Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.8% → 99.5%

Time: 8.8s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 23.3×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 10\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1e+93) (not (<= y 10.0)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (pow (exp y) (log (/ y (+ y z)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+93) || !(y <= 10.0)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow(exp(y), log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1d+93)) .or. (.not. (y <= 10.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + ((exp(y) ** log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+93) || !(y <= 10.0)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(Math.exp(y), Math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1e+93) or not (y <= 10.0):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(math.exp(y), math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1e+93) || !(y <= 10.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((exp(y) ^ log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z)))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1e+93) || ~((y <= 10.0)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + ((exp(y) ^ log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1e+93], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 10.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[Exp[y], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.00000000000000004e93 or 10 < y

   1. Initial program 83.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-prod 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. rem-exp-log 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}^{y}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -1.00000000000000004e93 < y < 10

   1. Initial program 82.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 10\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -480000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -480000.0) (not (<= y 4e-26)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -480000.0) || !(y <= 4e-26)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-480000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4d-26))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -480000.0) || !(y <= 4e-26)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -480000.0) or not (y <= 4e-26):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -480000.0) || !(y <= 4e-26))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -480000.0) || ~((y <= 4e-26)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -480000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4e-26]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.8e5 or 4.0000000000000002e-26 < y

   1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 85.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-prod 85.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. rem-exp-log 85.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}^{y}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 85.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -4.8e5 < y < 4.0000000000000002e-26

   1. Initial program 79.9%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -480000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 88.9% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -24000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -24000000.0) (/ (exp (- z)) y) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -24000000.0) {
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-24000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = exp(-z) / y
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -24000000.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -24000000.0:
		tmp = math.exp(-z) / y
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -24000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -24000000.0)
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -24000000.0], N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.4e7

   1. Initial program 49.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 65.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 65.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 65.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 65.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right) \cdot y}}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-to-pow 42.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 42.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{z + y}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 60.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   9. Simplified 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -2.4e7 < z

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -24000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 85.5% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{z \cdot z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.6e+167) (* 0.5 (/ (* z z) y)) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.6e+167) {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((z * z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.6d+167)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * ((z * z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.6e+167) {
		tmp = 0.5 * ((z * z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.6e+167:
		tmp = 0.5 * ((z * z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.6e+167)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(z * z) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.6e+167)
		tmp = 0.5 * ((z * z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.6e+167], N[(0.5 * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.5999999999999999e167

   1. Initial program 56.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 56.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right) \cdot y}}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-to-pow 56.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 56.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{z + y}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 56.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{y}\right)} + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \]

      2. associate-+r+ 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{y} + \left(-\frac{z}{y}\right)\right) + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      3. sub-neg 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{y} - \frac{z}{y}\right)} + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      4. div-sub 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 - z}{y}} + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      5. *-commutative 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - z}{y} + \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right)} \]

      6. unpow2 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - z}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \]

      7. associate-*r/ 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - z}{y} + \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot 1}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - z}{y} + \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{0.5}}{y} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}}\right) \]

      9. associate-*r/ 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - z}{y} + \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{0.5}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot 1}{{y}^{2}}}\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 63.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1 - z}{y} + \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{0.5}{y} + \frac{\color{blue}{0.5}}{{y}^{2}}\right) \]

      11. unpow2 63.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1 - z}{y} + \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{0.5}{y} + \frac{0.5}{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 - z}{y} + \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{0.5}{y} + \frac{0.5}{y \cdot y}\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(1 + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) - z}{y}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate--l+ 65.5%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + \left(0.5 \cdot {z}^{2} - z\right)}}{y} \]

       2. unpow2 65.5%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} - z\right)}{y} \]

   12. Simplified 65.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + \left(0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) - z\right)}{y}} \]

   13. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{{z}^{2}}{y}} \]
   14. Step-by-step derivation

       1. unpow2 65.5%

          \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}}{y} \]

   15. Simplified 65.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{z \cdot z}{y}} \]

   if -1.5999999999999999e167 < z

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{z \cdot z}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 67.4% accurate, 29.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 26000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.8e-57) x (if (<= y 26000000000000.0) (/ 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.8e-57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 26000000000000.0) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.8d-57)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 26000000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.8e-57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 26000000000000.0) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.8e-57:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 26000000000000.0:
		tmp = 1.0 / y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.8e-57)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 26000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.8e-57)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 26000000000000.0)
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.8e-57], x, If[LessEqual[y, 26000000000000.0], N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.7999999999999997e-57 or 2.6e13 < y

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.7999999999999997e-57 < y < 2.6e13

   1. Initial program 76.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 26000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 84.5% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 82.9%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. sqr-pow 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

   3. sqr-pow 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   4. +-commutative 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 85.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

5. Final simplification 85.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \]

Alternative 7: 49.1% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 82.9%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. sqr-pow 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

   3. sqr-pow 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   4. +-commutative 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 47.0%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 91.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y)))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))