Octave 3.8, jcobi/1

Percentage Accurate: 74.9% → 99.9%

Time: 21.2s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

\[\alpha > -1 \land \beta > -1\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ alpha beta) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    code = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 74.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ alpha beta) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    code = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \leq -0.999995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{\left({\left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)} + 1\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ beta alpha) 2.0)) -0.999995)
   (/
    (+
     (* (/ (- -2.0 (+ beta beta)) alpha) (/ (+ beta 2.0) alpha))
     (/ (+ beta (+ beta 2.0)) alpha))
    2.0)
   (/
    (pow
     (pow (+ (/ (- beta alpha) (+ beta (+ alpha 2.0))) 1.0) 3.0)
     0.3333333333333333)
    2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (((beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)) <= -0.999995) {
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(pow((((beta - alpha) / (beta + (alpha + 2.0))) + 1.0), 3.0), 0.3333333333333333) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0d0)) <= (-0.999995d0)) then
        tmp = (((((-2.0d0) - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0d0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0d0)) / alpha)) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (((((beta - alpha) / (beta + (alpha + 2.0d0))) + 1.0d0) ** 3.0d0) ** 0.3333333333333333d0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (((beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)) <= -0.999995) {
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(Math.pow((((beta - alpha) / (beta + (alpha + 2.0))) + 1.0), 3.0), 0.3333333333333333) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if ((beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)) <= -0.999995:
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(math.pow((((beta - alpha) / (beta + (alpha + 2.0))) + 1.0), 3.0), 0.3333333333333333) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(beta + alpha) + 2.0)) <= -0.999995)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-2.0 - Float64(beta + beta)) / alpha) * Float64(Float64(beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(((Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(beta + Float64(alpha + 2.0))) + 1.0) ^ 3.0) ^ 0.3333333333333333) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)) <= -0.999995)
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (((((beta - alpha) / (beta + (alpha + 2.0))) + 1.0) ^ 3.0) ^ 0.3333333333333333) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -0.999995], N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(-2.0 - N[(beta + beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(beta + N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[N[Power[N[(N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(beta + N[(alpha + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision], 0.3333333333333333], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2)) < -0.99999499999999997

   1. Initial program 6.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 6.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha} + -1 \cdot \frac{{\left(\beta + 2\right)}^{2} + \beta \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}{{\alpha}^{2}}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta}{\alpha}, \frac{2 + \beta}{\alpha}, \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}\right)}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{2 + \beta}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. associate--l- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{2 + \beta}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\beta + 2}}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if -0.99999499999999997 < (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2))

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1\right)}}}{2} \]

      2. pow1/3 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\left(\left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1\right)\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}}}{2} \]

      3. pow3 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\color{blue}{\left({\left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1\right)}^{3}\right)}}^{0.3333333333333333}}{2} \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left({\left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)}} + 1\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}}{2} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left({\left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)} + 1\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \leq -0.999995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{\left({\left(\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)} + 1\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -0.999995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ beta alpha) 2.0))))
   (if (<= t_0 -0.999995)
     (/
      (+
       (* (/ (- -2.0 (+ beta beta)) alpha) (/ (+ beta 2.0) alpha))
       (/ (+ beta (+ beta 2.0)) alpha))
      2.0)
     (/ (+ t_0 1.0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995) {
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0d0)
    if (t_0 <= (-0.999995d0)) then
        tmp = (((((-2.0d0) - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0d0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0d0)) / alpha)) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (t_0 + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995) {
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -0.999995:
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(beta + alpha) + 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-2.0 - Float64(beta + beta)) / alpha) * Float64(Float64(beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995)
		tmp = ((((-2.0 - (beta + beta)) / alpha) * ((beta + 2.0) / alpha)) + ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -0.999995], N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(-2.0 - N[(beta + beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(beta + N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2)) < -0.99999499999999997

   1. Initial program 6.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 6.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha} + -1 \cdot \frac{{\left(\beta + 2\right)}^{2} + \beta \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}{{\alpha}^{2}}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta}{\alpha}, \frac{2 + \beta}{\alpha}, \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}\right)}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{2 + \beta}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. associate--l- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{2 + \beta}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\beta + 2}}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if -0.99999499999999997 < (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2))

