Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 69.5% → 98.9%

Time: 8.6s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 69.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.4) (not (<= z 3.1e-14)))
   (+ x (/ y (- 14.431876219268936 (/ 15.646356830292042 z))))
   (+ x (/ y (+ (* z 0.39999999996247915) 12.000000000000014)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.4d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.1d-14))) then
        tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936d0 - (15.646356830292042d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915d0) + 12.000000000000014d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.4) or not (z <= 3.1e-14):
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(14.431876219268936 - Float64(15.646356830292042 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || ~((z <= 3.1e-14)))
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.1e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / N[(14.431876219268936 - N[(15.646356830292042 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(z * 0.39999999996247915), $MachinePrecision] + 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004 or 3.10000000000000004e-14 < z

   1. Initial program 44.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \color{blue}{\frac{15.646356830292042 \cdot 1}{z}}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{\color{blue}{15.646356830292042}}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.10000000000000004e-14

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0.39999999996247915 \cdot z + 12.000000000000014}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      5e+302)
   (fma
    y
    (/
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
    x)
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 5e+302) {
		tmp = fma(y, (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 5e+302)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e+302], N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 5e302

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]

   if 5e302 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - 0.004801250986110448 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      5e+302)
   (+
    x
    (/
     y
     (/
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304)
      (fma
       (/
        (- 0.24180012482592123 (* 0.004801250986110448 (* z z)))
        (- 0.4917317610505968 (* z 0.0692910599291889)))
       z
       0.279195317918525))))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 5e+302) {
		tmp = x + (y / (fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304) / fma(((0.24180012482592123 - (0.004801250986110448 * (z * z))) / (0.4917317610505968 - (z * 0.0692910599291889))), z, 0.279195317918525)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 5e+302)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304) / fma(Float64(Float64(0.24180012482592123 - Float64(0.004801250986110448 * Float64(z * z))) / Float64(0.4917317610505968 - Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889))), z, 0.279195317918525))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e+302], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(0.24180012482592123 - N[(0.004801250986110448 * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(0.4917317610505968 - N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 5e302

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

      3. flip-+ 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.4917317610505968 \cdot 0.4917317610505968 - \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{0.24180012482592123} - \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)}}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

      7. swap-sqr 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - \color{blue}{0.004801250986110448} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.24180012482592123 - 0.004801250986110448 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   if 5e302 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 7.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0.24180012482592123 - 0.004801250986110448 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}{0.4917317610505968 - z \cdot 0.0692910599291889}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.8% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.4) (not (<= z 3.1e-14)))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))
   (+ x (/ y (+ (* z 0.39999999996247915) 12.000000000000014)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.4d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.1d-14))) then
        tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915d0) + 12.000000000000014d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.4) or not (z <= 3.1e-14):
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || ~((z <= 3.1e-14)))
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	else
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.1e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(z * 0.39999999996247915), $MachinePrecision] + 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004 or 3.10000000000000004e-14 < z

   1. Initial program 44.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.10000000000000004e-14

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0.39999999996247915 \cdot z + 12.000000000000014}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.4) (not (<= z 3.1e-14)))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))
   (+ x (/ y 12.000000000000014))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.4d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.1d-14))) then
        tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.4) or not (z <= 3.1e-14):
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.1e-14))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 12.000000000000014));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || ~((z <= 3.1e-14)))
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	else
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.1e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004 or 3.10000000000000004e-14 < z

   1. Initial program 44.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.10000000000000004e-14

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 61.4% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6e+70)
   (* y 0.08333333333333323)
   (if (<= y 1.65e+40) x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6e+70) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (y <= 1.65e+40) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-6d+70)) then
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    else if (y <= 1.65d+40) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6e+70) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else if (y <= 1.65e+40) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -6e+70:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	elif y <= 1.65e+40:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6e+70)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	elseif (y <= 1.65e+40)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -6e+70)
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	elseif (y <= 1.65e+40)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6e+70], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.65e+40], x, N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.99999999999999952e70 or 1.6499999999999999e40 < y

   1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 61.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0.39999999996247915 \cdot z + 12.000000000000014}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{0.39999999996247915 \cdot z + 12.000000000000014}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 52.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 52.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]

   8. Simplified 52.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]

   if -5.99999999999999952e70 < y < 1.6499999999999999e40

   1. Initial program 76.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 61.5% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.3e+85)
   (/ y 12.000000000000014)
   (if (<= y 2.6e+39) x (/ y 12.000000000000014))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.3e+85) {
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014;
	} else if (y <= 2.6e+39) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2.3d+85)) then
        tmp = y / 12.000000000000014d0
    else if (y <= 2.6d+39) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y / 12.000000000000014d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.3e+85) {
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014;
	} else if (y <= 2.6e+39) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.3e+85:
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014
	elif y <= 2.6e+39:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.3e+85)
		tmp = Float64(y / 12.000000000000014);
	elseif (y <= 2.6e+39)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y / 12.000000000000014);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.3e+85)
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014;
	elseif (y <= 2.6e+39)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y / 12.000000000000014;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.3e+85], N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.6e+39], x, N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.2999999999999999e85 or 2.6e39 < y

   1. Initial program 63.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 79.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 61.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0.39999999996247915 \cdot z + 12.000000000000014}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{0.39999999996247915 \cdot z + 12.000000000000014}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 52.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]

   if -2.2999999999999999e85 < y < 2.6e39

   1. Initial program 76.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-def 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+85}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 80.2% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ y 12.000000000000014)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / 12.000000000000014d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / 12.000000000000014)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / 12.000000000000014))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.9%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 77.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

   2. fma-def 77.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

   3. fma-def 77.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. fma-def 77.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 77.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.6%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]

5. Final simplification 79.6%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014} \]

Alternative 9: 51.7% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.9%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-*r/ 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-def 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   5. fma-def 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-def 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-def 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 77.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 49.6%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -8120153.652456675) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304)))) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))