Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 4.9s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot 0.99229} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x 0.99229))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * 0.99229d0))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * 0.99229))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * 0.99229), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.3%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{0.99229 \cdot x}} - x\right) \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]

4. Simplified 99.3%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]

5. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot 0.99229} - x\right) \]

Alternative 3: 98.2% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.05) (* x -0.70711) (if (<= x 1.15) 1.6316775383 (* x -0.70711))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.15) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.05d0)) then
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    else if (x <= 1.15d0) then
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0
    else
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.15) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.05:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	elif x <= 1.15:
		tmp = 1.6316775383
	else:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	elseif (x <= 1.15)
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	elseif (x <= 1.15)
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	else
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.05], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.15], 1.6316775383, N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.05000000000000004 or 1.1499999999999999 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   5. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   if -1.05000000000000004 < x < 1.1499999999999999

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 96.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2.30753 - x} \cdot \sqrt{2.30753 - x}\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 96.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2.30753 - x} \cdot \sqrt{2.30753 - x}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 97.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2.30753 - x\right)} \]

      2. flip-- 97.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{2.30753 \cdot 2.30753 - x \cdot x}{2.30753 + x}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.70711 \cdot \left(2.30753 \cdot 2.30753 - x \cdot x\right)}{2.30753 + x}} \]

      4. metadata-eval 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5.3246947009} - x \cdot x\right)}{2.30753 + x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.70711 \cdot \left(5.3246947009 - x \cdot x\right)}{2.30753 + x}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(5.3246947009 - x \cdot x\right) \cdot 0.70711}}{2.30753 + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5.3246947009 - x \cdot x}{\frac{2.30753 + x}{0.70711}}} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{5.3246947009 - x \cdot x}{\frac{\color{blue}{x + 2.30753}}{0.70711}} \]

   8. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5.3246947009 - x \cdot x}{\frac{x + 2.30753}{0.70711}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 97.7% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(2.30753 - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (* 0.70711 (- 2.30753 x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (2.30753d0 - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(2.30753 - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(2.30753 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]

3. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(2.30753 - x\right) \]

Alternative 5: 51.0% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1.6316775383 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 1.6316775383)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.6316775383d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.6316775383

Julia

function code(x)
	return 1.6316775383
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.6316775383;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 1.6316775383

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 72.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2.30753 - x} \cdot \sqrt{2.30753 - x}\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 72.0%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2.30753 - x} \cdot \sqrt{2.30753 - x}\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 98.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2.30753 - x\right)} \]

   2. flip-- 73.7%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{2.30753 \cdot 2.30753 - x \cdot x}{2.30753 + x}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.70711 \cdot \left(2.30753 \cdot 2.30753 - x \cdot x\right)}{2.30753 + x}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5.3246947009} - x \cdot x\right)}{2.30753 + x} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.70711 \cdot \left(5.3246947009 - x \cdot x\right)}{2.30753 + x}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(5.3246947009 - x \cdot x\right) \cdot 0.70711}}{2.30753 + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5.3246947009 - x \cdot x}{\frac{2.30753 + x}{0.70711}}} \]

   3. +-commutative 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{5.3246947009 - x \cdot x}{\frac{\color{blue}{x + 2.30753}}{0.70711}} \]

8. Simplified 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5.3246947009 - x \cdot x}{\frac{x + 2.30753}{0.70711}}} \]

9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]

10. Final simplification 53.1%

    \[\leadsto 1.6316775383 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023249 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))