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \leq -0.999995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{-2 - \left(\beta + \beta\right)}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\beta + 2}{\alpha} + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -0.999995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ beta alpha) 2.0))))
   (if (<= t_0 -0.999995)
     (/ (/ (+ beta (+ beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)
     (/ (+ t_0 1.0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995) {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0d0)
    if (t_0 <= (-0.999995d0)) then
        tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (t_0 + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995) {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -0.999995:
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(beta + alpha) + 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -0.999995)
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -0.999995], N[(N[(N[(beta + N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2)) < -0.99999499999999997

   1. Initial program 6.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 6.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 99.3%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.3%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if -0.99999499999999997 < (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2))

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \leq -0.999995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 94.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 225000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \left(\beta - \alpha\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 225000.0)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (* (- beta alpha) (/ 1.0 (+ beta 2.0)))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ beta (+ beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 225000.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + ((beta - alpha) * (1.0 / (beta + 2.0)))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 225000.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + ((beta - alpha) * (1.0d0 / (beta + 2.0d0)))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 225000.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + ((beta - alpha) * (1.0 / (beta + 2.0)))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 225000.0:
		tmp = (1.0 + ((beta - alpha) * (1.0 / (beta + 2.0)))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 225000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(beta + 2.0)))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 225000.0)
		tmp = (1.0 + ((beta - alpha) * (1.0 / (beta + 2.0)))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 225000.0], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(beta + N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 225000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2}{\beta - \alpha}}} + 1}{2} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)} + 1}{2} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)}} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right) + 1}{2} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)} + 1}{2} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\beta + 2}} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right) + 1}{2} \]

   if 225000 < alpha

   1. Initial program 21.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 21.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 21.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 225000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \left(\beta - \alpha\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 88.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 125000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 125000.0)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ 2.0 alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 125000.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 125000.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 125000.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 125000.0:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 125000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 125000.0)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 125000.0], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 125000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 125000 < alpha

   1. Initial program 21.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 21.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 21.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 125000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 93.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 290000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 290000.0)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ beta (+ beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 290000.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 290000.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 290000.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 290000.0:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 290000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 290000.0)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 290000.0], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(beta + N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 2.9e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 2.9e5 < alpha

   1. Initial program 21.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 21.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 21.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 290000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 71.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 0.82:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 - \alpha \cdot 0.5}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= beta 0.82) (/ (- 1.0 (* alpha 0.5)) 2.0) 1.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 0.82) {
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 0.82d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - (alpha * 0.5d0)) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 0.82) {
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 0.82:
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 0.82)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - Float64(alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 0.82)
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 0.82], N[(N[(1.0 - N[(alpha * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], 1.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 0.819999999999999951

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2}{\beta - \alpha}}} + 1}{2} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)} + 1}{2} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)}} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right) + 1}{2} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\beta + \left(\alpha + 2\right)} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)} + 1}{2} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\beta + 2}} \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right) + 1}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - 0.5 \cdot \alpha}}{2} \]

   if 0.819999999999999951 < beta

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 0.82:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 - \alpha \cdot 0.5}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 52.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 120000:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 120000.0) 1.0 (/ (/ 2.0 alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 120000.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 120000.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 120000.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 120000.0:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 120000.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 120000.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 120000.0], 1.0, N[(N[(2.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 1.2e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]

   if 1.2e5 < alpha

   1. Initial program 21.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 21.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 21.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 120000:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 39.7% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 2e+183) 1.0 (/ beta alpha)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 2e+183) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = beta / alpha;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 2d+183) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = beta / alpha
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 2e+183) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = beta / alpha;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 2e+183:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = beta / alpha
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 2e+183)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(beta / alpha);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 2e+183)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = beta / alpha;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 2e+183], 1.0, N[(beta / alpha), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 1.99999999999999989e183

   1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 85.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 40.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]

   if 1.99999999999999989e183 < alpha

   1. Initial program 13.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 13.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 13.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(\beta + 2\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 94.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + 2\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      11. +-commutative 94.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 24.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \beta}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 24.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\alpha}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+183}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 36.9% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 77.2%

   \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 77.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

3. Simplified 77.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]

5. Final simplification 37.1%

   \[\leadsto 1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023224 
(FPCore (alpha beta)
  :name "Octave 3.8, jcobi/1"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (> alpha -1.0) (> beta -1.0))
  (/ (+ (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ alpha beta) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))