System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.6%

Time: 6.9s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + \left(y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right) - y \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x 0.5) (- (* y (+ 1.0 (log z))) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + ((y * (1.0 + log(z))) - (y * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + ((y * (1.0d0 + log(z))) - (y * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + ((y * (1.0 + Math.log(z))) - (y * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + ((y * (1.0 + math.log(z))) - (y * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z))) - Float64(y * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + ((y * (1.0 + log(z))) - (y * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + \left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right) - y \cdot z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 84.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+122}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.2e+63) (not (<= y 3e+122)))
   (* y (- (+ 1.0 (log z)) z))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+63) || !(y <= 3e+122)) {
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + log(z)) - z);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8.2d+63)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3d+122))) then
        tmp = y * ((1.0d0 + log(z)) - z)
    else
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+63) || !(y <= 3e+122)) {
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + Math.log(z)) - z);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8.2e+63) or not (y <= 3e+122):
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + math.log(z)) - z)
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.2e+63) || !(y <= 3e+122))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 + log(z)) - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8.2e+63) || ~((y <= 3e+122)))
		tmp = y * ((1.0 + log(z)) - z);
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.2e+63], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3e+122]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.19999999999999985e63 or 2.99999999999999986e122 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\log z - z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. distribute-neg-in 93.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) + \left(-\log z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. remove-double-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(-\log z\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      9. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(z - \log z\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 93.0%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(z - \log z\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 93.0%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)} \]

   if -8.19999999999999985e63 < y < 2.99999999999999986e122

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+122}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\left(1 + \log z\right) - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \log z + \left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.28) (+ (* y (log z)) (+ (* x 0.5) y)) (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (y * log(z)) + ((x * 0.5) + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 0.28d0) then
        tmp = (y * log(z)) + ((x * 0.5d0) + y)
    else
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (y * Math.log(z)) + ((x * 0.5) + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 0.28:
		tmp = (y * math.log(z)) + ((x * 0.5) + y)
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * log(z)) + Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = (y * log(z)) + ((x * 0.5) + y);
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.28], N[(N[(y * N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 0.28000000000000003

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \log z + \left(0.5 \cdot x + y\right)} \]

   if 0.28000000000000003 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 98.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 98.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \log z + \left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (log z) (- 1.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0d0 - z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (Math.log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (math.log(z) + (1.0 - z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(log(z) + Float64(1.0 - z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 73.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+196}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 3.4e+196) (- (* x 0.5) (* y z)) (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.4e+196) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3.4d+196) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 + log(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.4e+196) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + Math.log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.4e+196:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 + math.log(z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.4e+196)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.4e+196)
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3.4e+196], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.4e196

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 82.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 82.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   if 3.4e196 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. mul-1-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\log z - z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. distribute-neg-in 95.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) + \left(-\log z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. remove-double-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(-\log z\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      9. sub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(z - \log z\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. metadata-eval 95.1%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(z - \log z\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 95.1%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+196}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 74.6% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 78.3%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

4. Simplified 78.3%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 78.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

7. Final simplification 78.3%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \]

Alternative 7: 58.9% accurate, 18.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 8.2e+55) (* x 0.5) (* y (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 8.2e+55) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 8.2d+55) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = y * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 8.2e+55) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 8.2e+55:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = y * -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 8.2e+55)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 8.2e+55)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = y * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 8.2e+55], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 8.19999999999999962e55

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if 8.19999999999999962e55 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + \left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 40.7% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 44.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

3. Final simplification 44.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]

Alternative 9: 1.8% accurate, 111.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-lft-in 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

   4. *-rgt-identity 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

   6. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   8. unsub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 56.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

   3. sub-neg 56.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\log z - z\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. mul-1-neg 56.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\log z - z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 56.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 56.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. distribute-neg-in 56.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) + \left(-\log z\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. remove-double-neg 56.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(-\log z\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   9. sub-neg 56.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(z - \log z\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]

   10. metadata-eval 56.8%

       \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(\left(z - \log z\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]

   11. +-commutative 56.8%

       \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)}\right) \]

6. Simplified 56.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \left(z - \log z\right)\right)\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 35.2%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + \color{blue}{z}\right)\right) \]

8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 2.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

9. Final simplification 2.0%

   \[\leadsto y \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023240 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))