Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, lower

Percentage Accurate: 61.6% → 99.4%
Time: 9.1s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 21.8×

Specification

?
\[\left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 256\right) \land \left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 0.25\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - (4.0f * u))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - (4.0e0 * u))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(4.0) * u)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - (single(4.0) * u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 61.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - (4.0f * u))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - (4.0e0 * u))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(4.0) * u)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - (single(4.0) * u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* (log1p (* u -4.0)) (- s)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return log1pf((u * -4.0f)) * -s;
}
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(log1p(Float32(u * Float32(-4.0))) * Float32(-s))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.7%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \cdot s} \]
    2. log-rec62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot s \]
    3. distribute-lft-neg-out62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s} \]
    4. distribute-rgt-neg-in62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    5. sub-neg62.9%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. log1p-def99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. *-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(-\color{blue}{u \cdot 4}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(-4\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.4%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]

Alternative 2: 86.7% accurate, 8.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4\right) + u \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(s \cdot 8\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (+ (* u (* s 4.0)) (* u (* u (* s 8.0)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return (u * (s * 4.0f)) + (u * (u * (s * 8.0f)));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = (u * (s * 4.0e0)) + (u * (u * (s * 8.0e0)))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(u * Float32(s * Float32(4.0))) + Float32(u * Float32(u * Float32(s * Float32(8.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = (u * (s * single(4.0))) + (u * (u * (s * single(8.0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4\right) + u \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(s \cdot 8\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.7%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. flip3--58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}{1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)}}}\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}} \cdot \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
    3. log-prod58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
    4. metadata-eval58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. *-commutative58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right)}}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. unpow-prod-down58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \color{blue}{{u}^{3} \cdot {4}^{3}}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{64}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \log \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    9. log1p-udef96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)}\right) \]
    10. *-un-lft-identity96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + \color{blue}{4 \cdot u}\right)\right) \]
    11. distribute-lft1-in96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
    12. fma-def96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)} \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied egg-rr96.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right)\right)} \]
    2. log-rec96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    4. log1p-def99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)}\right)\right) \]
    5. unsub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)} \]
    6. *-commutative99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    8. associate-*l*99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{u}^{3} \cdot \left(-64\right)}\right)\right) \]
    10. metadata-eval99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{-64}\right)\right) \]
  5. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot -64\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 86.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    2. unpow286.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    3. fma-def87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(4 \cdot s, u, 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right)\right)\right)} \]
    4. unpow287.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(4 \cdot s, u, 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{{u}^{2}}\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(4 \cdot s, u, \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot {u}^{2}}\right) \]
    6. unpow287.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(4 \cdot s, u, \left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    7. associate-*r*87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(4 \cdot s, u, \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot u}\right) \]
  8. Simplified87.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(4 \cdot s, u, \left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-udef86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot s\right) \cdot u + \left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot u} \]
    2. *-commutative86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot 4\right)} \cdot u + \left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot u \]
    3. *-commutative86.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(s \cdot 4\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\left(8 \cdot s\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
    4. *-commutative86.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(s \cdot 4\right) \cdot u + u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(8 \cdot s\right)\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative86.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(s \cdot 4\right) \cdot u + u \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot 8\right)}\right) \]
  10. Applied egg-rr86.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot 4\right) \cdot u + u \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(s \cdot 8\right)\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification86.9%

    \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot 4\right) + u \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(s \cdot 8\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 86.7% accurate, 9.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right) + u \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (+ (* 8.0 (* u u)) (* u 4.0))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * ((8.0f * (u * u)) + (u * 4.0f));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * ((8.0e0 * (u * u)) + (u * 4.0e0))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(Float32(8.0) * Float32(u * u)) + Float32(u * Float32(4.0))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * ((single(8.0) * (u * u)) + (u * single(4.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right) + u \cdot 4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.7%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 86.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def86.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(8, {u}^{2}, 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
    2. unpow286.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(8, \color{blue}{u \cdot u}, 4 \cdot u\right) \]
  4. Simplified86.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(8, u \cdot u, 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-udef86.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right) + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative86.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot 4}\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr86.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right) + u \cdot 4\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification86.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right) + u \cdot 4\right) \]

Alternative 4: 86.6% accurate, 12.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (* u (+ 4.0 (* u 8.0)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (u * (4.0f + (u * 8.0f)));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * (u * (4.0e0 + (u * 8.0e0)))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(4.0) + Float32(u * Float32(8.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * (u * (single(4.0) + (u * single(8.0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.7%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. flip3--58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}{1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)}}}\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}} \cdot \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
    3. log-prod58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
    4. metadata-eval58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. *-commutative58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right)}}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. unpow-prod-down58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \color{blue}{{u}^{3} \cdot {4}^{3}}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{64}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \log \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    9. log1p-udef96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)}\right) \]
    10. *-un-lft-identity96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + \color{blue}{4 \cdot u}\right)\right) \]
    11. distribute-lft1-in96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
    12. fma-def96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)} \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied egg-rr96.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right)\right)} \]
    2. log-rec96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    4. log1p-def99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)}\right)\right) \]
    5. unsub-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)} \]
    6. *-commutative99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    8. associate-*l*99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{u}^{3} \cdot \left(-64\right)}\right)\right) \]
    10. metadata-eval99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{-64}\right)\right) \]
  5. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot -64\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{16 \cdot {u}^{2} + 4 \cdot u}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot -64\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def99.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(16, {u}^{2}, 4 \cdot u\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot -64\right)\right) \]
    2. unpow299.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(16, \color{blue}{u \cdot u}, 4 \cdot u\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot -64\right)\right) \]
  8. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(16, u \cdot u, 4 \cdot u\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot -64\right)\right) \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around 0 86.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative86.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot s\right)} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative86.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s + 8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({u}^{2} \cdot s\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r*86.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \cdot s} \]
    5. distribute-rgt-in86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(4 \cdot u + 8 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
    6. +-commutative86.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
    7. +-commutative86.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + 8 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
    8. unpow286.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(4 \cdot u + 8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    9. associate-*r*86.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(4 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u}\right) \]
    10. distribute-rgt-out86.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    11. *-commutative86.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot 8}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified86.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification86.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 73.4% accurate, 21.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* u s)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return 4.0f * (u * s);
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = 4.0e0 * (u * s)
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(u * s))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (u * s);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.7%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 74.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative74.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  4. Simplified74.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification74.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right) \]

Alternative 6: 73.6% accurate, 21.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (* u 4.0)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (u * 4.0f);
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * (u * 4.0e0)
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(4.0)))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * (u * single(4.0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.7%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 74.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification74.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4\right) \]

Alternative 7: 16.5% accurate, 36.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s 0.0))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * 0.0e0
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(0.0))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot 0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.7%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Applied egg-rr16.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot u\right) - 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-inverses16.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{0} \]
  4. Simplified16.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{0} \]
  5. Final simplification16.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot 0 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (s u)
  :name "Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, lower"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 256.0)) (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 0.25)))
  (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))