Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, upper

Percentage Accurate: 95.9% → 98.3%
Time: 9.1s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 256\right) \land \left(0.25 \leq u \land u \leq 1\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* (* 3.0 s) (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (/ (- u 0.25) 0.75))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return (3.0f * s) * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - ((u - 0.25f) / 0.75f))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = (3.0e0 * s) * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - ((u - 0.25e0) / 0.75e0))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(3.0) * s) * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(u - Float32(0.25)) / Float32(0.75))))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = (single(3.0) * s) * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - ((u - single(0.25)) / single(0.75)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 95.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* (* 3.0 s) (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (/ (- u 0.25) 0.75))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return (3.0f * s) * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - ((u - 0.25f) / 0.75f))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = (3.0e0 * s) * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - ((u - 0.25e0) / 0.75e0))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(3.0) * s) * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(u - Float32(0.25)) / Float32(0.75))))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = (single(3.0) * s) * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - ((u - single(0.25)) / single(0.75)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\left(-u\right) - -0.25}{0.75}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* (* 3.0 s) (- (log1p (/ (- (- u) -0.25) 0.75)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return (3.0f * s) * -log1pf(((-u - -0.25f) / 0.75f));
}
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(3.0) * s) * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(Float32(-u) - Float32(-0.25)) / Float32(0.75)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\left(-u\right) - -0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.4%

    \[\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log-rec97.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)} \]
    2. sub-neg97.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. log1p-def98.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)}\right) \]
    4. distribute-neg-frac98.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-\left(u - 0.25\right)}{0.75}}\right)\right) \]
    5. sub-neg98.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{-\color{blue}{\left(u + \left(-0.25\right)\right)}}{0.75}\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval98.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{-\left(u + \color{blue}{-0.25}\right)}{0.75}\right)\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{-\left(u + -0.25\right)}{0.75}\right)\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification98.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\left(-u\right) - -0.25}{0.75}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 96.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(u \cdot -1.3333333333333333 + 1.3333333333333333\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* -3.0 (* s (log (+ (* u -1.3333333333333333) 1.3333333333333333)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return -3.0f * (s * logf(((u * -1.3333333333333333f) + 1.3333333333333333f)));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = (-3.0e0) * (s * log(((u * (-1.3333333333333333e0)) + 1.3333333333333333e0)))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(-3.0) * Float32(s * log(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-1.3333333333333333)) + Float32(1.3333333333333333)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = single(-3.0) * (s * log(((u * single(-1.3333333333333333)) + single(1.3333333333333333))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(u \cdot -1.3333333333333333 + 1.3333333333333333\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.4%

    \[\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l*96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)\right)} \]
    2. log-rec97.0%

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg97.0%

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{\color{blue}{u + \left(-0.25\right)}}{0.75}\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval97.0%

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u + \color{blue}{-0.25}}{0.75}\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Simplified97.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u + -0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around 0 96.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 - 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(u - 0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 96.6%

    \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333\right)}\right) \]
  6. Final simplification96.6%

    \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(u \cdot -1.3333333333333333 + 1.3333333333333333\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(u + -0.25\right) \cdot -1.3333333333333333\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u)
 :precision binary32
 (* -3.0 (* s (log1p (* (+ u -0.25) -1.3333333333333333)))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return -3.0f * (s * log1pf(((u + -0.25f) * -1.3333333333333333f)));
}
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(-3.0) * Float32(s * log1p(Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-0.25)) * Float32(-1.3333333333333333)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(u + -0.25\right) \cdot -1.3333333333333333\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.4%

    \[\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l*96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)\right)} \]
    2. log-rec97.0%

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg97.0%

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{\color{blue}{u + \left(-0.25\right)}}{0.75}\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval97.0%

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u + \color{blue}{-0.25}}{0.75}\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Simplified97.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u + -0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around 0 96.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 - 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(u - 0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. cancel-sign-sub-inv96.9%

      \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-1.3333333333333333\right) \cdot \left(u - 0.25\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. log1p-def98.0%

      \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-1.3333333333333333\right) \cdot \left(u - 0.25\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval98.0%

      \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-1.3333333333333333} \cdot \left(u - 0.25\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. sub-neg98.0%

      \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u + \left(-0.25\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval98.0%

      \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(u + \color{blue}{-0.25}\right)\right)\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr98.0%

    \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(u + -0.25\right)\right)}\right) \]
  7. Final simplification98.0%

