Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 3.5s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x 3.0 (fma y 2.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, 3.0, fma(y, 2.0, z));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, 3.0, fma(y, 2.0, z))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 3.0 + N[(y * 2.0 + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   5. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + \left(y + y\right)\right) + z\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right)\right)} \]

   7. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 2 \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   8. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot x} + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   9. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)} + \left(\left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   10. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2 + 1, \left(y + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   11. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{3}, \left(y + y\right) + z\right) \]

   12. count-2 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{y \cdot 2} + z\right) \]

   14. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, z\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 86.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+118} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4e+118) (not (<= z 7.5e+44)))
   (+ z (* x 3.0))
   (+ x (* 2.0 (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4e+118) || !(z <= 7.5e+44)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4d+118)) .or. (.not. (z <= 7.5d+44))) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (2.0d0 * (x + y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4e+118) || !(z <= 7.5e+44)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4e+118) or not (z <= 7.5e+44):
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4e+118) || !(z <= 7.5e+44))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4e+118) || ~((z <= 7.5e+44)))
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4e+118], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 7.5e+44]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.99999999999999987e118 or 7.50000000000000027e44 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + \left(2 \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + z} \]

   if -3.99999999999999987e118 < z < 7.50000000000000027e44

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right) + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+118} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+44}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 53.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.36 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-222}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.36e+23)
   (* y 2.0)
   (if (<= y -5.3e-222) (* x 3.0) (if (<= y 7.6e+64) z (* y 2.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.36e+23) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= -5.3e-222) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 7.6e+64) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.36d+23)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (y <= (-5.3d-222)) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (y <= 7.6d+64) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.36e+23) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= -5.3e-222) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 7.6e+64) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.36e+23:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif y <= -5.3e-222:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif y <= 7.6e+64:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.36e+23)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (y <= -5.3e-222)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (y <= 7.6e+64)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.36e+23)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (y <= -5.3e-222)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (y <= 7.6e+64)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.36e+23], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -5.3e-222], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.6e+64], z, N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.36e23 or 7.6000000000000002e64 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -1.36e23 < y < -5.29999999999999981e-222

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -5.29999999999999981e-222 < y < 7.6000000000000002e64

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.36 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.3 \cdot 10^{-222}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 82.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+210}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6e+88) (not (<= x 7.6e+210))) (+ z (* x 3.0)) (+ z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6e+88) || !(x <= 7.6e+210)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6d+88)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.6d+210))) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6e+88) || !(x <= 7.6e+210)) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6e+88) or not (x <= 7.6e+210):
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6e+88) || !(x <= 7.6e+210))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6e+88) || ~((x <= 7.6e+210)))
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6e+88], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7.6e+210]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.00000000000000011e88 or 7.60000000000000056e210 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + \left(2 \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + z} \]

   if -6.00000000000000011e88 < x < 7.60000000000000056e210

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+88} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+210}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 79.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -4.2e+151)
   (* x 3.0)
   (if (<= x 7.6e+210) (+ z (* y 2.0)) (* x 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.2e+151) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= 7.6e+210) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4.2d+151)) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (x <= 7.6d+210) then
        tmp = z + (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.2e+151) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (x <= 7.6e+210) {
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.2e+151:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif x <= 7.6e+210:
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.2e+151)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (x <= 7.6e+210)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.2e+151)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (x <= 7.6e+210)
		tmp = z + (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.2e+151], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 7.6e+210], N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.2000000000000001e151 or 7.60000000000000056e210 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -4.2000000000000001e151 < x < 7.60000000000000056e210

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (+ z (* 2.0 (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (z + (2.0d0 * (x + y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(z + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 3 + \left(z + y \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 3.0) (+ z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 3.0d0) + (z + (y * 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) + Float64(z + Float64(y * 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 3.0) + (z + (y * 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + \left(2 \cdot y + z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 3 + \left(z + y \cdot 2\right) \]

Alternative 8: 51.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.4e-83) (* y 2.0) (if (<= y 5.8e+64) z (* y 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.4e-83) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 5.8e+64) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2.4d-83)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (y <= 5.8d+64) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.4e-83) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= 5.8e+64) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.4e-83:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif y <= 5.8e+64:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.4e-83)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (y <= 5.8e+64)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.4e-83)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (y <= 5.8e+64)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.4e-83], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 5.8e+64], z, N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.4000000000000001e-83 or 5.79999999999999986e64 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -2.4000000000000001e-83 < y < 5.79999999999999986e64

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 34.3% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 34.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 34.0%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023230 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))