Data.HashTable.ST.Basic:computeOverhead from hashtables-1.2.0.2

Percentage Accurate: 86.4% → 99.1%

Time: 9.7s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.3×

• 23.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + ((z * 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 - t))) / (t * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * Float64(1.0 - t))) / Float64(t * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 86.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + ((z * 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 - t))) / (t * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * Float64(1.0 - t))) / Float64(t * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (/ x y) (+ -2.0 (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + (-2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x / y) + ((-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + (-2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x / y) + (-2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.5%

   \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   3. *-lft-identity 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   6. div-sub 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

   7. associate-*r* 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   8. associate-*l/ 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

   9. *-inverses 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

   10. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

   11. sub-neg 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

   12. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   13. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

   14. +-commutative 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

   15. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right) \]

Alternative 2: 92.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -9.4 \cdot 10^{+30} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 0.00195\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -9.4e+30) (not (<= (/ x y) 0.00195)))
   (+ (/ x y) (/ 2.0 (* z t)))
   (+ -2.0 (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -9.4e+30) || !((x / y) <= 0.00195)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-9.4d+30)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 0.00195d0))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 / (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -9.4e+30) || !((x / y) <= 0.00195)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -9.4e+30) or not ((x / y) <= 0.00195):
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -9.4e+30) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 0.00195))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -9.4e+30) || ~(((x / y) <= 0.00195)))
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	else
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -9.4e+30], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 0.00195]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -9.39999999999999979e30 or 0.0019499999999999999 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -9.39999999999999979e30 < (/.f64 x y) < 0.0019499999999999999

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}}}\right) \]

      2. pow3 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{1}^{0.3333333333333333} \cdot \frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} - 2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{1}^{0.3333333333333333} \cdot \frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \left(-2\right)} \]

      2. pow-base-1 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)}{t}} + \left(-2\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 \cdot \left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}\right)}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 \cdot \left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}\right)}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      6. *-lft-identity 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 + \frac{2}{z}}}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]

   8. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -9.4 \cdot 10^{+30} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 0.00195\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.0) (not (<= z 7e-6)))
   (+ (/ x y) (- (/ 2.0 t) 2.0))
   (+ (/ x y) (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 (* z t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 7e-6)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 7d-6))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 / t) - 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (x / y) + ((-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / (z * t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 7e-6)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.0) or not (z <= 7e-6):
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 7e-6))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) - 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || ~((z <= 7e-6)))
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 7e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1 or 6.99999999999999989e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 78.2%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) - 2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} - 2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)} \]

   if -1 < z < 6.99999999999999989e-6

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 69.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+69}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x y) -6.2e+69)
   (/ x y)
   (if (<= (/ x y) 1e+93) (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 (* z t))) (- (/ x y) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -6.2e+69) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1e+93) {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x / y) <= (-6.2d+69)) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if ((x / y) <= 1d+93) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -6.2e+69) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1e+93) {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -6.2e+69:
		tmp = x / y
	elif (x / y) <= 1e+93:
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -6.2e+69)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 1e+93)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -6.2e+69)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 1e+93)
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -6.2e+69], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+93], N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -6.1999999999999997e69

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -6.1999999999999997e69 < (/.f64 x y) < 1.00000000000000004e93

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}}\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} - 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t \cdot z}} + \left(-2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}} + \left(-2\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{z \cdot t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]

      6. +-commutative 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}} \]

      7. *-commutative 72.2%

         \[\leadsto -2 + \frac{2}{\color{blue}{t \cdot z}} \]

   7. Simplified 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 + \frac{2}{t \cdot z}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000004e93 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+69}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 81.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -18000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-73}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -18000000000.0) (not (<= t 4.4e-73)))
   (+ (/ x y) (- (/ 2.0 t) 2.0))
   (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 4.4e-73)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-18000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 4.4d-73))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 / t) - 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 4.4e-73)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -18000000000.0) or not (t <= 4.4e-73):
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 4.4e-73))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) - 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || ~((t <= 4.4e-73)))
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -18000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 4.4e-73]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.8e10 or 4.4e-73 < t

