math.sqrt on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 40.9% → 87.8%

Time: 6.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 2.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 40.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im))) + re))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im))) + re)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 87.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} im = |im|\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-23}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -1.05e-23)
   (* 0.5 (/ im (sqrt (- re))))
   (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re (hypot re im)))))))

C

im = abs(im);
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -1.05e-23) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / sqrt(-re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

im = Math.abs(im);
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -1.05e-23) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / Math.sqrt(-re));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + Math.hypot(re, im))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

im = abs(im)
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -1.05e-23:
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / math.sqrt(-re))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + math.hypot(re, im))))
	return tmp

Julia

im = abs(im)
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -1.05e-23)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(im / sqrt(Float64(-re))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + hypot(re, im)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

im = abs(im)
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -1.05e-23)
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / sqrt(-re));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + hypot(re, im))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -1.05e-23], N[(0.5 * N[(im / N[Sqrt[(-re)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + N[Sqrt[re ^ 2 + im ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -1.05e-23

   1. Initial program 14.4%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 14.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 34.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 34.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 55.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot {im}^{2}}{re}}} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{-{im}^{2}}}{re}} \]

      3. unpow2 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{-\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot \left(-im\right)}}{re}} \]

   6. Simplified 55.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{im \cdot \left(-im\right)}{re}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{-im \cdot \left(-im\right)}{-re}}} \]

      2. sqrt-div 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{-im \cdot \left(-im\right)}}{\sqrt{-re}}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{-\color{blue}{\left(-im \cdot im\right)}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 40.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 44.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{im}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 44.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}} \]

   if -1.05e-23 < re

   1. Initial program 52.1%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 52.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 95.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-23}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 76.3% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} im = |im|\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -4.8e-26)
   (* 0.5 (/ im (sqrt (- re))))
   (if (<= re 5e+33)
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ re im))))
     (* 0.5 (* 2.0 (sqrt re))))))

C

im = abs(im);
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -4.8e-26) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / sqrt(-re));
	} else if (re <= 5e+33) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-4.8d-26)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (im / sqrt(-re))
    else if (re <= 5d+33) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (re + im)))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (2.0d0 * sqrt(re))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

im = Math.abs(im);
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -4.8e-26) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / Math.sqrt(-re));
	} else if (re <= 5e+33) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * Math.sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

im = abs(im)
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -4.8e-26:
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / math.sqrt(-re))
	elif re <= 5e+33:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * math.sqrt(re))
	return tmp

Julia

im = abs(im)
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -4.8e-26)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(im / sqrt(Float64(-re))));
	elseif (re <= 5e+33)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(re + im))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(2.0 * sqrt(re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

im = abs(im)
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -4.8e-26)
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / sqrt(-re));
	elseif (re <= 5e+33)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (re + im)));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -4.8e-26], N[(0.5 * N[(im / N[Sqrt[(-re)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 5e+33], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -4.8000000000000002e-26

   1. Initial program 14.4%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 14.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 34.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 34.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 55.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot {im}^{2}}{re}}} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{-{im}^{2}}}{re}} \]

      3. unpow2 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{-\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot \left(-im\right)}}{re}} \]

   6. Simplified 55.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{im \cdot \left(-im\right)}{re}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{-im \cdot \left(-im\right)}{-re}}} \]

      2. sqrt-div 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{-im \cdot \left(-im\right)}}{\sqrt{-re}}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{-\color{blue}{\left(-im \cdot im\right)}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 40.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 44.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{im}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 44.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}} \]

   if -4.8000000000000002e-26 < re < 4.99999999999999973e33

   1. Initial program 56.3%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 56.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 93.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 38.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im + 2 \cdot re}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 38.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(im + re\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 38.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right)}} \]

      3. *-commutative 38.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot 2}} \]

      4. +-commutative 38.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(im + re\right)} \cdot 2} \]

   6. Simplified 38.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(im + re\right) \cdot 2}} \]

   if 4.99999999999999973e33 < re

   1. Initial program 41.5%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 41.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 81.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 81.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

      2. rem-square-sqrt 83.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 83.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + im\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 75.7% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} im = |im|\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 60:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -2.1e-24)
   (* 0.5 (/ im (sqrt (- re))))
   (if (<= re 60.0) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* im 2.0))) (* 0.5 (* 2.0 (sqrt re))))))

C

im = abs(im);
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -2.1e-24) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / sqrt(-re));
	} else if (re <= 60.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-2.1d-24)) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (im / sqrt(-re))
    else if (re <= 60.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((im * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (2.0d0 * sqrt(re))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

im = Math.abs(im);
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -2.1e-24) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / Math.sqrt(-re));
	} else if (re <= 60.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((im * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * Math.sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

im = abs(im)
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -2.1e-24:
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / math.sqrt(-re))
	elif re <= 60.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((im * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * math.sqrt(re))
	return tmp

