Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 11.2s

Alternatives: 17

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * Math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + z) - Float64(z * log(t))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * Math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + z) - Float64(z * log(t))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (fma z (- 1.0 (log t)) (fma (+ a -0.5) b y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x + fma(z, (1.0 - log(t)), fma((a + -0.5), b, y));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x + fma(z, Float64(1.0 - log(t)), fma(Float64(a + -0.5), b, y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   11. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   13. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   14. unsub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   15. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

   16. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   17. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 89.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (<= t_1 -5e+51)
     (+ (+ y (+ x z)) t_1)
     (if (<= t_1 2e+173) (+ (+ x y) (* z (- 1.0 (log t)))) (+ (+ x y) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+51) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else if (t_1 <= 2e+173) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if (t_1 <= (-5d+51)) then
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
    else if (t_1 <= 2d+173) then
        tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    else
        tmp = (x + y) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+51) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else if (t_1 <= 2e+173) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -5e+51:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
	elif t_1 <= 2e+173:
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+51)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + t_1);
	elseif (t_1 <= 2e+173)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+51)
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	elseif (t_1 <= 2e+173)
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+51], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+173], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -5e51

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   if -5e51 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 2e173

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right) + \left(y + x\right)} \]

   if 2e173 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+173}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 85.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1 + \left(\left(z + y\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (<= x -1.4e+117)
     (+ (+ y (+ x z)) t_1)
     (+ t_1 (- (+ z y) (* z (log t)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.4e+117) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((z + y) - (z * log(t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if (x <= (-1.4d+117)) then
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
    else
        tmp = t_1 + ((z + y) - (z * log(t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.4e+117) {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + ((z + y) - (z * Math.log(t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.4e+117:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_1 + ((z + y) - (z * math.log(t)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.4e+117)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(Float64(z + y) - Float64(z * log(t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.4e+117)
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_1 + ((z + y) - (z * log(t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.4e+117], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 + N[(N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.39999999999999999e117

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   if -1.39999999999999999e117 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) + \left(\left(z + y\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x y) (- z (* z (log t)))) (* (+ a -0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (z - (z * log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + y) + (z - (z * log(t)))) + ((a + (-0.5d0)) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (z - (z * Math.log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + y) + (z - (z * math.log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z - Float64(z * log(t)))) + Float64(Float64(a + -0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + y) + (z - (z * log(t)))) + ((a + -0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot b \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) + \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b \]

Alternative 5: 85.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+212} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+204}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8.5e+212) (not (<= z 1e+204)))
   (+ x (* z (- 1.0 (log t))))
   (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* b (- a 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.5e+212) || !(z <= 1e+204)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-8.5d+212)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1d+204))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    else
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8.5e+212) || !(z <= 1e+204)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -8.5e+212) or not (z <= 1e+204):
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	else:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8.5e+212) || !(z <= 1e+204))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -8.5e+212) || ~((z <= 1e+204)))
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8.5e+212], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1e+204]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.49999999999999979e212 or 9.99999999999999989e203 < z

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 76.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -8.49999999999999979e212 < z < 9.99999999999999989e203

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+212} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+204}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 84.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+212} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+249}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6e+212) (not (<= z 5.8e+249)))
   (* z (- 1.0 (log t)))
   (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* b (- a 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6e+212) || !(z <= 5.8e+249)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - log(t));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-6d+212)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.8d+249))) then
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - log(t))
    else
        tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6e+212) || !(z <= 5.8e+249)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - Math.log(t));
	} else {
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -6e+212) or not (z <= 5.8e+249):
		tmp = z * (1.0 - math.log(t))
	else:
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6e+212) || !(z <= 5.8e+249))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -6e+212) || ~((z <= 5.8e+249)))
		tmp = z * (1.0 - log(t));
	else
		tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6e+212], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.8e+249]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6e212 or 5.80000000000000034e249 < z

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)} \]

   if -6e212 < z < 5.80000000000000034e249

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+212} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+249}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 70.0% accurate, 6.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -5e+65) (not (<= t_1 2e+142))) (+ x t_1) (+ x (+ z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+142)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-5d+65)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 2d+142))) then
        tmp = x + t_1
    else
        tmp = x + (z + y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+142)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+65) or not (t_1 <= 2e+142):
		tmp = x + t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + (z + y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+142))
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z + y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+142)))
		tmp = x + t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + (z + y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+65], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+142]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -4.99999999999999973e65 or 2.0000000000000001e142 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 80.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -4.99999999999999973e65 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 2.0000000000000001e142

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 65.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(z + x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 65.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 65.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 65.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right) + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 64.5% accurate, 6.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -5e+65) (not (<= t_1 2e+152))) t_1 (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+152)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-5d+65)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 2d+152))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+152)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+65) or not (t_1 <= 2e+152):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+152))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+152)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+65], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+152]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -4.99999999999999973e65 or 2.0000000000000001e152 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -4.99999999999999973e65 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 2.0000000000000001e152

