Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 90.1% → 96.2%

Time: 7.4s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.9×

• 49.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+242}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 1e+242)
   (fma x x (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0)))
   (- (* x x) (* z (* z (* y 4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+242) {
		tmp = fma(x, x, (((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e+242)
		tmp = fma(x, x, Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * 4.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+242], N[(x * x + N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1.00000000000000005e242

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.00000000000000005e242 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 68.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 68.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 68.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 68.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 68.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) \]

      4. associate-*r* 90.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]

      5. *-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]

   4. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+242}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 77.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-62} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot x \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+27}\right) \land x \cdot x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+254}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x x) 1.25e-62)
         (and (not (<= (* x x) 2.1e+27)) (<= (* x x) 5.5e+254)))
   (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0))
   (* x x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * x) <= 1.25e-62) || (!((x * x) <= 2.1e+27) && ((x * x) <= 5.5e+254))) {
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * x) <= 1.25d-62) .or. (.not. ((x * x) <= 2.1d+27)) .and. ((x * x) <= 5.5d+254)) then
        tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * (-4.0d0))
    else
        tmp = x * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * x) <= 1.25e-62) || (!((x * x) <= 2.1e+27) && ((x * x) <= 5.5e+254))) {
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * x) <= 1.25e-62) or (not ((x * x) <= 2.1e+27) and ((x * x) <= 5.5e+254)):
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)
	else:
		tmp = x * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * x) <= 1.25e-62) || (!(Float64(x * x) <= 2.1e+27) && (Float64(x * x) <= 5.5e+254)))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * x) <= 1.25e-62) || (~(((x * x) <= 2.1e+27)) && ((x * x) <= 5.5e+254)))
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0);
	else
		tmp = x * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 1.25e-62], And[N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 2.1e+27]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 5.5e+254]]], N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x x) < 1.25e-62 or 2.09999999999999995e27 < (*.f64 x x) < 5.50000000000000004e254

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\left({z}^{2} - t\right) \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left({z}^{2} - t\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 75.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left({z}^{2} - t\right)\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. unpow2 75.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot z} - t\right)\right) \cdot -4 \]

      4. *-commutative 75.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      5. associate-*l* 75.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   if 1.25e-62 < (*.f64 x x) < 2.09999999999999995e27 or 5.50000000000000004e254 < (*.f64 x x)

   1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-62} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot x \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+27}\right) \land x \cdot x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+254}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 89.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+292}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 1e+20)
   (- (* x x) (* t (* y -4.0)))
   (if (<= (* z z) 2e+292)
     (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* (* z z) y)))
     (* z (* z (* y -4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+20) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	} else if ((z * z) <= 2e+292) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * ((z * z) * y));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 1d+20) then
        tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * (-4.0d0)))
    else if ((z * z) <= 2d+292) then
        tmp = (x * x) - (4.0d0 * ((z * z) * y))
    else
        tmp = z * (z * (y * (-4.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+20) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	} else if ((z * z) <= 2e+292) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * ((z * z) * y));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 1e+20:
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0))
	elif (z * z) <= 2e+292:
		tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * ((z * z) * y))
	else:
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e+20)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(t * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	elseif (Float64(z * z) <= 2e+292)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(Float64(z * z) * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+20)
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	elseif ((z * z) <= 2e+292)
		tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * ((z * z) * y));
	else
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+20], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+292], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1e20

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   if 1e20 < (*.f64 z z) < 2e292

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 87.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 87.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 87.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) \]

      4. associate-*r* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]

      5. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]

   4. Simplified 88.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \cdot 4} \]

      2. unpow2 87.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \cdot 4 \]

   7. Simplified 87.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot 4} \]

   if 2e292 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 63.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 65.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 65.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 65.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \cdot 4} \]

      4. unpow2 65.8%

         \[\leadsto -\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \cdot 4 \]

      5. *-commutative 65.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot 4 \]

      6. associate-*r* 65.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)} \]

      7. associate-*l* 85.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      10. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.7%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval 85.7%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   4. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+292}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 85.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 2e+35)
   (- (* x x) (* t (* y -4.0)))
   (if (<= (* z z) 1e+212)
     (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0))
     (* z (* z (* y -4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+35) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	} else if ((z * z) <= 1e+212) {
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 2d+35) then
        tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * (-4.0d0)))
    else if ((z * z) <= 1d+212) then
        tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * (-4.0d0))
    else
        tmp = z * (z * (y * (-4.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+35) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	} else if ((z * z) <= 1e+212) {
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 2e+35:
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0))
	elif (z * z) <= 1e+212:
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)
	else:
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 2e+35)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(t * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	elseif (Float64(z * z) <= 1e+212)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+35)
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	elseif ((z * z) <= 1e+212)
		tmp = ((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0);
	else
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+35], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+212], N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1.9999999999999999e35

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e35 < (*.f64 z z) < 9.9999999999999991e211

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\left({z}^{2} - t\right) \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left({z}^{2} - t\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left({z}^{2} - t\right)\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. unpow2 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot z} - t\right)\right) \cdot -4 \]

      4. *-commutative 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      5. associate-*l* 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   if 9.9999999999999991e211 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 69.7%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 69.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \cdot 4} \]