Julia

im = abs(im)
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -2.1e-24)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(im / sqrt(Float64(-re))));
	elseif (re <= 60.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(im * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(2.0 * sqrt(re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

im = abs(im)
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -2.1e-24)
		tmp = 0.5 * (im / sqrt(-re));
	elseif (re <= 60.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -2.1e-24], N[(0.5 * N[(im / N[Sqrt[(-re)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 60.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(im * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -2.0999999999999999e-24

   1. Initial program 14.4%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 14.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 34.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 34.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around -inf 55.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{{im}^{2}}{re}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot {im}^{2}}{re}}} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{-{im}^{2}}}{re}} \]

      3. unpow2 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{-\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}{re}} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{im \cdot \left(-im\right)}}{re}} \]

   6. Simplified 55.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{im \cdot \left(-im\right)}{re}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 55.3%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{-im \cdot \left(-im\right)}{-re}}} \]

      2. sqrt-div 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{-im \cdot \left(-im\right)}}{\sqrt{-re}}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{-\color{blue}{\left(-im \cdot im\right)}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 60.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 40.5%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 44.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{im}}{\sqrt{-re}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 44.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}} \]

   if -2.0999999999999999e-24 < re < 60

   1. Initial program 55.7%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.7%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 93.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 37.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 37.2%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

   6. Simplified 37.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

   if 60 < re

   1. Initial program 43.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 43.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 79.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

      2. rem-square-sqrt 81.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \frac{im}{\sqrt{-re}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 60:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 63.3% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} im = |im|\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 34:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 34.0) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* im 2.0))) (* 0.5 (* 2.0 (sqrt re)))))

C

im = abs(im);
double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 34.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 34.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((im * 2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (2.0d0 * sqrt(re))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

im = Math.abs(im);
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 34.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((im * 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * Math.sqrt(re));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

im = abs(im)
def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 34.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((im * 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * math.sqrt(re))
	return tmp

Julia

im = abs(im)
function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 34.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(im * 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(2.0 * sqrt(re)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

im = abs(im)
function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 34.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * (2.0 * sqrt(re));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 34.0], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(im * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[re], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 34

   1. Initial program 41.8%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 41.8%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 73.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 29.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 29.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

   6. Simplified 29.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

   if 34 < re

   1. Initial program 43.9%

      \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 43.9%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

      2. hypot-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 79.6%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

      2. rem-square-sqrt 81.1%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{re}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 34:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(2 \cdot \sqrt{re}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 52.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} im = |im|\\ \\ 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 (sqrt (* im 2.0))))

C

im = abs(im);
double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
}

Fortran

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 0.5d0 * sqrt((im * 2.0d0))
end function

Java

im = Math.abs(im);
public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 0.5 * Math.sqrt((im * 2.0));
}

Python

im = abs(im)
def code(re, im):
	return 0.5 * math.sqrt((im * 2.0))

Julia

im = abs(im)
function code(re, im)
	return Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(im * 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

im = abs(im)
function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((im * 2.0));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: im should be positive before calling this function
code[re_, im_] := N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(im * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 42.2%

   \[0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im} + re\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 42.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\right)}} \]

   2. hypot-def 79.2%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 79.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(re + \mathsf{hypot}\left(re, im\right)\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{2 \cdot im}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 25.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

6. Simplified 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot 2}} \]

7. Final simplification 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \sqrt{im \cdot 2} \]

Developer target: 48.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sqrt{re \cdot re + im \cdot im}\\ \mathbf{if}\;re < 0:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{im \cdot im}{t_0 - re}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \left(t_0 + re\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im)))))
   (if (< re 0.0)
     (* 0.5 (* (sqrt 2.0) (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- t_0 re)))))
     (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ t_0 re)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	double tmp;
	if (re < 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))
    if (re < 0.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (sqrt(2.0d0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))))
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * sqrt((2.0d0 * (t_0 + re)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = Math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	double tmp;
	if (re < 0.0) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (Math.sqrt(2.0) * Math.sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * Math.sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	t_0 = math.sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)))
	tmp = 0
	if re < 0.0:
		tmp = 0.5 * (math.sqrt(2.0) * math.sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * math.sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(Float64(Float64(re * re) + Float64(im * im)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re < 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(Float64(Float64(im * im) / Float64(t_0 - re)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * sqrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_0 + re))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	t_0 = sqrt(((re * re) + (im * im)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re < 0.0)
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(2.0) * sqrt(((im * im) / (t_0 - re))));
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * sqrt((2.0 * (t_0 + re)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sqrt[N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] + N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[re, 0.0], N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 - re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * N[Sqrt[N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$0 + re), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023224 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.sqrt on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< re 0.0) (* 0.5 (* (sqrt 2.0) (sqrt (/ (* im im) (- (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re))))) (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))

  (* 0.5 (sqrt (* 2.0 (+ (sqrt (+ (* re re) (* im im))) re)))))