Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Backend.Diagrams:calcFontMetrics from Chart-diagrams-1.5.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 88.7% → 99.4%
Time: 5.5s
Alternatives: 12
Speedup: 0.3×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 12 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 88.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-244} \lor \neg \left(t_0 \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z)))))
   (if (or (<= t_0 -1e-244) (not (<= t_0 0.0))) t_0 (- (- z) (/ z (/ y x))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-244) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
    if ((t_0 <= (-1d-244)) .or. (.not. (t_0 <= 0.0d0))) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = -z - (z / (y / x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-244) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -1e-244) or not (t_0 <= 0.0):
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-244) || !(t_0 <= 0.0))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - Float64(z / Float64(y / x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-244) || ~((t_0 <= 0.0)))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, -1e-244], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 0.0]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$0, N[((-z) - N[(z / N[(y / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-244} \lor \neg \left(t_0 \leq 0\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 (+.f64 x y) (-.f64 1 (/.f64 y z))) < -9.9999999999999993e-245 or 0.0 < (/.f64 (+.f64 x y) (-.f64 1 (/.f64 y z)))

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]

    if -9.9999999999999993e-245 < (/.f64 (+.f64 x y) (-.f64 1 (/.f64 y z))) < 0.0

    1. Initial program 19.3%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/91.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + x\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}} \]
      2. +-commutative91.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \cdot z\right)}{y} \]
      3. *-commutative91.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}{y} \]
      4. associate-*r*91.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}{y} \]
      5. mul-1-neg91.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y} \]
      6. +-commutative91.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}}{y} \]
    4. Simplified91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}{y}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg99.6%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{z \cdot x}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    7. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-244} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 66.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.95e+74)
   (- z)
   (if (<= y -1.6e-5)
     (+ x y)
     (if (<= y -3.2e-30)
       (- z)
       (if (<= y 1.02e+61) (/ x (- 1.0 (/ y z))) (- z))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+74) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= -1.6e-5) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= -3.2e-30) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.02e+61) {
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.95d+74)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= (-1.6d-5)) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (y <= (-3.2d-30)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= 1.02d+61) then
        tmp = x / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+74) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= -1.6e-5) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= -3.2e-30) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.02e+61) {
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.95e+74:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= -1.6e-5:
		tmp = x + y
	elif y <= -3.2e-30:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= 1.02e+61:
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z))
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.95e+74)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= -1.6e-5)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (y <= -3.2e-30)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= 1.02e+61)
		tmp = Float64(x / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.95e+74)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= -1.6e-5)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (y <= -3.2e-30)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= 1.02e+61)
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.95e+74], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, -1.6e-5], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -3.2e-30], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, 1.02e+61], N[(x / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -1.95000000000000004e74 or -1.59999999999999993e-5 < y < -3.2e-30 or 1.01999999999999999e61 < y

    1. Initial program 70.0%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg78.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    4. Simplified78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -1.95000000000000004e74 < y < -1.59999999999999993e-5

    1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

    if -3.2e-30 < y < 1.01999999999999999e61

    1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification76.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 67.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 1 - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{t_0}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{t_0}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- 1.0 (/ y z))))
   (if (<= y -8.5e+77)
     (- z)
     (if (<= y -7.5e-46) (/ y t_0) (if (<= y 1.2e+61) (/ x t_0) (- z))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.5e+77) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= -7.5e-46) {
		tmp = y / t_0;
	} else if (y <= 1.2e+61) {
		tmp = x / t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = 1.0d0 - (y / z)
    if (y <= (-8.5d+77)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= (-7.5d-46)) then
        tmp = y / t_0
    else if (y <= 1.2d+61) then
        tmp = x / t_0
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.5e+77) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= -7.5e-46) {
		tmp = y / t_0;
	} else if (y <= 1.2e+61) {
		tmp = x / t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = 1.0 - (y / z)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -8.5e+77:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= -7.5e-46:
		tmp = y / t_0
	elif y <= 1.2e+61:
		tmp = x / t_0
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -8.5e+77)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= -7.5e-46)
		tmp = Float64(y / t_0);
	elseif (y <= 1.2e+61)
		tmp = Float64(x / t_0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = 1.0 - (y / z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -8.5e+77)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= -7.5e-46)
		tmp = y / t_0;
	elseif (y <= 1.2e+61)
		tmp = x / t_0;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -8.5e+77], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, -7.5e-46], N[(y / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.2e+61], N[(x / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 1 - \frac{y}{z}\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{y}{t_0}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x}{t_0}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -8.50000000000000018e77 or 1.1999999999999999e61 < y

    1. Initial program 66.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg79.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    4. Simplified79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -8.50000000000000018e77 < y < -7.50000000000000027e-46

