System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.2s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 85.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-66} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot 0.5 \leq 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x 0.5) -1e-66) (not (<= (* x 0.5) 1e-26)))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))
   (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -1e-66) || !((x * 0.5) <= 1e-26)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * 0.5d0) <= (-1d-66)) .or. (.not. ((x * 0.5d0) <= 1d-26))) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    else
        tmp = y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -1e-66) || !((x * 0.5) <= 1e-26)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * 0.5) <= -1e-66) or not ((x * 0.5) <= 1e-26):
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * 0.5) <= -1e-66) || !(Float64(x * 0.5) <= 1e-26))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -1e-66) || ~(((x * 0.5) <= 1e-26)))
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	else
		tmp = y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -1e-66], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 1e-26]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x 1/2) < -9.9999999999999998e-67 or 1e-26 < (*.f64 x 1/2)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 85.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 85.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999998e-67 < (*.f64 x 1/2) < 1e-26

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\log z + 1\right)} - z\right) \]

      2. associate--l+ 91.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-66} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot 0.5 \leq 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 74.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-199} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-155} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-107}\right) \land z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z 1.9e-199)
         (not
          (or (<= z 1.35e-155) (and (not (<= z 1.5e-107)) (<= z 3.8e-31)))))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))
   (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 1.9e-199) || !((z <= 1.35e-155) || (!(z <= 1.5e-107) && (z <= 3.8e-31)))) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= 1.9d-199) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.35d-155) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.5d-107)) .and. (z <= 3.8d-31))) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 + log(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 1.9e-199) || !((z <= 1.35e-155) || (!(z <= 1.5e-107) && (z <= 3.8e-31)))) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + Math.log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= 1.9e-199) or not ((z <= 1.35e-155) or (not (z <= 1.5e-107) and (z <= 3.8e-31))):
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 + math.log(z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= 1.9e-199) || !((z <= 1.35e-155) || (!(z <= 1.5e-107) && (z <= 3.8e-31))))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= 1.9e-199) || ~(((z <= 1.35e-155) || (~((z <= 1.5e-107)) && (z <= 3.8e-31)))))
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, 1.9e-199], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[z, 1.35e-155], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.5e-107]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[z, 3.8e-31]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.8999999999999999e-199 or 1.34999999999999991e-155 < z < 1.4999999999999999e-107 or 3.8e-31 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 84.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 84.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if 1.8999999999999999e-199 < z < 1.34999999999999991e-155 or 1.4999999999999999e-107 < z < 3.8e-31

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \log z + \left(0.5 \cdot x + y\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-199} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-155} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-107}\right) \land z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.27:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + \left(y + y \cdot \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.27) (+ (* x 0.5) (+ y (* y (log z)))) (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.27) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y + (y * log(z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 0.27d0) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) + (y + (y * log(z)))
    else
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.27) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y + (y * Math.log(z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 0.27:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y + (y * math.log(z)))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.27)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y + Float64(y * log(z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 0.27)
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y + (y * log(z)));
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.27], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y + N[(y * N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 0.27000000000000002

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \log z\right)} \]

      3. *-rgt-identity 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \log z\right) \]

   4. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y + y \cdot \log z\right)} \]

   if 0.27000000000000002 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.27:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + \left(y + y \cdot \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 74.8% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 73.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 73.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

4. Simplified 73.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 73.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \]

Alternative 6: 60.1% accurate, 18.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 1.3e+43) (* x 0.5) (* y (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.3e+43) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.3d+43) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = y * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.3e+43) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.3e+43:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = y * -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.3e+43)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.3e+43)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = y * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.3e+43], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.3000000000000001e43

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if 1.3000000000000001e43 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 80.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 39.4% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 36.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

3. Final simplification 36.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023255 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))