GTR1 distribution

?

Percentage Accurate: 98.5% → 98.7%
Time: 20.6s
Precision: binary32
Cost: 10272

?

\[\left(0 \leq cosTheta \land cosTheta \leq 1\right) \land \left(0.0001 \leq \alpha \land \alpha \leq 1\right)\]
\[\frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\left(\pi \cdot \log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]
↓
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \alpha \cdot \alpha + -1\\ \frac{t_0}{\log \left({\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)}^{\pi}\right) \cdot \left(1 + cosTheta \cdot \left(t_0 \cdot cosTheta\right)\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (cosTheta alpha)
 :precision binary32
 (/
  (- (* alpha alpha) 1.0)
  (*
   (* PI (log (* alpha alpha)))
   (+ 1.0 (* (* (- (* alpha alpha) 1.0) cosTheta) cosTheta)))))
↓
(FPCore (cosTheta alpha)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* alpha alpha) -1.0)))
   (/
    t_0
    (* (log (pow (* alpha alpha) PI)) (+ 1.0 (* cosTheta (* t_0 cosTheta)))))))
float code(float cosTheta, float alpha) {
	return ((alpha * alpha) - 1.0f) / ((((float) M_PI) * logf((alpha * alpha))) * (1.0f + ((((alpha * alpha) - 1.0f) * cosTheta) * cosTheta)));
}
↓
float code(float cosTheta, float alpha) {
	float t_0 = (alpha * alpha) + -1.0f;
	return t_0 / (logf(powf((alpha * alpha), ((float) M_PI))) * (1.0f + (cosTheta * (t_0 * cosTheta))));
}

function code(cosTheta, alpha)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(alpha * alpha) - Float32(1.0)) / Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * log(Float32(alpha * alpha))) * Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(alpha * alpha) - Float32(1.0)) * cosTheta) * cosTheta))))
end
↓
function code(cosTheta, alpha)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(alpha * alpha) + Float32(-1.0))
	return Float32(t_0 / Float32(log((Float32(alpha * alpha) ^ Float32(pi))) * Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(cosTheta * Float32(t_0 * cosTheta)))))
end

function tmp = code(cosTheta, alpha)
	tmp = ((alpha * alpha) - single(1.0)) / ((single(pi) * log((alpha * alpha))) * (single(1.0) + ((((alpha * alpha) - single(1.0)) * cosTheta) * cosTheta)));
end
↓
function tmp = code(cosTheta, alpha)
	t_0 = (alpha * alpha) + single(-1.0);
	tmp = t_0 / (log(((alpha * alpha) ^ single(pi))) * (single(1.0) + (cosTheta * (t_0 * cosTheta))));
end

\frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\left(\pi \cdot \log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)}
↓
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \alpha \cdot \alpha + -1\\
\frac{t_0}{\log \left({\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)}^{\pi}\right) \cdot \left(1 + cosTheta \cdot \left(t_0 \cdot cosTheta\right)\right)}
\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup

Accuracy vs Speed

The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Bogosity?

Bogosity

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Derivation?

  1. Initial program 98.5%

    \[\frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\left(\pi \cdot \log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]

  2. Applied egg-rr98.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\color{blue}{\log \left({\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)}^{\pi}\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]
    Step-by-step derivation

    [Start]98.5%

    \[ \frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\left(\pi \cdot \log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]

    add-log-exp [=>]98.5%

    \[ \frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\pi \cdot \log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)}\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]

    *-commutative [=>]98.5%

    \[ \frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right) \cdot \pi}}\right) \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]

    exp-to-pow [=>]98.8%

    \[ \frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1}{\log \color{blue}{\left({\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)}^{\pi}\right)} \cdot \left(1 + \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha - 1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]

  3. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha + -1}{\log \left({\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)}^{\pi}\right) \cdot \left(1 + cosTheta \cdot \left(\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha + -1\right) \cdot cosTheta\right)\right)} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy98.7%
Cost10272
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \alpha \cdot \alpha + -1\\ \frac{t_0}{\log \left({\left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)}^{\pi}\right) \cdot \left(1 + cosTheta \cdot \left(t_0 \cdot cosTheta\right)\right)} \end{array} \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy98.5%
Cost7104
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \alpha \cdot \alpha + -1\\ \frac{t_0}{\left(1 + cosTheta \cdot \left(t_0 \cdot cosTheta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)\right)} \end{array} \]
Alternative 3
Accuracy98.5%
Cost6912
\[\frac{\alpha \cdot \alpha + -1}{\left(\pi \cdot \log \left(\alpha \cdot \alpha\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - cosTheta \cdot cosTheta\right)} \]
Alternative 4
Accuracy66.8%
Cost6720
\[\frac{-0.5}{\left(1 - cosTheta \cdot cosTheta\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log \alpha\right)} \]
Alternative 5
Accuracy66.8%
Cost6720
\[\frac{\frac{-0.5}{\log \alpha \cdot \left(1 - cosTheta \cdot cosTheta\right)}}{\pi} \]
Alternative 6
Accuracy1.4%
Cost6656
\[\frac{0.5}{\log \alpha \cdot \left(cosTheta \cdot \left(\pi \cdot cosTheta\right)\right)} \]
Alternative 7
Accuracy1.4%
Cost6656
\[\frac{0.5}{\log \alpha \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(cosTheta \cdot cosTheta\right)\right)} \]
Alternative 8
Accuracy1.4%
Cost6656
\[\frac{0.5}{\pi \cdot \left(\log \alpha \cdot \left(cosTheta \cdot cosTheta\right)\right)} \]
Alternative 9
Accuracy-0.0%
Cost3904
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \alpha \cdot \alpha + -1\\ \frac{t_0}{\left(1 + cosTheta \cdot \left(t_0 \cdot cosTheta\right)\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \frac{0}{0}\right)} \end{array} \]

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023255 
(FPCore (cosTheta alpha)
  :name "GTR1 distribution"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 0.0 cosTheta) (<= cosTheta 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0001 alpha) (<= alpha 1.0)))
  (/ (- (* alpha alpha) 1.0) (* (* PI (log (* alpha alpha))) (+ 1.0 (* (* (- (* alpha alpha) 1.0) cosTheta) cosTheta)))))