    1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 61.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}} \]

    if -7.50000000000000027e-46 < y < 1.1999999999999999e61

    1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification76.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 65.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.72 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-67}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;-x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.72e+73)
   (- z)
   (if (<= y 3.1e-67) (+ x y) (if (<= y 3.1e+29) (- (* x (/ z y))) (- z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.72e+73) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 3.1e-67) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= 3.1e+29) {
		tmp = -(x * (z / y));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2.72d+73)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= 3.1d-67) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (y <= 3.1d+29) then
        tmp = -(x * (z / y))
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.72e+73) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 3.1e-67) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= 3.1e+29) {
		tmp = -(x * (z / y));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.72e+73:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= 3.1e-67:
		tmp = x + y
	elif y <= 3.1e+29:
		tmp = -(x * (z / y))
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.72e+73)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= 3.1e-67)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (y <= 3.1e+29)
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(x * Float64(z / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.72e+73)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= 3.1e-67)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (y <= 3.1e+29)
		tmp = -(x * (z / y));
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.72e+73], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, 3.1e-67], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 3.1e+29], (-N[(x * N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), (-z)]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.72 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-67}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\
\;\;\;\;-x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -2.7199999999999999e73 or 3.0999999999999999e29 < y

    1. Initial program 67.7%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg75.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    4. Simplified75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -2.7199999999999999e73 < y < 3.1000000000000003e-67

    1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

    if 3.1000000000000003e-67 < y < 3.0999999999999999e29

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/69.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + x\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}} \]
      2. +-commutative69.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \cdot z\right)}{y} \]
      3. *-commutative69.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}{y} \]
      4. associate-*r*69.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}{y} \]
      5. mul-1-neg69.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y} \]
      6. +-commutative69.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}}{y} \]
    4. Simplified69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}{y}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg69.6%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg69.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg69.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{z \cdot x}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*74.6%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    7. Simplified74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg45.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      2. associate-*l/50.1%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot x} \]
      3. distribute-lft-neg-in50.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{y}\right) \cdot x} \]
      4. *-commutative50.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{y}\right)} \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac50.1%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{y}} \]
    10. Simplified50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-z}{y}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification72.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.72 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-67}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;-x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 64.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \frac{-x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.2e+73)
   (- z)
   (if (<= y 1.3e-66) (+ x y) (if (<= y 9.5e+53) (* z (/ (- x) y)) (- z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.2e+73) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.3e-66) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= 9.5e+53) {
		tmp = z * (-x / y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-6.2d+73)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= 1.3d-66) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (y <= 9.5d+53) then
        tmp = z * (-x / y)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.2e+73) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.3e-66) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= 9.5e+53) {
		tmp = z * (-x / y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -6.2e+73:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= 1.3e-66:
		tmp = x + y
	elif y <= 9.5e+53:
		tmp = z * (-x / y)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.2e+73)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= 1.3e-66)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (y <= 9.5e+53)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(Float64(-x) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -6.2e+73)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= 1.3e-66)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (y <= 9.5e+53)
		tmp = z * (-x / y);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.2e+73], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, 1.3e-66], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 9.5e+53], N[(z * N[((-x) / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \frac{-x}{y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -6.1999999999999999e73 or 9.5000000000000006e53 < y

    1. Initial program 67.5%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg79.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    4. Simplified79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -6.1999999999999999e73 < y < 1.2999999999999999e-66

    1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

    if 1.2999999999999999e-66 < y < 9.5000000000000006e53

    1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/72.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + x\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}} \]
      2. +-commutative72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \cdot z\right)}{y} \]
      3. *-commutative72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}{y} \]
      4. associate-*r*72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}{y} \]
      5. mul-1-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y} \]
      6. +-commutative72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}}{y} \]
    4. Simplified72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}{y}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{z \cdot x}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*75.6%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    7. Simplified75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg45.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      2. associate-*r/48.5%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{x}{y}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out48.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
      4. distribute-neg-frac48.5%

        \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-x}{y}} \]
    10. Simplified48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-x}{y}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification73.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \frac{-x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 65.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.1 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z}{-\frac{y}{x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.3e+75)
   (- z)
   (if (<= y 1.3e-66) (+ x y) (if (<= y 7.1e+53) (/ z (- (/ y x))) (- z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.3e+75) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.3e-66) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= 7.1e+53) {
		tmp = z / -(y / x);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.3d+75)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= 1.3d-66) then
        tmp = x + y
    else if (y <= 7.1d+53) then
        tmp = z / -(y / x)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.3e+75) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.3e-66) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else if (y <= 7.1e+53) {
		tmp = z / -(y / x);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.3e+75:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= 1.3e-66:
		tmp = x + y
	elif y <= 7.1e+53:
		tmp = z / -(y / x)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.3e+75)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= 1.3e-66)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	elseif (y <= 7.1e+53)
		tmp = Float64(z / Float64(-Float64(y / x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.3e+75)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= 1.3e-66)
		tmp = x + y;
	elseif (y <= 7.1e+53)
		tmp = z / -(y / x);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.3e+75], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, 1.3e-66], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.1e+53], N[(z / (-N[(y / x), $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.1 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{z}{-\frac{y}{x}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -3.29999999999999998e75 or 7.09999999999999974e53 < y

