Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 98.3% → 99.3%

Time: 4.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.7×

• 34.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x y (* z (* z 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, y, (z * (z * 3.0)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(z * 3.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-*l* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 85.1% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 2.2e+62) (* x y) (* 3.0 (* z z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.2e+62) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 2.2d+62) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (z * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.2e+62) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 2.2e+62:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 2.2e+62)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(z * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 2.2e+62)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 2.2e+62], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(3.0 * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 2.20000000000000015e62

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if 2.20000000000000015e62 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 89.3%

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 85.2% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 4e+59) (* x y) (* z (* z 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+59) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 4d+59) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * (z * 3.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+59) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 4e+59:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 4e+59)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * 3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+59)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 4e+59], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 3.99999999999999989e59

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if 3.99999999999999989e59 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      2. unpow2 89.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot z + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 89.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]

      6. associate-*r* 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.3% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* z (* z 3.0)) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * (z * 3.0d0)) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * 3.0)) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-*l* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-udef 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

6. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y \]

Alternative 5: 52.7% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-*l* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-udef 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 55.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

7. Final simplification 55.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y \]

Developer target: 98.3% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((3.0d0 * z) * z) + (y * x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * z) * z) + Float64(y * x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(3.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023242 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x))

  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))