HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta

Percentage Accurate: 99.5% → 99.5%

Time: 14.1s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

\[\left(10^{-5} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq v \land v \leq 109.746574\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end

Initial Program: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (exp (+ (/ -2.0 v) (log1p (- u)))))))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + expf(((-2.0f / v) + log1pf(-u))))));
}

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + exp(Float32(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v) + log1p(Float32(-u))))))))
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-exp-log 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   3. log-prod 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + \log \left(1 - u\right)}}\right) \]

   4. add-log-exp 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{v}} + \log \left(1 - u\right)}\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   6. log1p-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (fma (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v)) u)))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf(fmaf((1.0f - u), expf((-2.0f / v)), u)));
}

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(fma(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u), exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)), u))))
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right) \cdot v} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} \]

4. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} - u}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (exp (- (/ -2.0 v) u)))))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + expf(((-2.0f / v) - u)))));
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + exp((((-2.0e0) / v) - u)))))
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + exp(Float32(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v) - u))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + exp(((single(-2.0) / v) - u)))));
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-exp-log 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   3. log-prod 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + \log \left(1 - u\right)}}\right) \]

   4. add-log-exp 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{v}} + \log \left(1 - u\right)}\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   6. log1p-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 98.4%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot u}}\right) \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 98.4%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \color{blue}{\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

6. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \color{blue}{\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unsub-neg 98.4%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{v} - u}}\right) \]

   2. exp-diff 98.4%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{e^{u}}}\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 98.4%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{e^{u}}}\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. div-exp 98.4%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\frac{-2}{v} - u}}\right) \]

10. Simplified 98.4%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\frac{-2}{v} - u}}\right) \]

11. Final simplification 98.4%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} - u}\right) \]

Alternative 5: 96.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (exp (/ -2.0 v)))))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + expf((-2.0f / v)))));
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + exp(((-2.0e0) / v)))))
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + exp((single(-2.0) / v)))));
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 96.8%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}\right) \]

3. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 94.4% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log u \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 (+ 1.0 (* v (log u))))

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf(u));
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log(u))
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(u)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log(u));
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-exp-log 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   3. log-prod 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + \log \left(1 - u\right)}}\right) \]

   4. add-log-exp 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{v}} + \log \left(1 - u\right)}\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   6. log1p-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

4. Taylor expanded in u around inf 95.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + -1 \cdot \left(v \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u}\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(-v \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u}\right)\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - v \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u}\right)} \]

   3. log-rec 95.3%

      \[\leadsto 1 - v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log u\right)} \]

6. Simplified 95.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - v \cdot \left(-\log u\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 95.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + v \cdot \log u} \]

8. Final simplification 95.3%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log u \]

Alternative 7: 5.9% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 -1.0)

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return -1.0f;
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0e0
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(-1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(-1.0);
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 5.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

3. Final simplification 5.5%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]

Alternative 8: 86.5% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 1.0)

C

float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f;
}

Fortran

real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0
end function

Julia

function code(u, v)
	return Float32(1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0);
end

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-exp-log 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   3. log-prod 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + \log \left(1 - u\right)}}\right) \]

   4. add-log-exp 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{v}} + \log \left(1 - u\right)}\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-u\right)\right)}}\right) \]

   6. log1p-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \color{blue}{e^{\frac{-2}{v} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-u\right)}}\right) \]

4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 88.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

5. Final simplification 88.4%

   \[\leadsto 1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023257 
(FPCore (u v)
  :name "HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 1e-5 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 v) (<= v 109.746574)))
  (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))