    1. Initial program 67.5%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg79.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    4. Simplified79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -3.29999999999999998e75 < y < 1.2999999999999999e-66

    1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

    if 1.2999999999999999e-66 < y < 7.09999999999999974e53

    1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/72.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + x\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}} \]
      2. +-commutative72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \cdot z\right)}{y} \]
      3. *-commutative72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}{y} \]
      4. associate-*r*72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}{y} \]
      5. mul-1-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y} \]
      6. +-commutative72.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}}{y} \]
    4. Simplified72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}{y}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg72.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{z \cdot x}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*75.6%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    7. Simplified75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg45.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      2. associate-*l/41.8%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot x} \]
      3. distribute-lft-neg-in41.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{y}\right) \cdot x} \]
      4. *-commutative41.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{y}\right)} \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac41.8%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{y}} \]
    10. Simplified41.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-z}{y}} \]
    11. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative41.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{y} \cdot x} \]
      2. frac-2neg41.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-\left(-z\right)}{-y}} \cdot x \]
      3. remove-double-neg41.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{z}}{-y} \cdot x \]
      4. associate-*l/45.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot x}{-y}} \]
    12. Applied egg-rr45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot x}{-y}} \]
    13. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*48.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{-y}{x}}} \]
    14. Simplified48.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{-y}{x}}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification73.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.1 \cdot 10^{+53}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{z}{-\frac{y}{x}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 72.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-69} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.85e-69) (not (<= y 1.05e-71)))
   (* z (- -1.0 (/ x y)))
   (/ x (- 1.0 (/ y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.85e-69) || !(y <= 1.05e-71)) {
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.85d-69)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.05d-71))) then
        tmp = z * ((-1.0d0) - (x / y))
    else
        tmp = x / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.85e-69) || !(y <= 1.05e-71)) {
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.85e-69) or not (y <= 1.05e-71):
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y))
	else:
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.85e-69) || !(y <= 1.05e-71))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(x / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.85e-69) || ~((y <= 1.05e-71)))
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y));
	else
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.85e-69], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.05e-71]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(-1.0 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-69} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-71}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -1.8500000000000001e-69 or 1.0500000000000001e-71 < y

    1. Initial program 76.7%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/63.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + x\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}} \]
      2. +-commutative63.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \cdot z\right)}{y} \]
      3. *-commutative63.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}{y} \]
      4. associate-*r*63.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}{y} \]
      5. mul-1-neg63.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y} \]
      6. +-commutative63.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}}{y} \]
    4. Simplified63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}{y}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg74.4%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg74.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg74.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{z \cdot x}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*79.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    7. Simplified79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg79.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot z} \]
      2. *-commutative79.0%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
    10. Simplified79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

    if -1.8500000000000001e-69 < y < 1.0500000000000001e-71

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification81.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.85 \cdot 10^{-69} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 72.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.75e-69)
   (- (- z) (/ z (/ y x)))
   (if (<= y 1.02e-72) (/ x (- 1.0 (/ y z))) (* z (- -1.0 (/ x y))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.75e-69) {
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x));
	} else if (y <= 1.02e-72) {
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.75d-69)) then
        tmp = -z - (z / (y / x))
    else if (y <= 1.02d-72) then
        tmp = x / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
    else
        tmp = z * ((-1.0d0) - (x / y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.75e-69) {
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x));
	} else if (y <= 1.02e-72) {
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.75e-69:
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x))
	elif y <= 1.02e-72:
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z))
	else:
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.75e-69)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - Float64(z / Float64(y / x)));
	elseif (y <= 1.02e-72)
		tmp = Float64(x / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(x / y)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.75e-69)
		tmp = -z - (z / (y / x));
	elseif (y <= 1.02e-72)
		tmp = x / (1.0 - (y / z));
	else
		tmp = z * (-1.0 - (x / y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.75e-69], N[((-z) - N[(z / N[(y / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.02e-72], N[(x / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(-1.0 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -1.7500000000000001e-69