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 65.2% accurate, 6.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -5e+65) (not (<= t_1 2e+152))) t_1 (+ x (+ z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+152)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-5d+65)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 2d+152))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x + (z + y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+152)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+65) or not (t_1 <= 2e+152):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + (z + y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || !(t_1 <= 2e+152))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z + y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -5e+65) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+152)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + (z + y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+65], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+152]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, N[(x + N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -4.99999999999999973e65 or 2.0000000000000001e152 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -4.99999999999999973e65 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 2.0000000000000001e152

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 64.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(z + x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 64.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 64.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 64.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right) + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+152}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 57.8% accurate, 8.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-196}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1 + \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (<= (+ x y) 5e-196) (+ x t_1) (+ t_1 (+ z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= 5e-196) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((x + y) <= 5d-196) then
        tmp = x + t_1
    else
        tmp = t_1 + (z + y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= 5e-196) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 + (z + y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= 5e-196:
		tmp = x + t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_1 + (z + y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= 5e-196)
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(z + y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= 5e-196)
		tmp = x + t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_1 + (z + y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], 5e-196], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 + N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < 5.0000000000000005e-196

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 63.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if 5.0000000000000005e-196 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-196}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) + \left(z + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 57.3% accurate, 10.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5)))) (if (<= (+ x y) -5e-156) (+ x t_1) (+ y t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-156) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((x + y) <= (-5d-156)) then
        tmp = x + t_1
    else
        tmp = y + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-156) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -5e-156:
		tmp = x + t_1
	else:
		tmp = y + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -5e-156)
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-156)
		tmp = x + t_1;
	else
		tmp = y + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-156], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -5.00000000000000007e-156

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 62.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -5.00000000000000007e-156 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 79.4% accurate, 10.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* b (- a 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (y + (x + z)) + (b * (a - 0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. pow3 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

5. Final simplification 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 13: 78.6% accurate, 12.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x y) (* b (- a 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 78.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

3. Final simplification 78.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 14: 29.6% accurate, 16.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.4 \cdot 10^{-290}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.4e+83) x (if (<= x 7.4e-290) (* a b) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.4e+83) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 7.4e-290) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.4d+83)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 7.4d-290) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.4e+83) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 7.4e-290) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.4e+83:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 7.4e-290:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.4e+83)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 7.4e-290)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.4e+83)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 7.4e-290)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.4e+83], x, If[LessEqual[x, 7.4e-290], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], y]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.39999999999999991e83

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 58.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.39999999999999991e83 < x < 7.39999999999999954e-290

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 36.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if 7.39999999999999954e-290 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 26.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 36.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.4 \cdot 10^{-290}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 15: 48.8% accurate, 16.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -1.3e+124) (* a b) (if (<= b 5.6e+65) (+ x y) (* -0.5 b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.3e+124) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (b <= 5.6e+65) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= (-1.3d+124)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (b <= 5.6d+65) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = (-0.5d0) * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.3e+124) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (b <= 5.6e+65) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= -1.3e+124:
		tmp = a * b
	elif b <= 5.6e+65:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = -0.5 * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -1.3e+124)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (b <= 5.6e+65)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-0.5 * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= -1.3e+124)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (b <= 5.6e+65)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = -0.5 * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, -1.3e+124], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 5.6e+65], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -1.3e124

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -1.3e124 < b < 5.5999999999999998e65

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 55.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]

   if 5.5999999999999998e65 < b

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - \log t, z, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - \log t, z, \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot b\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - \log t, z, \left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot b\right) \]

   6. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - \log t, z, \left(a + -0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z + \left(-0.5 \cdot b + x\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 42.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 42.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot -0.5} \]

   10. Simplified 42.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot -0.5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 16: 28.9% accurate, 37.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.16:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -0.16) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.16d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.16:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.16], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.160000000000000003

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -0.160000000000000003 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow3 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{3}}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 22.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.16:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 17: 22.1% accurate, 115.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   11. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   13. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   14. unsub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   15. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

   16. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   17. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 23.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 23.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y\right) + \frac{\left(1 - {\log t}^{2}\right) \cdot z}{1 + \log t}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  (+ (+ x y) (/ (* (- 1.0 (pow (log t) 2.0)) z) (+ 1.0 (log t))))
  (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - pow(log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + y) + (((1.0d0 - (log(t) ** 2.0d0)) * z) / (1.0d0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - Math.pow(Math.log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + Math.log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - math.pow(math.log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + math.log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - (log(t) ^ 2.0)) * z) / Float64(1.0 + log(t)))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + y) + (((1.0 - (log(t) ^ 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(1.0 - N[Power[N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023230 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ (+ (+ x y) (/ (* (- 1.0 (pow (log t) 2.0)) z) (+ 1.0 (log t)))) (* (- a 0.5) b))

  (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))