Linear.V3:cross from linear-1.19.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.1% → 99.5%

Time: 1.9s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, t \cdot \left(-z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma x y (* t (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(x, y, (t * -z));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(x, y, Float64(t * Float64(-z)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * y + N[(t * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -z \cdot t\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-t\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(-t\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, t \cdot \left(-z\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 68.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+79} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.6e+79) (not (<= z 3.5e-95))) (* t (- z)) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.6e+79) || !(z <= 3.5e-95)) {
		tmp = t * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4.6d+79)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.5d-95))) then
        tmp = t * -z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.6e+79) || !(z <= 3.5e-95)) {
		tmp = t * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4.6e+79) or not (z <= 3.5e-95):
		tmp = t * -z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.6e+79) || !(z <= 3.5e-95))
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4.6e+79) || ~((z <= 3.5e-95)))
		tmp = t * -z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.6e+79], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.5e-95]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.6000000000000001e79 or 3.4999999999999997e-95 < z

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 71.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 71.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if -4.6000000000000001e79 < z < 3.4999999999999997e-95

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+79} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]

2. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]

Alternative 4: 52.2% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

3. Final simplification 48.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Linear.V3:cross from linear-1.19.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* x y) (* z t)))