Examples.Basics.BasicTests:f2 from sbv-4.4

Percentage Accurate: 94.5% → 97.2%

Time: 2.2s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 0.6×

• 43.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) - (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * x) - (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) - (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * x) - (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * x) - (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 94.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) - (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * x) - (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) - (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * x) - (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * x) - (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \left(-y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (fma x x (* y (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return fma(x, x, (y * -y));
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return fma(x, x, Float64(y * Float64(-y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * x + N[(y * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.8%

   \[x \cdot x - y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-neg 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -y \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-y\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \left(-y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 75.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-54} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+183}\right) \land x \cdot x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+261}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x x) 8.4e-54)
         (and (not (<= (* x x) 6.8e+183)) (<= (* x x) 5.6e+261)))
   (* y (- y))
   (* x x)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * x) <= 8.4e-54) || (!((x * x) <= 6.8e+183) && ((x * x) <= 5.6e+261))) {
		tmp = y * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * x) <= 8.4d-54) .or. (.not. ((x * x) <= 6.8d+183)) .and. ((x * x) <= 5.6d+261)) then
        tmp = y * -y
    else
        tmp = x * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * x) <= 8.4e-54) || (!((x * x) <= 6.8e+183) && ((x * x) <= 5.6e+261))) {
		tmp = y * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * x) <= 8.4e-54) or (not ((x * x) <= 6.8e+183) and ((x * x) <= 5.6e+261)):
		tmp = y * -y
	else:
		tmp = x * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * x) <= 8.4e-54) || (!(Float64(x * x) <= 6.8e+183) && (Float64(x * x) <= 5.6e+261)))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * x) <= 8.4e-54) || (~(((x * x) <= 6.8e+183)) && ((x * x) <= 5.6e+261)))
		tmp = y * -y;
	else
		tmp = x * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 8.4e-54], And[N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 6.8e+183]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 5.6e+261]]], N[(y * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x x) < 8.4e-54 or 6.8e183 < (*.f64 x x) < 5.5999999999999996e261

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot x - y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 84.0%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 84.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot y} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 84.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   if 8.4e-54 < (*.f64 x x) < 6.8e183 or 5.5999999999999996e261 < (*.f64 x x)

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[x \cdot x - y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-54} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+183}\right) \land x \cdot x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+261}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 97.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - y \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y y) 2e+299) (- (* x x) (* y y)) (* y (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * y) <= 2e+299) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y * y) <= 2d+299) then
        tmp = (x * x) - (y * y)
    else
        tmp = y * -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * y) <= 2e+299) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (y * y) <= 2e+299:
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * y)
	else:
		tmp = y * -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * y) <= 2e+299)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(y * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * y) <= 2e+299)
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * y);
	else
		tmp = y * -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+299], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y y) < 2.0000000000000001e299

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot x - y \cdot y \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e299 < (*.f64 y y)

   1. Initial program 76.1%

      \[x \cdot x - y \cdot y \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 94.0%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot y} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - y \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 53.2% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.8%

   \[x \cdot x - y \cdot y \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 50.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

4. Simplified 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

5. Final simplification 50.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023224 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Examples.Basics.BasicTests:f2 from sbv-4.4"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* x x) (* y y)))