Numeric.SpecFunctions.Extra:bd0 from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 77.4% → 99.7%

Time: 7.5s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 0.5×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * log((x / y))) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * log((x / y))) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.log((x / y))) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 77.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * log((x / y))) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * log((x / y))) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.log((x / y))) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right) \cdot 3\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* x (* (log (/ (cbrt x) (cbrt y))) 3.0)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (log((cbrt(x) / cbrt(y))) * 3.0)) - z;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (Math.log((Math.cbrt(x) / Math.cbrt(y))) * 3.0)) - z;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(Float64(cbrt(x) / cbrt(y))) * 3.0)) - z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[N[(N[Power[x, 1/3], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[y, 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 82.3%

   \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cube-cbrt 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)} - z \]

   2. associate-*l* 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

   3. log-prod 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

   4. pow2 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + \log \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)}^{2}\right)}\right) - z \]

   5. metadata-eval 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + \log \left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 1\right)}}\right)\right) - z \]

   6. log-pow 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(1 + 1\right) \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)}\right) - z \]

   7. metadata-eval 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + \color{blue}{2} \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

3. Applied egg-rr 82.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + 2 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

   2. metadata-eval 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{3} \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

   3. *-commutative 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot 3\right)} - z \]

5. Simplified 82.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot 3\right)} - z \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cbrt-div 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)} \cdot 3\right) - z \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)} \cdot 3\right) - z \]

8. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right) \cdot 3\right) - z \]

Alternative 2: 87.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_0 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (log (/ x y)))))
   (if (<= t_0 (- INFINITY)) (- z) (if (<= t_0 5e+301) (- t_0 z) (- z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (t_0 <= 5e+301) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * Math.log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (t_0 <= 5e+301) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * math.log((x / y))
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = -z
	elif t_0 <= 5e+301:
		tmp = t_0 - z
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (t_0 <= 5e+301)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -Inf)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (t_0 <= 5e+301)
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, (-Infinity)], (-z), If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 5e+301], N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < -inf.0 or 5.0000000000000004e301 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y)))

   1. Initial program 4.4%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 49.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   4. Simplified 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < 5.0000000000000004e301

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+301}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4e-310)
   (- (* x (- (log (- x)) (log (- y)))) z)
   (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-310) {
		tmp = (x * (log(-x) - log(-y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-4d-310)) then
        tmp = (x * (log(-x) - log(-y))) - z
    else
        tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-310) {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(-x) - Math.log(-y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -4e-310:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(-x) - math.log(-y))) - z
	else:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4e-310)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(Float64(-x)) - log(Float64(-y)))) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -4e-310)
		tmp = (x * (log(-x) - log(-y))) - z;
	else
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4e-310], N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[(-x)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.999999999999988e-310

   1. Initial program 87.1%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{-y}\right)} - z \]

      2. log-div 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} - z \]

   if -3.999999999999988e-310 < y

   1. Initial program 78.5%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-div 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} - z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 87.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.6e-292)
   (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z)
   (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.6e-292) {
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.6d-292) then
        tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z
    else
        tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.6e-292) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.6e-292:
		tmp = (x * math.log((x / y))) - z
	else:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.6e-292)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.6e-292)
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	else
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.6e-292], N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.60000000000000013e-292

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   if 2.60000000000000013e-292 < y

   1. Initial program 78.4%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-div 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} - z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 65.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-71} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.1e-71) (not (<= x 8.5e-30))) (* (- x) (log (/ y x))) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.1e-71) || !(x <= 8.5e-30)) {
		tmp = -x * log((y / x));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.1d-71)) .or. (.not. (x <= 8.5d-30))) then
        tmp = -x * log((y / x))
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.1e-71) || !(x <= 8.5e-30)) {
		tmp = -x * Math.log((y / x));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.1e-71) or not (x <= 8.5e-30):
		tmp = -x * math.log((y / x))
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.1e-71) || !(x <= 8.5e-30))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-x) * log(Float64(y / x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.1e-71) || ~((x <= 8.5e-30)))
		tmp = -x * log((y / x));
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.1e-71], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 8.5e-30]], $MachinePrecision]], N[((-x) * N[Log[N[(y / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.1000000000000001e-71 or 8.49999999999999931e-30 < x

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 84.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\frac{y}{x}}\right)} - z \]

      2. neg-log 85.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\right)} - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 85.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\right)} - z \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 68.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -2.1000000000000001e-71 < x < 8.49999999999999931e-30

   1. Initial program 79.0%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 77.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   4. Simplified 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-71} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 65.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-68} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.4e-68) (not (<= x 4.6e-30))) (* x (log (/ x y))) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.4e-68) || !(x <= 4.6e-30)) {
		tmp = x * log((x / y));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.4d-68)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.6d-30))) then
        tmp = x * log((x / y))
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.4e-68) || !(x <= 4.6e-30)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log((x / y));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.4e-68) or not (x <= 4.6e-30):
		tmp = x * math.log((x / y))
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.4e-68) || !(x <= 4.6e-30))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.4e-68) || ~((x <= 4.6e-30)))
		tmp = x * log((x / y));
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.4e-68], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.6e-30]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.4000000000000003e-68 or 4.59999999999999968e-30 < x

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -5.4000000000000003e-68 < x < 4.59999999999999968e-30

   1. Initial program 79.0%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 77.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   4. Simplified 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-68} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 50.2% accurate, 53.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 82.3%

   \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 43.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 43.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

4. Simplified 43.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

5. Final simplification 43.5%

   \[\leadsto -z \]

Developer target: 88.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y < 7.595077799083773 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< y 7.595077799083773e-308)
   (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z)
   (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308) {
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y < 7.595077799083773d-308) then
        tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z
    else
        tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y < 7.595077799083773e-308:
		tmp = (x * math.log((x / y))) - z
	else:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308)
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	else
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[y, 7.595077799083773e-308], N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions.Extra:bd0 from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< y 7.595077799083773e-308) (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z) (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z))

  (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z))