Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 78.2% → 98.8%

Time: 8.1s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 313.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. wj = -4.9803937183439216e+210
  2. x = -4.1786393618300297e+155

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 78.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{t_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t_0} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right) - wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj))))
   (if (<= (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0))) 2e-12)
     (- (+ (* wj wj) (+ x (* -2.0 (* wj x)))) (* wj (* wj wj)))
     (+ wj (/ (- (/ x (exp wj)) wj) (+ wj 1.0))))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-12) {
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj));
	} else {
		tmp = wj + (((x / exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    if ((wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2d-12) then
        tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + ((-2.0d0) * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj))
    else
        tmp = wj + (((x / exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	double tmp;
	if ((wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-12) {
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj));
	} else {
		tmp = wj + (((x / Math.exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	tmp = 0
	if (wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-12:
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj))
	else:
		tmp = wj + (((x / math.exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-12)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(wj * wj) + Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(wj * x)))) - Float64(wj * Float64(wj * wj)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj + Float64(Float64(Float64(x / exp(wj)) - wj) / Float64(wj + 1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))) <= 2e-12)
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj));
	else
		tmp = wj + (((x / exp(wj)) - wj) / (wj + 1.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e-12], N[(N[(N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(-2.0 * N[(wj * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(wj * N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj + N[(N[(N[(x / N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - wj), $MachinePrecision] / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 1.99999999999999996e-12

   1. Initial program 67.6%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 67.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      2. div-sub 67.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 67.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 67.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 67.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 67.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 67.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      8. div-sub 67.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      9. distribute-rgt1-in 68.2%

         \[\leadsto wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      10. associate-/l/ 68.1%

          \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. Simplified 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{{wj}^{2}} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 98.2%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{{wj}^{3}} + \left(wj \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow3 98.2%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj\right)} + \left(wj \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 98.2%

       \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj\right)} + \left(wj \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   if 1.99999999999999996e-12 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      2. div-sub 92.8%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 92.8%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      8. div-sub 92.8%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      9. distribute-rgt1-in 94.2%

         \[\leadsto wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      10. associate-/l/ 94.2%

          \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right) - wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 97.5% accurate, 16.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 0.0014:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right) - wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= wj 0.0014)
   (- (+ (* wj wj) (+ x (* -2.0 (* wj x)))) (* wj (* wj wj)))
   (- wj (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (wj <= 0.0014) {
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj));
	} else {
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (wj <= 0.0014d0) then
        tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + ((-2.0d0) * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj))
    else
        tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (wj <= 0.0014) {
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj));
	} else {
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	tmp = 0
	if wj <= 0.0014:
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj))
	else:
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (wj <= 0.0014)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(wj * wj) + Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(wj * x)))) - Float64(wj * Float64(wj * wj)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj - Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (wj <= 0.0014)
		tmp = ((wj * wj) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x)))) - (wj * (wj * wj));
	else
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := If[LessEqual[wj, 0.0014], N[(N[(N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(-2.0 * N[(wj * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(wj * N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj - N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if wj < 0.00139999999999999999

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      2. div-sub 75.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 75.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 75.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 75.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 75.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      8. div-sub 75.6%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      9. distribute-rgt1-in 76.4%

         \[\leadsto wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      10. associate-/l/ 76.4%

          \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. Simplified 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{{wj}^{2}} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 97.9%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot wj} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{{wj}^{3}} + \left(wj \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow3 97.9%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj\right)} + \left(wj \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 97.9%

       \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj\right)} + \left(wj \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right) \]

   if 0.00139999999999999999 < wj

   1. Initial program 20.0%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 20.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      2. div-sub 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      3. sub-neg 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      8. div-sub 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      9. distribute-rgt1-in 20.0%

         \[\leadsto wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      10. associate-/l/ 20.0%

          \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj}{1 + wj}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 0.0014:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(wj \cdot wj + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right) - wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 85.0% accurate, 44.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ x (* -2.0 (* wj x))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (-2.0 * (wj * x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + ((-2.0d0) * (wj * x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (-2.0 * (wj * x));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return x + (-2.0 * (wj * x))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(wj * x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (-2.0 * (wj * x));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(-2.0 * N[(wj * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.5%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

   2. div-sub 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

   3. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-neg-in 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

   6. remove-double-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

   8. div-sub 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   9. distribute-rgt1-in 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   10. associate-/l/ 75.3%

       \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

3. Simplified 76.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 83.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]

5. Final simplification 83.3%

   \[\leadsto x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) \]

Alternative 4: 4.2% accurate, 313.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 wj)

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return wj

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return wj
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := wj

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.5%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

   2. div-sub 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

   3. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-neg-in 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

   6. remove-double-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

   8. div-sub 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   9. distribute-rgt1-in 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   10. associate-/l/ 75.3%

       \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

3. Simplified 76.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in wj around inf 4.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj} \]

5. Final simplification 4.9%

   \[\leadsto wj \]

Alternative 5: 84.5% accurate, 313.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return x

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.5%

   \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

   2. div-sub 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

   3. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-neg-in 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

   6. remove-double-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

   8. div-sub 74.5%

      \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   9. distribute-rgt1-in 75.3%

      \[\leadsto wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

   10. associate-/l/ 75.3%

       \[\leadsto wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]

3. Simplified 76.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 82.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 82.2%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 78.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))

C

double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
}

Python

def code(wj, x):
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))

Julia

function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
end

Wolfram

code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023228 
(FPCore (wj x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))

  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))