Numeric.SpecFunctions:stirlingError from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.9%

Time: 9.1s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ (- x (* (+ y 0.5) (log y))) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - ((y + 0.5) * log(y))) + y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x - ((y + 0.5d0) * log(y))) + y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - ((y + 0.5) * Math.log(y))) + y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x - ((y + 0.5) * math.log(y))) + y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y + 0.5) * log(y))) + y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x - ((y + 0.5) * log(y))) + y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x - N[(N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ (- x (* (+ y 0.5) (log y))) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - ((y + 0.5) * log(y))) + y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x - ((y + 0.5d0) * log(y))) + y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - ((y + 0.5) * Math.log(y))) + y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x - ((y + 0.5) * math.log(y))) + y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y + 0.5) * log(y))) + y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x - ((y + 0.5) * log(y))) + y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x - N[(N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, -0.5 - y, y\right) - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (- (fma (log y) (- -0.5 y) y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (fma(log(y), (-0.5 - y), y) - z);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(fma(log(y), Float64(-0.5 - y), y) - z))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-0.5 - y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y\right) + \left(-z\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)\right)} + \left(-z\right) \]

   4. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   5. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z\right)} \]

   6. neg-sub0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + y\right) - z\right) \]

   7. associate-+l- 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

   8. neg-sub0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

   9. neg-mul-1 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)} - z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, -0.5 - y, y\right) - z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, -0.5 - y, y\right) - z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \log y \cdot 0.5\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(1 - \log y\right) - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.9e-11)
   (- (- x (* (log y) 0.5)) z)
   (+ x (- (* y (- 1.0 (log y))) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.9e-11) {
		tmp = (x - (log(y) * 0.5)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * (1.0 - log(y))) - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.9d-11) then
        tmp = (x - (log(y) * 0.5d0)) - z
    else
        tmp = x + ((y * (1.0d0 - log(y))) - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.9e-11) {
		tmp = (x - (Math.log(y) * 0.5)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * (1.0 - Math.log(y))) - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.9e-11:
		tmp = (x - (math.log(y) * 0.5)) - z
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y * (1.0 - math.log(y))) - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.9e-11)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(log(y) * 0.5)) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - log(y))) - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.9e-11)
		tmp = (x - (log(y) * 0.5)) - z;
	else
		tmp = x + ((y * (1.0 - log(y))) - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.9e-11], N[(N[(x - N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.9e-11

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - 0.5 \cdot \log y\right)} - z \]

   if 2.9e-11 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y\right) + \left(-z\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)\right)} + \left(-z\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      5. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z\right)} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + y\right) - z\right) \]

      7. associate-+l- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

      9. neg-mul-1 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)} - z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, -0.5 - y, y\right) - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} - z\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-rec 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) - z\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log y\right)} - z\right) \]

   6. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - \log y\right)} - z\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \log y \cdot 0.5\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(1 - \log y\right) - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x - \log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\right) + \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (- x (* (log y) (+ y 0.5))) (- y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - (log(y) * (y + 0.5))) + (y - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x - (log(y) * (y + 0.5d0))) + (y - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - (Math.log(y) * (y + 0.5))) + (y - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x - (math.log(y) * (y + 0.5))) + (y - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x - Float64(log(y) * Float64(y + 0.5))) + Float64(y - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x - (log(y) * (y + 0.5))) + (y - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x - N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(x - \log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\right) + \left(y - z\right) \]

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + \left(x - \log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\right)\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (- x (* (log y) (+ y 0.5)))) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (x - (log(y) * (y + 0.5)))) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (x - (log(y) * (y + 0.5d0)))) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (x - (Math.log(y) * (y + 0.5)))) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (x - (math.log(y) * (y + 0.5)))) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x - Float64(log(y) * Float64(y + 0.5)))) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (x - (log(y) * (y + 0.5)))) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(x - N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]

2. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(y + \left(x - \log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\right)\right) - z \]

