- 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.6e-7) || !(x <= 2.3e-60)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.6d-7)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.3d-60))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.6e-7) || !(x <= 2.3e-60)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.6e-7) or not (x <= 2.3e-60):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.6e-7) || !(x <= 2.3e-60))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.6e-7) || ~((x <= 2.3e-60)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.6e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.3e-60]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.59999999999999999e-7 or 2.3000000000000001e-60 < x

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 96.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -2.59999999999999999e-7 < x < 2.3000000000000001e-60

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-60}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1550000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1550000000.0) (not (<= x 6.4e-5)))
   (* x (- y z))
   (+ z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1550000000.0) || !(x <= 6.4e-5)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1550000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.4d-5))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1550000000.0) || !(x <= 6.4e-5)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1550000000.0) or not (x <= 6.4e-5):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1550000000.0) || !(x <= 6.4e-5))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1550000000.0) || ~((x <= 6.4e-5)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1550000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.4e-5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.55e9 or 6.39999999999999971e-5 < x

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 96.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.55e9 < x < 6.39999999999999971e-5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x + z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1550000000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 61.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-84}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.7e-9) (* x y) (if (<= x 1.2e-84) z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.7e-9) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.2e-84) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.7d-9)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 1.2d-84) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.7e-9) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.2e-84) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.7e-9:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 1.2e-84:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.7e-9)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 1.2e-84)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.7e-9)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 1.2e-84)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.7e-9], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.2e-84], z, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.6999999999999999e-9 or 1.20000000000000009e-84 < x

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.6999999999999999e-9 < x < 1.20000000000000009e-84

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-84}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x * (y - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x * (y - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x * Float64(y - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x * (y - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

   5. +-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

   6. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   7. neg-mul-1 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   8. associate-*r* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   9. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x + z} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \]

Alternative 8: 36.3% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

3. Final simplification 35.4%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023258 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))