    1. Initial program 80.7%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/57.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + x\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}} \]
      2. +-commutative57.7%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \cdot z\right)}{y} \]
      3. *-commutative57.7%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}{y} \]
      4. associate-*r*57.7%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}{y} \]
      5. mul-1-neg57.7%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y} \]
      6. +-commutative57.7%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}}{y} \]
    4. Simplified57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}{y}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 68.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg68.4%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg68.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg68.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{z \cdot x}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*73.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    7. Simplified73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]

    if -1.7500000000000001e-69 < y < 1.02e-72

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}} \]

    if 1.02e-72 < y

    1. Initial program 72.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\left(y + x\right) \cdot z}{y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/69.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + x\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}} \]
      2. +-commutative69.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} \cdot z\right)}{y} \]
      3. *-commutative69.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}}{y} \]
      4. associate-*r*69.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)}}{y} \]
      5. mul-1-neg69.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right)}{y} \]
      6. +-commutative69.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}}{y} \]
    4. Simplified69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(y + x\right)}{y}} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg80.3%

        \[\leadsto -1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]
      2. unsub-neg80.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z - \frac{z \cdot x}{y}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg80.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - \frac{z \cdot x}{y} \]
      4. associate-/l*84.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    7. Simplified84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg84.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot z} \]
      2. *-commutative84.0%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
    10. Simplified84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification81.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - \frac{z}{\frac{y}{x}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 65.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-71}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.15e+74) (- z) (if (<= y 2.7e-71) (+ x y) (- z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+74) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 2.7e-71) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.15d+74)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= 2.7d-71) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+74) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 2.7e-71) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.15e+74:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= 2.7e-71:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.15e+74)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= 2.7e-71)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.15e+74)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= 2.7e-71)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.15e+74], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, 2.7e-71], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-71}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -1.1499999999999999e74 or 2.7000000000000001e-71 < y

    1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg68.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    4. Simplified68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -1.1499999999999999e74 < y < 2.7000000000000001e-71

    1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification71.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-71}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 56.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.75e-46) (- z) (if (<= y 1.06e-73) x (- z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.75e-46) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.06e-73) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.75d-46)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (y <= 1.06d-73) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.75e-46) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (y <= 1.06e-73) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.75e-46:
		tmp = -z
	elif y <= 1.06e-73:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.75e-46)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (y <= 1.06e-73)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.75e-46)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (y <= 1.06e-73)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.75e-46], (-z), If[LessEqual[y, 1.06e-73], x, (-z)]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -1.7500000000000001e-46 or 1.05999999999999997e-73 < y

    1. Initial program 76.1%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg63.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
    4. Simplified63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

    if -1.7500000000000001e-46 < y < 1.05999999999999997e-73

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification65.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 40.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-193}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-95}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8.2e-193) x (if (<= x 2e-95) y x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e-193) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 2e-95) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-8.2d-193)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 2d-95) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e-193) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 2e-95) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.2e-193:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 2e-95:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.2e-193)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 2e-95)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.2e-193)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 2e-95)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8.2e-193], x, If[LessEqual[x, 2e-95], y, x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-193}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-95}:\\
\;\;\;\;y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -8.20000000000000005e-193 or 1.99999999999999998e-95 < x

    1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if -8.20000000000000005e-193 < x < 1.99999999999999998e-95

    1. Initial program 80.9%

      \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 31.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification41.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-193}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-95}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 34.4% accurate, 9.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x
function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := x
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 85.7%

    \[\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}} \]
  2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 35.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Final simplification35.3%

    \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 93.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y + x}{-y} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;y < -3.7429310762689856 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y < 3.5534662456086734 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ (+ y x) (- y)) z)))
   (if (< y -3.7429310762689856e+171)
     t_0
     (if (< y 3.5534662456086734e+168) (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))) t_0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168) {
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z
    if (y < (-3.7429310762689856d+171)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y < 3.5534662456086734d+168) then
        tmp = (x + y) / (1.0d0 - (y / z))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168) {
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z
	tmp = 0
	if y < -3.7429310762689856e+171:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y < 3.5534662456086734e+168:
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(y + x) / Float64(-y)) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) / Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / z)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = ((y + x) / -y) * z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < -3.7429310762689856e+171)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y < 3.5534662456086734e+168)
		tmp = (x + y) / (1.0 - (y / z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision] / (-y)), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[y, -3.7429310762689856e+171], t$95$0, If[Less[y, 3.5534662456086734e+168], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{y + x}{-y} \cdot z\\
\mathbf{if}\;y < -3.7429310762689856 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y < 3.5534662456086734 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x + y}{1 - \frac{y}{z}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023242 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Backend.Diagrams:calcFontMetrics from Chart-diagrams-1.5.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< y -3.7429310762689856e+171) (* (/ (+ y x) (- y)) z) (if (< y 3.5534662456086734e+168) (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))) (* (/ (+ y x) (- y)) z)))

  (/ (+ x y) (- 1.0 (/ y z))))