Alternative 5: 70.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -58:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 260:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \log y \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -58.0) (- x z) (if (<= z 260.0) (- x (* (log y) 0.5)) (- x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -58.0) {
		tmp = x - z;
	} else if (z <= 260.0) {
		tmp = x - (log(y) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-58.0d0)) then
        tmp = x - z
    else if (z <= 260.0d0) then
        tmp = x - (log(y) * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = x - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -58.0) {
		tmp = x - z;
	} else if (z <= 260.0) {
		tmp = x - (Math.log(y) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -58.0:
		tmp = x - z
	elif z <= 260.0:
		tmp = x - (math.log(y) * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = x - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -58.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - z);
	elseif (z <= 260.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(y) * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -58.0)
		tmp = x - z;
	elseif (z <= 260.0)
		tmp = x - (log(y) * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = x - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -58.0], N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 260.0], N[(x - N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -58 or 260 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      2. pow3 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      3. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}}\right)}^{3}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} - z \]

   if -58 < z < 260

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) - \left(0.5 + y\right) \cdot \log y} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - 0.5 \cdot \log y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\log y \cdot 0.5} \]

   7. Simplified 65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \log y \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -58:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 260:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \log y \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 77.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.5e+40) (- (+ x y) z) (- (* y (- 1.0 (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.5e+40) {
		tmp = (x + y) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.5d+40) then
        tmp = (x + y) - z
    else
        tmp = (y * (1.0d0 - log(y))) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.5e+40) {
		tmp = (x + y) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.5e+40:
		tmp = (x + y) - z
	else:
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - math.log(y))) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.5e+40)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.5e+40)
		tmp = (x + y) - z;
	else
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - log(y))) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.5e+40], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.50000000000000002e40

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      2. pow3 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      3. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}}\right)}^{3}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} - z \]

   if 2.50000000000000002e40 < y

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 20.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) \cdot \left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)}} - z \]

      2. pow3 20.5%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)}^{3}}} - z \]

      3. +-commutative 20.5%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(y + \left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)\right)}}^{3}} - z \]

      4. *-commutative 20.5%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{\left(y + \left(x - \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}\right)\right)}^{3}} - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 20.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\left(y + \left(x - \log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\right)\right)}^{3}}} - z \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 19.7%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{y}^{3} \cdot {\left(1 - -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}^{3}}} - z \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-pow 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{y}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(1 - -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(1 - -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}^{\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)}} - z \]

      2. sqr-pow 19.7%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{y}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(1 - -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}^{3}}} - z \]

      3. log-rec 19.7%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{y}^{3} \cdot {\left(1 - -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right)}^{3}} - z \]

      4. mul-1-neg 19.7%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{y}^{3} \cdot {\left(1 - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}\right)}^{3}} - z \]

      5. remove-double-neg 19.7%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{y}^{3} \cdot {\left(1 - \color{blue}{\log y}\right)}^{3}} - z \]

      6. cube-prod 19.7%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - \log y\right)\right)}^{3}}} - z \]

   6. Simplified 19.7%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - \log y\right)\right)}^{3}}} - z \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log y\right) \cdot y} - z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 77.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - y \cdot \log y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.15e+39) (- (+ x y) z) (- (+ x y) (* y (log y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.15e+39) {
		tmp = (x + y) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.15d+39) then
        tmp = (x + y) - z
    else
        tmp = (x + y) - (y * log(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.15e+39) {
		tmp = (x + y) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * Math.log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.15e+39:
		tmp = (x + y) - z
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * math.log(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.15e+39)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) - Float64(y * log(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.15e+39)
		tmp = (x + y) - z;
	else
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * log(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.15e+39], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.15000000000000006e39

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      2. pow3 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      3. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}}\right)}^{3}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} - z \]

   if 1.15000000000000006e39 < y

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) - \left(0.5 + y\right) \cdot \log y} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 83.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      2. log-rec 83.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 83.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 83.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\log y} \]

   7. Simplified 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \log y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - y \cdot \log y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 89.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \log y \cdot 0.5\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - y \cdot \log y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.08e+46) (- (- x (* (log y) 0.5)) z) (- (+ x y) (* y (log y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.08e+46) {
		tmp = (x - (log(y) * 0.5)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.08d+46) then
        tmp = (x - (log(y) * 0.5d0)) - z
    else
        tmp = (x + y) - (y * log(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.08e+46) {
		tmp = (x - (Math.log(y) * 0.5)) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * Math.log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.08e+46:
		tmp = (x - (math.log(y) * 0.5)) - z
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * math.log(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.08e+46)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(log(y) * 0.5)) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) - Float64(y * log(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.08e+46)
		tmp = (x - (log(y) * 0.5)) - z;
	else
		tmp = (x + y) - (y * log(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.08e+46], N[(N[(x - N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.07999999999999994e46

