expq3 (problem 3.4.2)

Percentage Accurate: 6.7% → 96.7%

Time: 11.8s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 107.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -2.00000000000000007e154
  2. b = 1.9999999999999999e-154
  3. eps = -1.9999999999999999e-77

Specification

\[-1 < \varepsilon \land \varepsilon < 1\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 6.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{t_0} + -1\right)}{\left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot a} + -1\right) \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} + -1\right)} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(t_0\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* eps (+ a b))))
   (if (<=
        (/
         (* eps (+ (exp t_0) -1.0))
         (* (+ (exp (* eps a)) -1.0) (+ (exp (* eps b)) -1.0)))
        2e-11)
     (/ (* eps (expm1 t_0)) (* (expm1 (* eps a)) (expm1 (* eps b))))
     (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double t_0 = eps * (a + b);
	double tmp;
	if (((eps * (exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / ((exp((eps * a)) + -1.0) * (exp((eps * b)) + -1.0))) <= 2e-11) {
		tmp = (eps * expm1(t_0)) / (expm1((eps * a)) * expm1((eps * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double t_0 = eps * (a + b);
	double tmp;
	if (((eps * (Math.exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / ((Math.exp((eps * a)) + -1.0) * (Math.exp((eps * b)) + -1.0))) <= 2e-11) {
		tmp = (eps * Math.expm1(t_0)) / (Math.expm1((eps * a)) * Math.expm1((eps * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	t_0 = eps * (a + b)
	tmp = 0
	if ((eps * (math.exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / ((math.exp((eps * a)) + -1.0) * (math.exp((eps * b)) + -1.0))) <= 2e-11:
		tmp = (eps * math.expm1(t_0)) / (math.expm1((eps * a)) * math.expm1((eps * b)))
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	t_0 = Float64(eps * Float64(a + b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(eps * a)) + -1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(eps * b)) + -1.0))) <= 2e-11)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(eps * expm1(t_0)) / Float64(expm1(Float64(eps * a)) * expm1(Float64(eps * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(eps * N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(eps * a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(eps * b), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e-11], N[(N[(eps * N[(Exp[t$95$0] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(Exp[N[(eps * a), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision] * N[(Exp[N[(eps * b), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 eps (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a b) eps)) 1)) (*.f64 (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 a eps)) 1) (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 b eps)) 1))) < 1.99999999999999988e-11

   1. Initial program 36.7%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 36.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 36.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      3. expm1-def 60.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 60.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   if 1.99999999999999988e-11 < (/.f64 (*.f64 eps (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a b) eps)) 1)) (*.f64 (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 a eps)) 1) (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 b eps)) 1)))

   1. Initial program 0.4%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 0.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 2.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 2.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 7.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 7.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 32.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 32.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)} + -1\right)}{\left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot a} + -1\right) \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} + -1\right)} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 82.1% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 1.02e+21) (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)) (/ eps (expm1 (* eps a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 1.02e+21) {
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
	} else {
		tmp = eps / expm1((eps * a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 1.02e+21) {
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
	} else {
		tmp = eps / Math.expm1((eps * a));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 1.02e+21:
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)
	else:
		tmp = eps / math.expm1((eps * a))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 1.02e+21)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a));
	else
		tmp = Float64(eps / expm1(Float64(eps * a)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[a, 1.02e+21], N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(eps / N[(Exp[N[(eps * a), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 1.02e21

   1. Initial program 3.8%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 3.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 3.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 14.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 14.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 36.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 36.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 36.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}} \]

   if 1.02e21 < a

   1. Initial program 21.5%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. times-frac 21.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]

      2. expm1-def 30.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      3. *-commutative 30.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      4. expm1-def 30.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      5. *-commutative 30.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right)}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      6. expm1-def 80.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      7. *-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 35.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 94.6% accurate, 45.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / b) + (1.0d0 / a)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 7.5%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 7.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 7.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

   3. expm1-def 9.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 9.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   5. expm1-def 18.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   6. *-commutative 18.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   7. expm1-def 44.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 44.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 44.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}} \]

6. Final simplification 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \]

Alternative 4: 57.9% accurate, 63.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-123}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 2.75e-123) (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.75e-123) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= 2.75d-123) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.75e-123) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= 2.75e-123:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 2.75e-123)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= 2.75e-123)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.75e-123], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 2.75e-123

   1. Initial program 4.4%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 4.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 4.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 6.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 6.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 11.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 11.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 40.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 40.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 40.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 58.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if 2.75e-123 < b

   1. Initial program 12.8%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 12.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 12.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 14.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 14.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 29.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 64.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-123}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 47.9% accurate, 107.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 a))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = 1.0d0 / a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return 1.0 / a

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(1.0 / a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 1.0 / a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 7.5%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 7.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 7.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

   3. expm1-def 9.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 9.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   5. expm1-def 18.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   6. *-commutative 18.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   7. expm1-def 44.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 44.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 44.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 49.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

5. Final simplification 49.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{a} \]

Developer target: 77.7% accurate, 45.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a + b}{a \cdot b} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ (+ a b) (* a b)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (a + b) / (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (a + b) / (a * b)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(a + b) / Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (a + b) / (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023229 
(FPCore (a b eps)
  :name "expq3 (problem 3.4.2)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (< -1.0 eps) (< eps 1.0))

  :herbie-target
  (/ (+ a b) (* a b))

  (/ (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0)) (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))