Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.0%
Time: 22.0s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 76.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (/
     -1.0
     (*
      u
      (+
       (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))
       (/ -1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f / (u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (-1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) / (u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))) + (single(-1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in u around -inf 97.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot u} + \left(1 + \frac{1}{\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub097.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot u} + \left(1 + \frac{1}{\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. associate-+r+97.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot u} + 1\right) + \frac{1}{\left(1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right)\right)}\right)}\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified97.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 + \frac{-1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right) - \frac{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{2}}\right)}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 76.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - \frac{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-/r*76.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}{u}} - \frac{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right) \]
    2. +-commutative76.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\frac{-1}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}{u} - \frac{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right) \]
    3. distribute-frac-neg76.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\frac{-1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}}}{u} - \frac{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified76.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}}{u}} - \frac{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{\left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot {\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right) \]
  10. Taylor expanded in u around -inf -0.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) + \log \left(\frac{-1}{u}\right)\right)\right)} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg-0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) + \log \left(\frac{-1}{u}\right)\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in-0.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) + \log \left(\frac{-1}{u}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative-0.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{-1}{u}\right) + \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    4. log-rec-0.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\log \left(\frac{-1}{u}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    5. unsub-neg-0.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{-1}{u}\right) - \log \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    6. sub-neg-0.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\log \left(\frac{-1}{u}\right) - \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{\pi}{s}} + 1} + \left(-\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
  12. Simplified76.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
  13. Final simplification76.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 25.1% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (+ 1.0 (* -4.0 (/ (- (* 0.25 (* u PI)) (* PI 0.25)) s)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((1.0f + (-4.0f * (((0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - (((float) M_PI) * 0.25f)) / s))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25))) / s))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(1.0) + (single(-4.0) * (((single(0.25) * (u * single(pi))) - (single(pi) * single(0.25))) / s))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s} + 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot 0.25}}{s} + 1\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot 0.25}}{s} + 1\right)\right) \]
  8. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi \cdot 0.25}{s}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 25.1% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (+ 1.0 (* -4.0 (* (/ PI s) -0.25)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((1.0f + (-4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) / s) * -0.25f))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / s) * Float32(-0.25)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(1.0) + (single(-4.0) * ((single(pi) / s) * single(-0.25)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25\right)} + 1\right)\right) \]
  8. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 11.6% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ -0.25 (* u 0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (-0.25f + (u * 0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(-0.25) + (u * single(0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    3. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  9. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 11.4% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg11.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification11.2%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))