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) - 2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} - 2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)} \]

   if -1.8e10 < t < 4.4e-73

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{1}{y}} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right) \]

      2. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, -2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + -2}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + -2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 83.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      2. metadata-eval 83.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   8. Simplified 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -18000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-73}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 92.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{-12} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -9.6e-12) (not (<= z 5.6e-6)))
   (+ (/ x y) (- (/ 2.0 t) 2.0))
   (+ (/ x y) (/ 2.0 (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9.6e-12) || !(z <= 5.6e-6)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-9.6d-12)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.6d-6))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 / t) - 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (x / y) + (2.0d0 / (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9.6e-12) || !(z <= 5.6e-6)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -9.6e-12) or not (z <= 5.6e-6):
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -9.6e-12) || !(z <= 5.6e-6))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) - 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -9.6e-12) || ~((z <= 5.6e-6)))
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = (x / y) + (2.0 / (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -9.6e-12], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.6e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9.59999999999999948e-12 or 5.59999999999999975e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 78.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) - 2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} - 2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)} \]

   if -9.59999999999999948e-12 < z < 5.59999999999999975e-6

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{-12} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 64.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 0.00195:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x y) -4e+31)
   (/ x y)
   (if (<= (/ x y) 0.00195) (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t)) (/ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -4e+31) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 0.00195) {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x / y) <= (-4d+31)) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if ((x / y) <= 0.00195d0) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / t)
    else
        tmp = x / y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -4e+31) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 0.00195) {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -4e+31:
		tmp = x / y
	elif (x / y) <= 0.00195:
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t)
	else:
		tmp = x / y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -4e+31)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 0.00195)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -4e+31)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 0.00195)
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	else
		tmp = x / y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -4e+31], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 0.00195], N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -3.9999999999999999e31 or 0.0019499999999999999 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -3.9999999999999999e31 < (/.f64 x y) < 0.0019499999999999999

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) - 2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} - 2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \left(-2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + \left(-2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]

   9. Simplified 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} + -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 0.00195:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 64.3% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x y) -6.5e+27)
   (/ x y)
   (if (<= (/ x y) 2.3e-6) (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t)) (- (/ x y) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -6.5e+27) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 2.3e-6) {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x / y) <= (-6.5d+27)) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if ((x / y) <= 2.3d-6) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / t)
    else
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -6.5e+27) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 2.3e-6) {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -6.5e+27:
		tmp = x / y
	elif (x / y) <= 2.3e-6:
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t)
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -6.5e+27)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 2.3e-6)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -6.5e+27)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 2.3e-6)
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	else
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -6.5e+27], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 2.3e-6], N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -6.5000000000000005e27

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -6.5000000000000005e27 < (/.f64 x y) < 2.3e-6

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) - 2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} - 2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \left(-2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + \left(-2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]

   9. Simplified 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} + -2} \]

   if 2.3e-6 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 79.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -18000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -18000000000.0) (not (<= t 9.2e-64)))
   (- (/ x y) 2.0)
   (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 9.2e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-18000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 9.2d-64))) then
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 9.2e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -18000000000.0) or not (t <= 9.2e-64):
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 9.2e-64))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || ~((t <= 9.2e-64)))
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -18000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 9.2e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.8e10 or 9.2000000000000006e-64 < t

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -1.8e10 < t < 9.2000000000000006e-64

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{1}{y}} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right) \]

      2. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, -2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + -2}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + -2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 83.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      2. metadata-eval 83.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   8. Simplified 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -18000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 46.5% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 0.00195:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x y) -7.8e+32)
   (/ x y)
   (if (<= (/ x y) 0.00195) (/ 2.0 t) (/ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -7.8e+32) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 0.00195) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x / y) <= (-7.8d+32)) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if ((x / y) <= 0.00195d0) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / t
    else
        tmp = x / y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -7.8e+32) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 0.00195) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -7.8e+32:
		tmp = x / y
	elif (x / y) <= 0.00195:
		tmp = 2.0 / t
	else:
		tmp = x / y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -7.8e+32)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 0.00195)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -7.8e+32)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 0.00195)
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	else
		tmp = x / y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -7.8e+32], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 0.00195], N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -7.7999999999999998e32 or 0.0019499999999999999 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -7.7999999999999998e32 < (/.f64 x y) < 0.0019499999999999999

