math.sqrt on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 41.4% → 84.9%

Time: 4.5s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 2.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 41.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 84.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot \frac{im}{re}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))))) 0.0)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (* -0.5 (* im (/ im re))))))
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (hypot re im)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (sqrt((2.0 * (re + sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + Math.hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + math.hypot(re, im))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))))) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * Float64(im / re))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + hypot(re, im)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (sqrt((2.0 * (re + sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))))) <= 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(-0.5 * N[(im * N[(im / re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 2 (+.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re))) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 8.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 8.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 8.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 8.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 51.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 51.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 54.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 54.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 54.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{im}{re} \cdot im\right)}\right)} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 54.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{im}{re} \cdot im\right)}\right)} \]

   if 0.0 < (sqrt.f64 (*.f64 2 (+.f64 (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 re re) (*.f64 im im))) re)))

   1. Initial program 42.8%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 42.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 87.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot \frac{im}{re}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 50.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot \frac{im}{re}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-34} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.00105\right) \land re \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -3.7e+65)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (* -0.5 (* im (/ im re))))))
   (if (or (<= re 3.7e-34) (and (not (<= re 0.00105)) (<= re 3.6e+57)))
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re im))))
     (* 0.5 (* 2.0 (sqrt re))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -3.7e+65) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))));
	} else if ((re <= 3.7e-34) || (!(re <= 0.00105) && (re <= 3.6e+57))) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-3.7d+65)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * ((-0.5d0) * (im * (im / re)))))
    else if ((re <= 3.7d-34) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.00105d0)) .and. (re <= 3.6d+57)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (re + im)))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (2.0d0 * sqrt(re))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -3.7e+65) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))));
	} else if ((re <= 3.7e-34) || (!(re <= 0.00105) && (re <= 3.6e+57))) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * Math.sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -3.7e+65:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))))
	elif (re <= 3.7e-34) or (not (re <= 0.00105) and (re <= 3.6e+57)):
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * math.sqrt(re))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -3.7e+65)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * Float64(im / re))))));
	elseif ((re <= 3.7e-34) || (!(re <= 0.00105) && (re <= 3.6e+57)))
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + im))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(2.0 * sqrt(re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -3.7e+65)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im * (im / re)))));
	elseif ((re <= 3.7e-34) || (~((re <= 0.00105)) && (re <= 3.6e+57)))
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -3.7e+65], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(-0.5 * N[(im * N[(im / re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[re, 3.7e-34], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.00105]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 3.6e+57]]], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -3.69999999999999995e65

   1. Initial program 6.6%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 33.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 33.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 46.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 46.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 48.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 48.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 48.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{im}{re} \cdot im\right)}\right)} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 48.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{im}{re} \cdot im\right)}\right)} \]

   if -3.69999999999999995e65 < re < 3.69999999999999988e-34 or 0.00104999999999999994 < re < 3.6000000000000002e57

   1. Initial program 50.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 87.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 36.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right)}} \]

   if 3.69999999999999988e-34 < re < 0.00104999999999999994 or 3.6000000000000002e57 < re

   1. Initial program 39.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 39.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 79.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

