Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutX from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 6.7s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.sin(y)) + (z * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.sin(y)) + (z * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * sin(y)) + Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.sin(y)) + (z * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.sin(y)) + (z * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * sin(y)) + Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \sin y, z \cdot \cos y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (sin y) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, sin(y), (z * cos(y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, sin(y), Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \sin y, z \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \sin y, z \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \sin y, z \cdot \cos y\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.sin(y)) + (z * Math.cos(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.sin(y)) + (z * math.cos(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * sin(y)) + Float64(z * cos(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * sin(y)) + (z * cos(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]

2. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]

Alternative 3: 86.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+87} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+92}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.05e+87) (not (<= z 2.25e+92)))
   (* z (cos y))
   (+ z (* x (sin y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+87) || !(z <= 2.25e+92)) {
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * sin(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.05d+87)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.25d+92))) then
        tmp = z * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * sin(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+87) || !(z <= 2.25e+92)) {
		tmp = z * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * Math.sin(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.05e+87) or not (z <= 2.25e+92):
		tmp = z * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * math.sin(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.05e+87) || !(z <= 2.25e+92))
		tmp = Float64(z * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * sin(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+87) || ~((z <= 2.25e+92)))
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * sin(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.05e+87], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.25e+92]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.05e87 or 2.25e92 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + x \cdot \sin y} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + x \cdot \sin y \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.05e87 < z < 2.25e92

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \sin y + \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+87} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+92}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \sin y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 75.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.054 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.0004\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.054) (not (<= y 0.0004))) (* z (cos y)) (+ z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.054) || !(y <= 0.0004)) {
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-0.054d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.0004d0))) then
        tmp = z * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.054) || !(y <= 0.0004)) {
		tmp = z * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -0.054) or not (y <= 0.0004):
		tmp = z * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.054) || !(y <= 0.0004))
		tmp = Float64(z * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -0.054) || ~((y <= 0.0004)))
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.054], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.0004]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.0539999999999999994 or 4.00000000000000019e-4 < y

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + x \cdot \sin y} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + x \cdot \sin y \]

      3. fma-def 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} \]

   if -0.0539999999999999994 < y < 4.00000000000000019e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.054 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.0004\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 73.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 420000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -7.2e+116) (not (<= x 420000000.0)))
   (* x (sin y))
   (* z (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.2e+116) || !(x <= 420000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-7.2d+116)) .or. (.not. (x <= 420000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * sin(y)
    else
        tmp = z * cos(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -7.2e+116) || !(x <= 420000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * Math.sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * Math.cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -7.2e+116) or not (x <= 420000000.0):
		tmp = x * math.sin(y)
	else:
		tmp = z * math.cos(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -7.2e+116) || !(x <= 420000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * sin(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * cos(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -7.2e+116) || ~((x <= 420000000.0)))
		tmp = x * sin(y);
	else
		tmp = z * cos(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -7.2e+116], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 420000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.19999999999999941e116 or 4.2e8 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + x \cdot \sin y} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + x \cdot \sin y \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y \cdot x} \]

   if -7.19999999999999941e116 < x < 4.2e8

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + x \cdot \sin y} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + x \cdot \sin y \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{+116} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 420000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 41.9% accurate, 22.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+123}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -4e+117)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= x 6.2e+123) z (if (<= x 7.6e+306) (* x y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4e+117) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 6.2e+123) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 7.6e+306) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4d+117)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 6.2d+123) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= 7.6d+306) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4e+117) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 6.2e+123) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 7.6e+306) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4e+117:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 6.2e+123:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= 7.6e+306:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4e+117)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 6.2e+123)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 7.6e+306)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4e+117)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 6.2e+123)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 7.6e+306)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4e+117], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 6.2e+123], z, If[LessEqual[x, 7.6e+306], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], z]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.0000000000000002e117 or 6.20000000000000013e123 < x < 7.59999999999999969e306

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + x \cdot \sin y} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + x \cdot \sin y \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 39.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -4.0000000000000002e117 < x < 6.20000000000000013e123 or 7.59999999999999969e306 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + x \cdot \sin y} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + x \cdot \sin y \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+123}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 52.7% accurate, 41.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 53.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + z} \]

3. Final simplification 53.6%

   \[\leadsto z + x \cdot y \]

Alternative 8: 39.1% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \sin y + z \cdot \cos y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \cos y + x \cdot \sin y} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos y \cdot z} + x \cdot \sin y \]

   3. fma-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos y, z, x \cdot \sin y\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 39.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 39.1%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023257 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutX from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (sin y)) (* z (cos y))))