Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 99.0%
Time: 9.4s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 25.2% accurate, 2.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log s) (log PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (logf(s) - logf(((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(log(s) - log(Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (log(s) - log(single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \left(-4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.5, -0.25\right)\right)\right) - \log s\right)}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right) \]

Alternative 3: 25.2% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ s PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * logf((s / ((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(s / Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * log((s / single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log s + \log \left(-4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.5, -0.25\right)\right)\right) - \log s\right)}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{s}\right) - \log \pi\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log-rec25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)} - \log \pi\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \log s\right)} - \log \pi\right) \]
    3. mul-1-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right) - \log \pi\right) \]
    4. remove-double-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\log s} - \log \pi\right) \]
    5. log-div25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)} \]
  10. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 14.4% accurate, 6.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - u \cdot 0.5\right)}{s}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= s 9.999999682655225e-21)
   (* s 0.0)
   (* s (* -4.0 (/ (* PI (- 0.25 (* u 0.5))) s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float tmp;
	if (s <= 9.999999682655225e-21f) {
		tmp = s * 0.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = s * (-4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * (0.25f - (u * 0.5f))) / s));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (s <= Float32(9.999999682655225e-21))
		tmp = Float32(s * Float32(0.0));
	else
		tmp = Float32(s * Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) - Float32(u * Float32(0.5)))) / s)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (s <= single(9.999999682655225e-21))
		tmp = s * single(0.0);
	else
		tmp = s * (single(-4.0) * ((single(pi) * (single(0.25) - (u * single(0.5)))) / s));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\
\;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - u \cdot 0.5\right)}{s}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if s < 9.99999968e-21

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg99.0%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 14.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{1}\right) \]

    if 9.99999968e-21 < s

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg99.0%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 27.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative27.6%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
      2. log1p-udef27.6%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
      3. expm1-log1p-u27.6%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
      4. *-rgt-identity27.6%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \cdot 1}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
      5. *-rgt-identity27.6%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
      6. div-inv27.6%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. Applied egg-rr27.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    7. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\left(0.5 \cdot u - 0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}}\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification14.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - u \cdot 0.5\right)}{s}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 14.4% accurate, 6.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= s 9.999999682655225e-21)
   (* s 0.0)
   (* 4.0 (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float tmp;
	if (s <= 9.999999682655225e-21f) {
		tmp = s * 0.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (s <= Float32(9.999999682655225e-21))
		tmp = Float32(s * Float32(0.0));
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (s <= single(9.999999682655225e-21))
		tmp = s * single(0.0);
	else
		tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\
\;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if s < 9.99999968e-21

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg99.0%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 14.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{1}\right) \]

    if 9.99999968e-21 < s

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg99.0%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate--r+15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-out--15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
      4. *-commutative15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
      5. metadata-eval15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
      6. metadata-eval15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
      7. *-commutative15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    6. Simplified15.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*l*15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
      2. distribute-lft-out15.3%

        \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
    8. Applied egg-rr15.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification14.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 14.2% accurate, 7.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\pi\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= s 9.999999682655225e-21) (* s 0.0) (- PI)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float tmp;
	if (s <= 9.999999682655225e-21f) {
		tmp = s * 0.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = -((float) M_PI);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (s <= Float32(9.999999682655225e-21))
		tmp = Float32(s * Float32(0.0));
	else
		tmp = Float32(-Float32(pi));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (s <= single(9.999999682655225e-21))
		tmp = s * single(0.0);
	else
		tmp = -single(pi);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\
\;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-\pi\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if s < 9.99999968e-21

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg99.0%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 14.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{1}\right) \]

    if 9.99999968e-21 < s

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg99.0%

        \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 14.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg14.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
    6. Simplified14.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification14.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 9.999999682655225 \cdot 10^{-21}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\pi\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 11.5% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg11.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification11.2%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023238 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))