      2. rem-square-sqrt 81.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 81.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot \frac{im}{re}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-34} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.00105\right) \land re \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 50.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-33} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.00082\right) \land re \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -1.5e+65)
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (* -0.5 (/ im (/ re im))))))
   (if (or (<= re 2.5e-33) (and (not (<= re 0.00082)) (<= re 1.35e+57)))
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re im))))
     (* 0.5 (* 2.0 (sqrt re))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -1.5e+65) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im / (re / im)))));
	} else if ((re <= 2.5e-33) || (!(re <= 0.00082) && (re <= 1.35e+57))) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-1.5d+65)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * ((-0.5d0) * (im / (re / im)))))
    else if ((re <= 2.5d-33) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.00082d0)) .and. (re <= 1.35d+57)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (re + im)))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (2.0d0 * sqrt(re))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -1.5e+65) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im / (re / im)))));
	} else if ((re <= 2.5e-33) || (!(re <= 0.00082) && (re <= 1.35e+57))) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * Math.sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -1.5e+65:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im / (re / im)))))
	elif (re <= 2.5e-33) or (not (re <= 0.00082) and (re <= 1.35e+57)):
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * math.sqrt(re))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -1.5e+65)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im / Float64(re / im))))));
	elseif ((re <= 2.5e-33) || (!(re <= 0.00082) && (re <= 1.35e+57)))
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + im))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(2.0 * sqrt(re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -1.5e+65)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (-0.5 * (im / (re / im)))));
	elseif ((re <= 2.5e-33) || (~((re <= 0.00082)) && (re <= 1.35e+57)))
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -1.5e+65], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(-0.5 * N[(im / N[(re / im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[re, 2.5e-33], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.00082]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1.35e+57]]], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -1.5000000000000001e65

   1. Initial program 6.6%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 33.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 33.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 46.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}\right)}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 46.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 48.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 48.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}\right)}} \]

   if -1.5000000000000001e65 < re < 2.50000000000000014e-33 or 8.1999999999999998e-4 < re < 1.3499999999999999e57

   1. Initial program 50.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 87.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 36.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right)}} \]

   if 2.50000000000000014e-33 < re < 8.1999999999999998e-4 or 1.3499999999999999e57 < re

   1. Initial program 39.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 39.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 79.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

      2. rem-square-sqrt 81.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 81.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\frac{re}{im}}\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-33} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.00082\right) \land re \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 43.1% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 3.7e-58)
   (* 0.5 (* 2.0 (sqrt re)))
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re im))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 3.7e-58) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 3.7d-58) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (2.0d0 * sqrt(re))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (re + im)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 3.7e-58) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * Math.sqrt(re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 3.7e-58:
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * math.sqrt(re))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 3.7e-58)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(2.0 * sqrt(re)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + im))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 3.7e-58)
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 3.7e-58], N[(0.5 * N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if im < 3.7000000000000003e-58

   1. Initial program 38.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 38.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 29.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 29.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

      2. rem-square-sqrt 30.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 30.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]

   if 3.7000000000000003e-58 < im

   1. Initial program 42.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 42.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 76.0%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 42.9% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= im 1.55e-58) (* 0.5 (* 2.0 (sqrt re))) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 im)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.55e-58) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (im <= 1.55d-58) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (2.0d0 * sqrt(re))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * im))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.55e-58) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * Math.sqrt(re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 1.55e-58:
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * math.sqrt(re))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * im))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 1.55e-58)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(2.0 * sqrt(re)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * im)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 1.55e-58)
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * im));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[im, 1.55e-58], N[(0.5 * N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * im), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if im < 1.55e-58

   1. Initial program 38.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 38.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 29.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 29.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

      2. rem-square-sqrt 30.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 30.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]

   if 1.55e-58 < im

   1. Initial program 42.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 42.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 88.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{im}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 26.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 im))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * im));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * im))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * im));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * im))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * im)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * im));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * im), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 39.5%

   \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 39.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

   2. hypot-def 79.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{im}} \]

5. Final simplification 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot im} \]

Developer target: 48.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\\ \mathbf{if}\;re < 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{t_0 - re}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(t_0 + re\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))))
   (if (< re 0.0)
     (* 0.5 (* (sqrt 2.0) (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- t_0 re)))))
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ t_0 re)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	double tmp;
	if (re < 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))
    if (re < 0.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (sqrt(2.0d0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (t_0 + re)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	double tmp;
	if (re < 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (Math.sqrt(2.0) * Math.sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	t_0 = math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))
	tmp = 0
	if re < 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * (math.sqrt(2.0) * math.sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re < 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / Float64(t_0 - re)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_0 + re))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re < 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[re, 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$0 + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.sqrt on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< re 0.0) (* 0.5 (* (sqrt 2.0) (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re))))) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

  (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))