      4. unpow2 69.7%

         \[\leadsto -\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \cdot 4 \]

      5. *-commutative 69.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot 4 \]

      6. associate-*r* 69.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)} \]

      7. associate-*l* 85.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      10. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.4%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval 85.4%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   4. Simplified 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 95.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 1e+212)
   (+ (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z))))
   (- (* x x) (* z (* z (* y 4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+212) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 1d+212) then
        tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0d0) * (t - (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+212) {
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 1e+212:
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e+212)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * 4.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+212)
		tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+212], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 9.9999999999999991e211

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   if 9.9999999999999991e211 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 69.7%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 69.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 69.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 69.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) \]

      4. associate-*r* 89.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]

      5. *-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]

   4. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 44.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-242}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-52} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+98}\right) \land x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;-4 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 1.35e-242)
   (* t (* y 4.0))
   (if (or (<= x 2.9e-52) (and (not (<= x 6.5e+98)) (<= x 3.3e+126)))
     (* -4.0 (* (* z z) y))
     (* x x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 1.35e-242) {
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0);
	} else if ((x <= 2.9e-52) || (!(x <= 6.5e+98) && (x <= 3.3e+126))) {
		tmp = -4.0 * ((z * z) * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 1.35d-242) then
        tmp = t * (y * 4.0d0)
    else if ((x <= 2.9d-52) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.5d+98)) .and. (x <= 3.3d+126)) then
        tmp = (-4.0d0) * ((z * z) * y)
    else
        tmp = x * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 1.35e-242) {
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0);
	} else if ((x <= 2.9e-52) || (!(x <= 6.5e+98) && (x <= 3.3e+126))) {
		tmp = -4.0 * ((z * z) * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 1.35e-242:
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0)
	elif (x <= 2.9e-52) or (not (x <= 6.5e+98) and (x <= 3.3e+126)):
		tmp = -4.0 * ((z * z) * y)
	else:
		tmp = x * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 1.35e-242)
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(y * 4.0));
	elseif ((x <= 2.9e-52) || (!(x <= 6.5e+98) && (x <= 3.3e+126)))
		tmp = Float64(-4.0 * Float64(Float64(z * z) * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 1.35e-242)
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0);
	elseif ((x <= 2.9e-52) || (~((x <= 6.5e+98)) && (x <= 3.3e+126)))
		tmp = -4.0 * ((z * z) * y);
	else
		tmp = x * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, 1.35e-242], N[(t * N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, 2.9e-52], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.5e+98]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 3.3e+126]]], N[(-4.0 * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < 1.35e-242

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 29.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 29.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot t} \]

   4. Simplified 29.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot t} \]

   if 1.35e-242 < x < 2.9000000000000002e-52 or 6.4999999999999999e98 < x < 3.30000000000000013e126

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 60.5%

         \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   4. Simplified 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.9000000000000002e-52 < x < 6.4999999999999999e98 or 3.30000000000000013e126 < x

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 77.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 48.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-242}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-52} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+98}\right) \land x \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;-4 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 90.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 1e+20)
   (- (* x x) (* t (* y -4.0)))
   (- (* x x) (* z (* z (* y 4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+20) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 1d+20) then
        tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * (-4.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+20) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 1e+20:
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0))
	else:
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e+20)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(t * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * 4.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+20)
		tmp = (x * x) - (t * (y * -4.0));
	else
		tmp = (x * x) - (z * (z * (y * 4.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+20], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1e20

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   if 1e20 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 79.2%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 75.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) \]

      4. associate-*r* 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]

      5. *-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]

   4. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - t \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 61.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 2e+35) (* x x) (* z (* z (* y -4.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+35) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 2d+35) then
        tmp = x * x
    else
        tmp = z * (z * (y * (-4.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+35) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 2e+35:
		tmp = x * x
	else:
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 2e+35)
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+35)
		tmp = x * x;
	else
		tmp = z * (z * (y * -4.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+35], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1.9999999999999999e35

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 60.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e35 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 65.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 65.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 65.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) \cdot 4} \]

      4. unpow2 65.5%

         \[\leadsto -\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \cdot 4 \]

      5. *-commutative 65.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y\right)} \cdot 4 \]

      6. associate-*r* 65.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)} \]

      7. associate-*l* 76.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-z \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-neg-in 76.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)\right)} \]

      10. distribute-rgt-neg-in 76.0%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval 76.0%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   4. Simplified 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 45.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 2.5e-69) (* t (* y 4.0)) (* x x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 2.5e-69) {
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 2.5d-69) then
        tmp = t * (y * 4.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 2.5e-69) {
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 2.5e-69:
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0)
	else:
		tmp = x * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 2.5e-69)
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(y * 4.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 2.5e-69)
		tmp = t * (y * 4.0);
	else
		tmp = x * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, 2.5e-69], N[(t * N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 2.50000000000000017e-69

   1. Initial program 88.6%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 32.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 32.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot t} \]

   4. Simplified 32.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot y\right) \cdot t} \]

   if 2.50000000000000017e-69 < x

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(y \cdot 4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 41.7% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.7%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 44.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 44.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

4. Simplified 44.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

5. Final simplification 44.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x \]

Developer target: 90.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - (4.0d0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(y * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023238 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t))))

  (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))