Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 26.8s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-1 - \log \left(e^{-1 + \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   -1.0
   (log
    (exp
     (+
      -1.0
      (log
       (+
        -1.0
        (/
         1.0
         (+
          (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))
          (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (-1.0f - logf(expf((-1.0f + logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s))))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(-1.0) - log(exp(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (single(-1.0) - log(exp((single(-1.0) + log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))) + (u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s))))))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-1 - \log \left(e^{-1 + \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u96.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr96.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-udef96.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. log1p-udef96.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)}} - 1\right)\right) \]
    3. add-exp-log98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) - 1\right)}\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--l+98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  9. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-log-exp99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) - 1}\right)}\right)\right) \]
    2. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(1 + \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) + \left(-1\right)}}\right)\right)\right) \]
  11. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) + -1}\right)}\right)\right) \]
  12. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-1 - \log \left(e^{-1 + \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))) + (u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}} + -2\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log1p
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))))
     -2.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -log1pf(((1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -2.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))))) + Float32(-2.0)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}} + -2\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-expm1-u98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. expm1-udef98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} - 1}\right)\right) \]
    3. add-exp-log99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} - 1\right)\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) - 1\right)}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--l+99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1 - 1\right)}\right)\right) \]
    2. metadata-eval99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \color{blue}{-2}\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -2\right)}\right) \]
  8. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}} + -2\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 23.3% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\log \left(1 + -2 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)}{s}\right) \cdot \left(-2\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (*
   (log
    (+
     1.0
     (* -2.0 (/ (- (* 0.25 (* u PI)) (+ (* (* u PI) -0.25) (* PI 0.25))) s))))
   (- 2.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (logf((1.0f + (-2.0f * (((0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - (((u * ((float) M_PI)) * -0.25f) + (((float) M_PI) * 0.25f))) / s)))) * -2.0f);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(-2.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25)))) / s)))) * Float32(-Float32(2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (log((single(1.0) + (single(-2.0) * (((single(0.25) * (u * single(pi))) - (((u * single(pi)) * single(-0.25)) + (single(pi) * single(0.25)))) / s)))) * -single(2.0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\log \left(1 + -2 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)}{s}\right) \cdot \left(-2\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-sqr-sqrt98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1}\right)}\right) \]
    2. log-prod98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. count-298.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1}\right)}\right) \]
    2. +-commutative98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}}\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt{-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}\right)}\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 23.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
  9. Final simplification23.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(1 + -2 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)}{s}\right) \cdot \left(-2\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 11.6% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \cdot 4 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- (* 0.25 (* u PI)) (+ (* (* u PI) -0.25) (* PI 0.25))) 4.0))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - (((u * ((float) M_PI)) * -0.25f) + (((float) M_PI) * 0.25f))) * 4.0f;
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25)))) * Float32(4.0))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = ((single(0.25) * (u * single(pi))) - (((u * single(pi)) * single(-0.25)) + (single(pi) * single(0.25)))) * single(4.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \cdot 4
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification11.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \cdot 4 \]

Alternative 6: 11.6% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (* 2.0 (* u PI)) PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (2.0f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - ((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = (single(2.0) * (u * single(pi))) - single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u96.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. expm1-udef96.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr96.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)} - 1\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s} - -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \cdot u + -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def11.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s} - -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}, u, -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-out--11.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)}, u, -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right) + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval11.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}, u, -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right) + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot 0.5, u, \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25}\right) + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified11.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot 0.5, u, \frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25\right)} + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \]
  10. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -1 \cdot \pi} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg11.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\pi\right)} \]
    2. unsub-neg11.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi} \]
    3. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 2} - \pi \]
    4. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot 2 - \pi \]
  12. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 2 - \pi} \]
  13. Final simplification11.3%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi \]

Alternative 7: 11.4% accurate, 7.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-s}{\frac{s}{\pi}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (/ (- s) (/ s PI)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s / (s / ((float) M_PI));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) / Float32(s / Float32(pi)))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s / (s / single(pi));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{-s}{\frac{s}{\pi}}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1, 1\right), \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1, 1\right), \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-udef20.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1, 1\right), \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)\right)} - 1} \]
    3. +-commutative20.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1, 1\right), \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)}\right)} - 1 \]
  5. Applied egg-rr20.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1, 1\right), \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right)} - 1} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-def97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1, 1\right), \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-log1p99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1, 1\right), \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)} \]
    3. fma-udef99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -1 + 1}, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot u} + 1, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right) \]
    5. +-commutative99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + -1 \cdot u}, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right) \]
    6. mul-1-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-u\right)}, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right) \]
    7. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 - u}, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right) \]
  7. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}, \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/11.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-s\right) \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  10. Applied egg-rr11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-s\right) \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-/l*11.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-s}{\frac{s}{\pi}}} \]
  12. Simplified11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-s}{\frac{s}{\pi}}} \]
  13. Final simplification11.0%

    \[\leadsto \frac{-s}{\frac{s}{\pi}} \]

Alternative 8: 11.4% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification11.0%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Alternative 9: 10.3% accurate, 243.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s 0.0))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = s * 0.0e0
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(0.0))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot 0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-out99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. sub-neg99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u96.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. expm1-udef96.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr96.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{1} - 1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification10.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot 0 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023228 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))