    \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(u + -0.25\right) \cdot -1.3333333333333333\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.25 - u}{0.75}\right) \cdot -3\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (* (log1p (/ (- 0.25 u) 0.75)) -3.0)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (log1pf(((0.25f - u) / 0.75f)) * -3.0f);
}
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(log1p(Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) - u) / Float32(0.75))) * Float32(-3.0)))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.25 - u}{0.75}\right) \cdot -3\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.4%

    \[\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l*96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)\right) \cdot 3} \]
    3. associate-*l*96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \cdot 3\right)} \]
    4. log-rec96.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)} \cdot 3\right) \]
    5. distribute-lft-neg-out96.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right) \cdot 3\right)} \]
    6. distribute-rgt-neg-in96.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right)} \]
    7. sub-neg96.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    8. log1p-def98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)} \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    9. distribute-neg-frac98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-\left(u - 0.25\right)}{0.75}}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    10. sub-neg98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{-\color{blue}{\left(u + \left(-0.25\right)\right)}}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    11. +-commutative98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25\right) + u\right)}}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    12. distribute-neg-in98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(-\left(-0.25\right)\right) + \left(-u\right)}}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    13. metadata-eval98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{-0.25}\right) + \left(-u\right)}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    14. metadata-eval98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{0.25} + \left(-u\right)}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    15. unsub-neg98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{0.25 - u}}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    16. metadata-eval98.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.25 - u}{0.75}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-3}\right) \]
  3. Simplified98.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.25 - u}{0.75}\right) \cdot -3\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification98.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{0.25 - u}{0.75}\right) \cdot -3\right) \]

Alternative 5: 28.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log 0.75\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* -3.0 (* s (log 0.75))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return -3.0f * (s * logf(0.75f));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = (-3.0e0) * (s * log(0.75e0))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(-3.0) * Float32(s * log(Float32(0.75))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = single(-3.0) * (s * log(single(0.75)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log 0.75\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.4%

    \[\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 7.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log 0.75} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u7.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log 0.75\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-udef9.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1} \]
    3. add-sqr-sqrt9.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{3 \cdot s} \cdot \sqrt{3 \cdot s}\right)} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
    4. sqrt-unprod9.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(3 \cdot s\right)}} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
    5. swap-sqr9.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot 3\right) \cdot \left(s \cdot s\right)}} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
    6. metadata-eval9.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{9} \cdot \left(s \cdot s\right)} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
    7. metadata-eval9.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-3 \cdot -3\right)} \cdot \left(s \cdot s\right)} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
    8. swap-sqr9.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(-3 \cdot s\right)}} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
    9. sqrt-unprod-0.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-3 \cdot s} \cdot \sqrt{-3 \cdot s}\right)} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
    10. add-sqr-sqrt15.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-3 \cdot s\right)} \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1 \]
  4. Applied egg-rr15.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log 0.75\right)} - 1} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-def28.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log 0.75\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-log1p28.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log 0.75} \]
    3. associate-*l*28.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log 0.75\right)} \]
  6. Simplified28.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log 0.75\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification28.4%

    \[\leadsto -3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log 0.75\right) \]

Alternative 6: 7.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log 0.421875 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (log 0.421875)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * logf(0.421875f);
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * log(0.421875e0)
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(0.421875)))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * log(single(0.421875));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log 0.421875
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.4%

    \[\left(3 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l*96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right)\right) \cdot 3} \]
    3. associate-*l*96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}}\right) \cdot 3\right)} \]
    4. log-rec96.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)} \cdot 3\right) \]
    5. distribute-lft-neg-out96.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right) \cdot 3\right)} \]
    6. distribute-rgt-neg-in96.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - \frac{u - 0.25}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right)} \]
    7. div-sub95.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{u}{0.75} - \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    8. associate--r-96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - \frac{u}{0.75}\right) + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)} \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    9. sub-neg96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\frac{u}{0.75}\right)\right)} + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    10. +-commutative96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{u}{0.75}\right) + 1\right)} + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    11. associate-+l+94.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{u}{0.75}\right) + \left(1 + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    12. distribute-neg-frac94.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-u}{0.75}} + \left(1 + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    13. neg-mul-194.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot u}}{0.75} + \left(1 + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    14. associate-/l*94.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{0.75}{u}}} + \left(1 + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    15. associate-/r/96.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{0.75} \cdot u} + \left(1 + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    16. metadata-eval96.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{-1.3333333333333333} \cdot u + \left(1 + \frac{0.25}{0.75}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    17. metadata-eval96.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot u + \left(1 + \color{blue}{0.3333333333333333}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    18. metadata-eval96.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot u + \color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}\right) \cdot \left(-3\right)\right) \]
    19. metadata-eval96.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333\right) \cdot \color{blue}{-3}\right) \]
  3. Simplified96.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\log \left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333\right) \cdot -3\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-log-exp96.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\log \left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333\right) \cdot -3}\right)} \]
    2. exp-to-pow96.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left({\left(-1.3333333333333333 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333\right)}^{-3}\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative96.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left({\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -1.3333333333333333} + 1.3333333333333333\right)}^{-3}\right) \]
    4. fma-def97.2%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1.3333333333333333, 1.3333333333333333\right)\right)}}^{-3}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr97.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -1.3333333333333333, 1.3333333333333333\right)\right)}^{-3}\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 7.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \color{blue}{0.421875} \]
  7. Final simplification7.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \log 0.421875 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023224 
(FPCore (s u)
  :name "Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, upper"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 256.0)) (and (<= 0.25 u) (<= u 1.0)))
  (* (* 3.0 s) (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (/ (- u 0.25) 0.75))))))