Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.0%
Time: 11.6s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 24.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5 + \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (fma 4.0 (/ (+ (* (* u PI) -0.5) (* PI 0.25)) s) 1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(fmaf(4.0f, ((((u * ((float) M_PI)) * -0.5f) + (((float) M_PI) * 0.25f)) / s), 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(fma(Float32(4.0), Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(-0.5)) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25))) / s), Float32(1.0)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5 + \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. associate--r+24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(-0.25 - 0.25\right)} + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. *-commutative24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(-0.25 - 0.25\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-0.5} + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative24.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot 0.25}}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified24.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot -0.5 + \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  7. Final simplification24.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.5 + \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 11.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (+ (* (expm1 (log (+ 1.0 (* u PI)))) 0.5) (* PI -0.25))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((expm1f(logf((1.0f + (u * ((float) M_PI))))) * 0.5f) + (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(expm1(log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(pi))))) * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-udef10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \pi \cdot u\right)}\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    2. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \pi}\right)\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  10. Applied egg-rr10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  11. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]

Alternative 4: 11.5% accurate, 3.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \left(-1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (+ (* PI -0.25) (* 0.5 (+ 1.0 (+ -1.0 (* u PI)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + (0.5f * (1.0f + (-1.0f + (u * ((float) M_PI))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(0.5) * Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(pi)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + (single(0.5) * (single(1.0) + (single(-1.0) + (u * single(pi))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \left(-1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-udef10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} - 1\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    2. log1p-udef10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \pi \cdot u\right)}} - 1\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    3. add-exp-log10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \pi \cdot u\right)} - 1\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \pi}\right) - 1\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  10. Applied egg-rr10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right) - 1\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--l+10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(u \cdot \pi - 1\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    2. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot u} - 1\right)\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  12. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\pi \cdot u - 1\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  13. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \left(-1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 11.5% accurate, 3.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (+ (* PI -0.25) (* 0.5 (+ -1.0 (+ 1.0 (* u PI)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + (0.5f * (-1.0f + (1.0f + (u * ((float) M_PI))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(0.5) * Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(pi)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + (single(0.5) * (single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) + (u * single(pi))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-udef10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} - 1\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    2. log1p-udef10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \pi \cdot u\right)}} - 1\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    3. add-exp-log10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \pi \cdot u\right)} - 1\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\left(1 + \color{blue}{u \cdot \pi}\right) - 1\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  10. Applied egg-rr10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right) - 1\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  11. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 + u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 11.5% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (+ (* PI -0.25) (* (* u PI) 0.5))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + ((u * ((float) M_PI)) * 0.5f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(0.5))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + ((u * single(pi)) * single(0.5)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 7: 11.5% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ -0.25 (* u 0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (-0.25f + (u * 0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(-0.25) + (u * single(0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25} + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    2. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r*10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]
    5. distribute-lft-out10.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]
  9. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 11.3% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg10.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified10.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification10.4%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Alternative 9: 10.3% accurate, 243.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s 0.0))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = s * 0.0e0
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(0.0))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot 0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
  5. Final simplification10.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot 0 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023252 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))