Diagrams.Color.HSV:lerp from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 100.0%

Time: 6.8s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.3×

• 20.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((1.0d0 - x) * y) + (x * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * y) + Float64(x * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((1.0d0 - x) * y) + (x * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * y) + Float64(x * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (- z y) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (z - y), y);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(z - y), y)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-rgt1-in 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   4. associate-+l+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

   6. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   7. neg-mul-1 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   8. associate-*r* 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   9. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right) \]

Alternative 2: 61.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+133} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+162}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (- x))))
   (if (<= x -2.4e+180)
     t_0
     (if (<= x -4.6e+18)
       (* x z)
       (if (<= x 1.0)
         y
         (if (or (<= x 2.8e+133) (not (<= x 1.5e+162))) t_0 (* x z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * -x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.4e+180) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= -4.6e+18) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if ((x <= 2.8e+133) || !(x <= 1.5e+162)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * -x
    if (x <= (-2.4d+180)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= (-4.6d+18)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (x <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = y
    else if ((x <= 2.8d+133) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.5d+162))) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * -x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.4e+180) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= -4.6e+18) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if ((x <= 2.8e+133) || !(x <= 1.5e+162)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * -x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.4e+180:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= -4.6e+18:
		tmp = x * z
	elif x <= 1.0:
		tmp = y
	elif (x <= 2.8e+133) or not (x <= 1.5e+162):
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(-x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.4e+180)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= -4.6e+18)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = y;
	elseif ((x <= 2.8e+133) || !(x <= 1.5e+162))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * -x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.4e+180)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= -4.6e+18)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = y;
	elseif ((x <= 2.8e+133) || ~((x <= 1.5e+162)))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -2.4e+180], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, -4.6e+18], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.0], y, If[Or[LessEqual[x, 2.8e+133], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.5e+162]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$0, N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.3999999999999998e180 or 1 < x < 2.80000000000000016e133 or 1.4999999999999999e162 < x

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 65.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot x} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 65.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -2.3999999999999998e180 < x < -4.6e18 or 2.80000000000000016e133 < x < 1.4999999999999999e162

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -4.6e18 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+133} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+162}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 84.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-22} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.2e-22) (not (<= x 2.8e-55))) (* x (- z y)) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.2e-22) || !(x <= 2.8e-55)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.2d-22)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.8d-55))) then
        tmp = x * (z - y)
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.2e-22) || !(x <= 2.8e-55)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.2e-22) or not (x <= 2.8e-55):
		tmp = x * (z - y)
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.2e-22) || !(x <= 2.8e-55))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z - y));
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.2e-22) || ~((x <= 2.8e-55)))
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.2e-22], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.8e-55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.20000000000000016e-22 or 2.79999999999999984e-55 < x

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -4.20000000000000016e-22 < x < 2.79999999999999984e-55

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-22} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.0))) (* x (- z y)) (+ y (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z - y)
    else
        tmp = y + (x * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = x * (z - y)
	else:
		tmp = y + (x * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + Float64(x * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	else
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x + y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 63.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot z - y \cdot y}{z + y}} \cdot x + y \]

      2. associate-*l/ 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot z - y \cdot y\right) \cdot x}{z + y}} + y \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot z - y \cdot y\right) \cdot x}{z + y}} + y \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 60.8% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -4.6e+18) (* x z) (if (<= x 2.45e-61) y (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.6e+18) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= 2.45e-61) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4.6d+18)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (x <= 2.45d-61) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.6e+18) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= 2.45e-61) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.6e+18:
		tmp = x * z
	elif x <= 2.45e-61:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.6e+18)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (x <= 2.45e-61)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.6e+18)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (x <= 2.45e-61)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.6e+18], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2.45e-61], y, N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.6e18 or 2.45000000000000001e-61 < x

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -4.6e18 < x < 2.45000000000000001e-61

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y + x \cdot \left(z - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ y (* x (- z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + (x * (z - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y + (x * (z - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + (x * (z - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y + (x * (z - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y + Float64(x * Float64(z - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y + (x * (z - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y + N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-rgt1-in 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   4. associate-+l+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

   6. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   7. neg-mul-1 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   8. associate-*r* 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   9. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x + y} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto y + x \cdot \left(z - y\right) \]

Alternative 7: 37.4% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

3. Final simplification 35.3%

   \[\leadsto y \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y - x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- y (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y - (x * (y - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y - (x * (y - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y - Float64(x * Float64(y - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y - (x * (y - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y - N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Color.HSV:lerp  from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- y (* x (- y z)))

  (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))