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - 0.5 \cdot \log y\right)} - z \]

   if 1.07999999999999994e46 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) - \left(0.5 + y\right) \cdot \log y} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      2. log-rec 84.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 84.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 84.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\log y} \]

   7. Simplified 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \log y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \log y \cdot 0.5\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) - y \cdot \log y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 72.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+147}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot \log y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 6.4e+147) (- x z) (- y (* y (log y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.4e+147) {
		tmp = x - z;
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 6.4d+147) then
        tmp = x - z
    else
        tmp = y - (y * log(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.4e+147) {
		tmp = x - z;
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * Math.log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 6.4e+147:
		tmp = x - z
	else:
		tmp = y - (y * math.log(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 6.4e+147)
		tmp = Float64(x - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y - Float64(y * log(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 6.4e+147)
		tmp = x - z;
	else
		tmp = y - (y * log(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 6.4e+147], N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y - N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.39999999999999958e147

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      2. pow3 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

      3. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}}\right)}^{3}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} - z \]

   if 6.39999999999999958e147 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + \left(y - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) - \left(0.5 + y\right) \cdot \log y} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      2. log-rec 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 91.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\log y} \]

   7. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \log y} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      2. log-rec 83.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(1 - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right)\right) \]

      3. remove-double-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\log y}\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\log y\right)\right)} \]

      5. log-rec 83.3%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      6. distribute-rgt-in 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot y + \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right) \cdot y} \]

      7. *-lft-identity 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} + \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right) \cdot y \]

      8. log-rec 83.3%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} \cdot y \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - \log y \cdot y} \]

      10. *-commutative 83.3%

          \[\leadsto y - \color{blue}{y \cdot \log y} \]

   10. Simplified 83.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - y \cdot \log y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+147}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot \log y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 47.8% accurate, 18.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -58:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -58.0) (- z) (if (<= z 4.8e+119) x (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -58.0) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (z <= 4.8e+119) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-58.0d0)) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (z <= 4.8d+119) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -58.0) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (z <= 4.8e+119) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -58.0:
		tmp = -z
	elif z <= 4.8e+119:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -58.0)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (z <= 4.8e+119)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -58.0)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (z <= 4.8e+119)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -58.0], (-z), If[LessEqual[z, 4.8e+119], x, (-z)]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -58 or 4.8e119 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y\right) + \left(-z\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)\right)} + \left(-z\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      5. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z\right)} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + y\right) - z\right) \]

      7. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

      9. neg-mul-1 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)} - z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, -0.5 - y, y\right) - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   6. Simplified 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -58 < z < 4.8e119

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y\right) + \left(-z\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)\right)} + \left(-z\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      5. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z\right)} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + y\right) - z\right) \]

      7. associate-+l- 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

      9. neg-mul-1 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)} - z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, -0.5 - y, y\right) - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -58:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 58.4% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- x z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cube-cbrt 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   2. pow3 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

   3. *-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}}\right)}^{3}\right) + y\right) - z \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\log y \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}\right) + y\right) - z \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} - z \]

5. Final simplification 61.3%

   \[\leadsto x - z \]

Alternative 12: 30.3% accurate, 111.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)\right)} + y\right) + \left(-z\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right)\right)} + \left(-z\right) \]

   4. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   5. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(-\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right) + y\right) - z\right)} \]

   6. neg-sub0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + y\right) - z\right) \]

   7. associate-+l- 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

   8. neg-sub0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)\right)} - z\right) \]

   9. neg-mul-1 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y - y\right)} - z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, -0.5 - y, y\right) - z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 30.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(y + x\right) - z\right) - \left(y + 0.5\right) \cdot \log y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (+ y x) z) (* (+ y 0.5) (log y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((y + x) - z) - ((y + 0.5) * log(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((y + x) - z) - ((y + 0.5d0) * log(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((y + x) - z) - ((y + 0.5) * Math.log(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((y + x) - z) - ((y + 0.5) * math.log(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(y + x) - z) - Float64(Float64(y + 0.5) * log(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((y + x) - z) - ((y + 0.5) * log(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023230 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:stirlingError from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (- (+ y x) z) (* (+ y 0.5) (log y)))

  (- (+ (- x (* (+ y 0.5) (log y))) y) z))