Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (fma
  x
  -0.70711
  (/ (fma x 0.1913510371 1.6316775383) (fma x (fma x 0.04481 0.99229) 1.0))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return fma(x, -0.70711, (fma(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383) / fma(x, fma(x, 0.04481, 0.99229), 1.0)));
}

Julia

function code(x)
	return fma(x, -0.70711, Float64(fma(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383) / fma(x, fma(x, 0.04481, 0.99229), 1.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(x * -0.70711 + N[(N[(x * 0.1913510371 + 1.6316775383), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x * N[(x * 0.04481 + 0.99229), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\right)} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot 0.70711 + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711} \]

   4. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot 0.70711\right)} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]

   5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-0.70711\right)} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]

   6. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{-0.70711} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]

   7. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.70711 \cdot -1\right)} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]

   8. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.70711 \cdot -1, \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711\right)} \]

   9. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{-0.70711}, \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711\right) \]

   10. associate-*l/ 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061\right) \cdot 0.70711}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)}}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right) + x \cdot 0.99229\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (-
   (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (+ (* x (* x 0.04481)) (* x 0.99229))))
   x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((x * (x * 0.04481)) + (x * 0.99229)))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + ((x * (x * 0.04481d0)) + (x * 0.99229d0)))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((x * (x * 0.04481)) + (x * 0.99229)))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((x * (x * 0.04481)) + (x * 0.99229)))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(x * Float64(x * 0.04481)) + Float64(x * 0.99229)))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + ((x * (x * 0.04481)) + (x * 0.99229)))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(N[(x * N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.99229), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229\right)}} - x\right) \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right) + x \cdot 0.99229\right)}} - x\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right) + x \cdot 0.99229\right)}} - x\right) \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \left(x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right) + x \cdot 0.99229\right)} - x\right) \]

Alternative 3: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

Alternative 4: 98.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot 0.99229} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x 0.99229))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * 0.99229d0))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * 0.99229))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * 0.99229), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{0.99229 \cdot x}} - x\right) \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]

4. Simplified 97.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]

5. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot 0.99229} - x\right) \]

Alternative 5: 98.3% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.05) (* x -0.70711) (if (<= x 1.2) 1.6316775383 (* x -0.70711))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.2) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.05d0)) then
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    else if (x <= 1.2d0) then
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0
    else
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.2) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.05:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	elif x <= 1.2:
		tmp = 1.6316775383
	else:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	elseif (x <= 1.2)
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	elseif (x <= 1.2)
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	else
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.05], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.2], 1.6316775383, N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.05000000000000004 or 1.19999999999999996 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   5. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   if -1.05000000000000004 < x < 1.19999999999999996

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 97.8% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(2.30753 - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (* 0.70711 (- 2.30753 x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (2.30753d0 - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(2.30753 - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (2.30753 - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(2.30753 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]

3. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(2.30753 - x\right) \]

Alternative 7: 9.7% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.1928378166664987 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 0.1928378166664987)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.1928378166664987;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.1928378166664987d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.1928378166664987;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.1928378166664987

Julia

function code(x)
	return 0.1928378166664987
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.1928378166664987;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 0.1928378166664987

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{0.99229 \cdot x}} - x\right) \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.8%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]

4. Simplified 97.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1928378166664987 + -0.70711 \cdot x} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 55.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x + 0.1928378166664987} \]

   2. *-commutative 55.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} + 0.1928378166664987 \]

7. Simplified 55.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711 + 0.1928378166664987} \]

8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 10.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1928378166664987} \]

9. Final simplification 10.1%

   \[\leadsto 0.1928378166664987 \]

Alternative 8: 50.4% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1.6316775383 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 1.6316775383)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.6316775383d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.6316775383

Julia

function code(x)
	return 1.6316775383
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.6316775383;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 1.6316775383

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2.30753} - x\right) \]

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]

4. Final simplification 52.3%

   \[\leadsto 1.6316775383 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023224 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))