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) - 2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} - 2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} - 2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in t around 0 26.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 0.00195:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 63.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -18000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -18000000000.0) (not (<= t 6.2e-64)))
   (- (/ x y) 2.0)
   (/ 2.0 (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 6.2e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-18000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 6.2d-64))) then
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 / (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 6.2e-64)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -18000000000.0) or not (t <= 6.2e-64):
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || !(t <= 6.2e-64))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -18000000000.0) || ~((t <= 6.2e-64)))
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 / (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -18000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 6.2e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 / N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.8e10 or 6.20000000000000049e-64 < t

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -1.8e10 < t < 6.20000000000000049e-64

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{1}{y}} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right) \]

      2. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, -2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + -2}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{1}{y}, \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} + -2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -18000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{z \cdot t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 63.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -38000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -38000000000.0) (not (<= t 7.2e-66)))
   (- (/ x y) 2.0)
   (/ (/ 2.0 z) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -38000000000.0) || !(t <= 7.2e-66)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / z) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-38000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (t <= 7.2d-66))) then
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / z) / t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -38000000000.0) || !(t <= 7.2e-66)) {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / z) / t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -38000000000.0) or not (t <= 7.2e-66):
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / z) / t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -38000000000.0) || !(t <= 7.2e-66))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -38000000000.0) || ~((t <= 7.2e-66)))
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / z) / t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -38000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 7.2e-66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -3.8e10 or 7.20000000000000025e-66 < t

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      3. *-lft-identity 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

      6. div-sub 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      8. associate-*l/ 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

      9. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

      12. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

      14. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -3.8e10 < t < 7.20000000000000025e-66

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      4. distribute-rgt1-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      6. times-frac 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1}{z} \cdot \frac{2}{t}} + \frac{x}{y} \]

      7. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1}{z}, \frac{2}{t}, \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - t\right)} + 1}{z}, \frac{2}{t}, \frac{x}{y}\right) \]

      9. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right)}}{z}, \frac{2}{t}, \frac{x}{y}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right)}{z}, \frac{2}{t}, \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 + z}{t \cdot z}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l/ 53.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 53.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 53.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]

      2. div-inv 53.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}}}{t} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -38000000000 \lor \neg \left(t \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 19.8% accurate, 5.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (/ 2.0 t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 2.0 / t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 2.0d0 / t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 2.0 / t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return 2.0 / t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(2.0 / t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 2.0 / t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.5%

   \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   3. *-lft-identity 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)\right)}{t \cdot z} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 + z \cdot 2\right) - t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} \]

   6. div-sub 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

   7. associate-*r* 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   8. associate-*l/ 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{\frac{t \cdot z}{t \cdot z} \cdot 2}\right) \]

   9. *-inverses 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot 2\right) \]

   10. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} - \color{blue}{2}\right) \]

   11. sub-neg 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

   12. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   13. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot -1}\right) \]

   14. +-commutative 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot -1 + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right)} \]

   15. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   16. associate-/l/ 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2 + z \cdot 2}{z}}{t}}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) - 2} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2\right)} \]

   2. associate-*r/ 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} - 2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} - 2\right) \]

6. Simplified 69.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} - 2\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in t around 0 17.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}} \]

8. Final simplification 17.7%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{t} \]

Developer target: 99.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{2}{z} + 2}{t} - \left(2 - \frac{x}{y}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (/ (+ (/ 2.0 z) 2.0) t) (- 2.0 (/ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((2.0d0 / z) + 2.0d0) / t) - (2.0d0 - (x / y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - Float64(2.0 - Float64(x / y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(2.0 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023257 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Data.HashTable.ST.Basic:computeOverhead from hashtables-1.2.0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (/ (+ (/ 2.0 z) 2.0) t) (- 2.0 (/ x y)))

  (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))