math.log10 on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 51.6% → 99.7%

Time: 9.4s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log 10.0)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.log(Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / Math.log(10.0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.log(math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / math.log(10.0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(log(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))) / log(10.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 51.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log 10.0)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.log(Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / Math.log(10.0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.log(math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / math.log(10.0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(log(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))) / log(10.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = log(sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))) / log(10.0);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left({\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}}\right)}^{2}\right)}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (log (pow (hypot re im) (pow (/ 1.0 (sqrt (log 10.0))) 2.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return log(pow(hypot(re, im), pow((1.0 / sqrt(log(10.0))), 2.0)));
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.log(Math.pow(Math.hypot(re, im), Math.pow((1.0 / Math.sqrt(Math.log(10.0))), 2.0)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.log(math.pow(math.hypot(re, im), math.pow((1.0 / math.sqrt(math.log(10.0))), 2.0)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return log((hypot(re, im) ^ (Float64(1.0 / sqrt(log(10.0))) ^ 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = log((hypot(re, im) ^ ((1.0 / sqrt(log(10.0))) ^ 2.0)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[Log[N[Power[N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 48.8%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log 10} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10}}\right)} \]

   2. div-inv 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\log 10}}}\right) \]

   3. exp-to-pow 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{1}{\log 10}\right)}\right)} \]

   4. frac-2neg 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{-\log 10}\right)}}\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{-\log 10}\right)}\right) \]

   6. neg-log 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{10}\right)}}\right)}\right) \]

   7. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{\log \color{blue}{0.1}}\right)}\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{\log 0.1}\right)}\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{\log 0.1}\right)}\right) \]

   2. metadata-eval 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{10}\right)}}\right)}\right) \]

   3. neg-log 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{\color{blue}{-\log 10}}\right)}\right) \]

   4. frac-2neg 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\log 10}\right)}}\right) \]

   5. add-sqr-sqrt 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{\log 10}} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{\log 10}}\right)}}\right) \]

   6. sqrt-div 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{\log 10}}} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{\log 10}}\right)}\right) \]

   7. metadata-eval 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{\log 10}}\right)}\right) \]

   8. sqrt-div 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{\log 10}}}\right)}\right) \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\sqrt{\log 10}}\right)}\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}}\right)}}\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left({\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}}\right)}^{2}\right)}}\right) \]

9. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left({\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}}\right)}^{2}\right)}}\right) \]

10. Final simplification 99.7%

    \[\leadsto \log \left({\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}^{\left({\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\log 10}}\right)}^{2}\right)}\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(\frac{\log 10}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (pow (/ (log 10.0) (log (hypot re im))) -1.0))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return pow((log(10.0) / log(hypot(re, im))), -1.0);
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.pow((Math.log(10.0) / Math.log(Math.hypot(re, im))), -1.0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.pow((math.log(10.0) / math.log(math.hypot(re, im))), -1.0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(log(10.0) / log(hypot(re, im))) ^ -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = (log(10.0) / log(hypot(re, im))) ^ -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[Power[N[(N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 48.8%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log 10} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\log 10}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}} \]

   2. inv-pow 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\log 10}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\log 10}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

6. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\log 10}{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1} \]

Alternative 3: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (/ (log (hypot re im)) (log 10.0)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return log(hypot(re, im)) / log(10.0);
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.log(Math.hypot(re, im)) / Math.log(10.0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.log(math.hypot(re, im)) / math.log(10.0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(log(hypot(re, im)) / log(10.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = log(hypot(re, im)) / log(10.0);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Log[N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 48.8%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log 10} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10}} \]

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10} \]

Alternative 4: 27.6% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{\frac{\log 10}{\log im}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (/ (log 10.0) (log im))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 / (log(10.0) / log(im));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0 / (log(10.0d0) / log(im))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 / (Math.log(10.0) / Math.log(im));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0 / (math.log(10.0) / math.log(im))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(log(10.0) / log(im)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0 / (log(10.0) / log(im));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(1.0 / N[(N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 48.8%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log 10} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log im}{\log 10}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 27.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\log 10}{\log im}}} \]

   2. inv-pow 27.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\log 10}{\log im}\right)}^{-1}} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\log 10}{\log im}\right)}^{-1}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow-1 27.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\log 10}{\log im}}} \]

8. Simplified 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\log 10}{\log im}}} \]

9. Final simplification 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\log 10}{\log im}} \]

Alternative 5: 27.6% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\log im}{\log 10} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (/ (log im) (log 10.0)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return log(im) / log(10.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = log(im) / log(10.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.log(im) / Math.log(10.0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.log(im) / math.log(10.0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(log(im) / log(10.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = log(im) / log(10.0);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Log[im], $MachinePrecision] / N[Log[10.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 48.8%

   \[\frac{\log \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}{\log 10} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}}{\log 10} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}{\log 10}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log im}{\log 10}} \]

5. Final simplification 27.7%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\log im}{\log 10} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023257 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.log10 on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (log (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))) (log 10.0)))