Diagrams.Color.HSV:lerp from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 97.9% → 100.0%

Time: 4.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.3×

• 20.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((1.0d0 - x) * y) + (x * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * y) + Float64(x * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((1.0d0 - x) * y) + (x * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * y) + Float64(x * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((1.0 - x) * y) + (x * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (- z y) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (z - y), y);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(z - y), y)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.1%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-rgt1-in 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   4. associate-+l+ 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

   6. *-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   7. neg-mul-1 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   8. associate-*r* 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   9. *-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right) \]

Alternative 2: 59.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+248}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (- x))))
   (if (<= x -1.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= x 4.2e-124) y (if (<= x 5.5e+248) (* x z) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * -x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 4.2e-124) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (x <= 5.5e+248) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * -x
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 4.2d-124) then
        tmp = y
    else if (x <= 5.5d+248) then
        tmp = x * z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * -x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 4.2e-124) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (x <= 5.5e+248) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * -x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 4.2e-124:
		tmp = y
	elif x <= 5.5e+248:
		tmp = x * z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(-x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 4.2e-124)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (x <= 5.5e+248)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * -x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 4.2e-124)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (x <= 5.5e+248)
		tmp = x * z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 4.2e-124], y, If[LessEqual[x, 5.5e+248], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 5.4999999999999996e248 < x

   1. Initial program 90.2%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 71.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot x} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 71.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -1 < x < 4.2000000000000002e-124

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

   if 4.2000000000000002e-124 < x < 5.4999999999999996e248

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+248}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 78.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{-45} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+78}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.16e-45) (not (<= z 3.1e+78))) (* x (- z y)) (* y (- 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.16e-45) || !(z <= 3.1e+78)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.16d-45)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.1d+78))) then
        tmp = x * (z - y)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.16e-45) || !(z <= 3.1e+78)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.16e-45) or not (z <= 3.1e+78):
		tmp = x * (z - y)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.16e-45) || !(z <= 3.1e+78))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.16e-45) || ~((z <= 3.1e+78)))
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.16e-45], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.1e+78]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.16000000000000002e-45 or 3.1e78 < z

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.16000000000000002e-45 < z < 3.1e78

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{-45} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+78}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.0))) (* x (- z y)) (+ y (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z - y)
    else
        tmp = y + (x * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = x * (z - y)
	else:
		tmp = y + (x * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + Float64(x * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = x * (z - y);
	else
		tmp = y + (x * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

      4. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      7. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      8. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x + y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 66.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot z - y \cdot y}{z + y}} \cdot x + y \]

      2. associate-*l/ 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot z - y \cdot y\right) \cdot x}{z + y}} + y \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot z - y \cdot y\right) \cdot x}{z + y}} + y \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{z}^{2}} \cdot x}{z + y} + y \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 75.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot x}{z + y} + y \]

   9. Simplified 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot x}{z + y} + y \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 72.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.25e-44) (* x z) (if (<= z 3e+155) (* y (- 1.0 x)) (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e-44) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= 3e+155) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.25d-44)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (z <= 3d+155) then
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - x)
    else
        tmp = x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e-44) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= 3e+155) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.25e-44:
		tmp = x * z
	elif z <= 3e+155:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x)
	else:
		tmp = x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.25e-44)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (z <= 3e+155)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.25e-44)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (z <= 3e+155)
		tmp = y * (1.0 - x);
	else
		tmp = x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.25e-44], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3e+155], N[(y * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.2500000000000001e-44 or 3.0000000000000001e155 < z

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -1.2500000000000001e-44 < z < 3.0000000000000001e155

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 55.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.6e-59) (* x z) (if (<= z 4.5e+15) y (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.6e-59) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= 4.5e+15) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.6d-59)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (z <= 4.5d+15) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.6e-59) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= 4.5e+15) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.6e-59:
		tmp = x * z
	elif z <= 4.5e+15:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.6e-59)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (z <= 4.5e+15)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.6e-59)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (z <= 4.5e+15)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.6e-59], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 4.5e+15], y, N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.6e-59 or 4.5e15 < z

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -3.6e-59 < z < 4.5e15

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y + x \cdot \left(z - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ y (* x (- z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + (x * (z - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y + (x * (z - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y + (x * (z - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y + (x * (z - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y + Float64(x * Float64(z - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y + (x * (z - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y + N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.1%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-rgt1-in 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-x\right) \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot z \]

   4. associate-+l+ 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y} \]

   6. *-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   7. neg-mul-1 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   8. associate-*r* 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot z\right) + y \]

   9. *-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(y \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + y \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot -1 + z\right)} + y \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y \cdot -1 + z, y\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z + y \cdot -1}, y\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}, y\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}, y\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{z - y}, y\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z - y, y\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - y\right) \cdot x + y} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto y + x \cdot \left(z - y\right) \]

Alternative 8: 37.0% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.1%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) \cdot y + x \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 34.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

3. Final simplification 34.7%

   \[\leadsto y \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y - x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- y (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y - (x * (y - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y - (x * (y - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y - (x * (y - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y - Float64(x * Float64(y - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y - (x * (y - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y - N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023238 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Color.HSV:lerp  from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- y (* x (- y z)))

  (+ (* (- 1.0 x) y) (* x z)))