Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.6% → 98.4%

Time: 7.5s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 42.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+84} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.8e+84) (not (<= y 1.3e-66)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (pow (exp y) (log (/ y (+ y z)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.8e+84) || !(y <= 1.3e-66)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow(exp(y), log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.8d+84)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.3d-66))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + ((exp(y) ** log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.8e+84) || !(y <= 1.3e-66)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(Math.exp(y), Math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.8e+84) or not (y <= 1.3e-66):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(math.exp(y), math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.8e+84) || !(y <= 1.3e-66))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((exp(y) ^ log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z)))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.8e+84) || ~((y <= 1.3e-66)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + ((exp(y) ^ log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.8e+84], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.3e-66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[Exp[y], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.7999999999999999e84 or 1.2999999999999999e-66 < y

   1. Initial program 80.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-prod 80.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. rem-exp-log 80.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}^{y}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 80.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -4.7999999999999999e84 < y < 1.2999999999999999e-66

   1. Initial program 81.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+84} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 98.3% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -6000000.0) (not (<= y 1.3e-66)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6000000.0) || !(y <= 1.3e-66)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-6000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.3d-66))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6000000.0) || !(y <= 1.3e-66)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -6000000.0) or not (y <= 1.3e-66):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -6000000.0) || !(y <= 1.3e-66))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -6000000.0) || ~((y <= 1.3e-66)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -6000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.3e-66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6e6 or 1.2999999999999999e-66 < y

   1. Initial program 83.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-prod 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. rem-exp-log 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}^{y}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -6e6 < y < 1.2999999999999999e-66

   1. Initial program 76.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 87.3% accurate, 12.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -14000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\frac{1}{y} \cdot \left(1 - z \cdot z\right)}{z + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -14000000000.0)
   (+ x (/ (* (/ 1.0 y) (- 1.0 (* z z))) (+ z 1.0)))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -14000000000.0) {
		tmp = x + (((1.0 / y) * (1.0 - (z * z))) / (z + 1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-14000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + (((1.0d0 / y) * (1.0d0 - (z * z))) / (z + 1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -14000000000.0) {
		tmp = x + (((1.0 / y) * (1.0 - (z * z))) / (z + 1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -14000000000.0:
		tmp = x + (((1.0 / y) * (1.0 - (z * z))) / (z + 1.0))
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -14000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z * z))) / Float64(z + 1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -14000000000.0)
		tmp = x + (((1.0 / y) * (1.0 - (z * z))) / (z + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -14000000000.0], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.4e10

   1. Initial program 87.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + 1}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 66.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + -1 \cdot z}}{y} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 66.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}}{y} \]

      3. unsub-neg 66.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 - z}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 66.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 - z}}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 66.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{y}{1 - z}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 66.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 66.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 81.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot 1 - z \cdot z}{1 + z}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{y} \cdot \left(1 \cdot 1 - z \cdot z\right)}{1 + z}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 81.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\frac{1}{y} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} - z \cdot z\right)}{1 + z} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 81.6%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{y} \cdot \left(1 - z \cdot z\right)}{1 + z}} \]

   if -1.4e10 < y

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. sqr-pow 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

      3. sqr-pow 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      4. +-commutative 90.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -14000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\frac{1}{y} \cdot \left(1 - z \cdot z\right)}{z + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 84.7% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 80.9%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. sqr-pow 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

   3. sqr-pow 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   4. +-commutative 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 89.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

5. Final simplification 83.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \]

Alternative 5: 49.6% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 80.9%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. sqr-pow 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}{2}\right)}}}{y} \]

   3. sqr-pow 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   4. +-commutative 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 89.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + 1}}{y} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 65.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + -1 \cdot z}}{y} \]

   2. mul-1-neg 65.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}}{y} \]

   3. unsub-neg 65.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 - z}}{y} \]

6. Simplified 65.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 - z}}{y} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 49.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1 - z}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   2. expm1-udef 45.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1 - z}{y}\right)} - 1\right)} \]

   3. log1p-udef 45.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{y}\right)}} - 1\right) \]

   4. add-exp-log 61.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{y}\right)} - 1\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 61.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + \frac{1 - z}{y}\right) - 1\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in y around inf 47.4%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{1} - 1\right) \]

10. Final simplification 47.4%

    \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 91.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023238 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y)))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))