Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, E

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 4.6s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (- 1.0 x) (* y (sqrt x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (1.0d0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * Math.sqrt(x));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * math.sqrt(x))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) + Float64(y * sqrt(x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (1.0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Sqrt[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (- 1.0 x) (* y (sqrt x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (1.0d0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * Math.sqrt(x));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * math.sqrt(x))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) + Float64(y * sqrt(x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (1.0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Sqrt[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (- 1.0 x) (* y (sqrt x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (1.0d0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * Math.sqrt(x));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (1.0 - x) + (y * math.sqrt(x))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) + Float64(y * sqrt(x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (1.0 - x) + (y * sqrt(x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Sqrt[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

Alternative 2: 95.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;1 + y \cdot \sqrt{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 - x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -5e+65) (not (<= y 4.6e+45))) (+ 1.0 (* y (sqrt x))) (- 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5e+65) || !(y <= 4.6e+45)) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (y * sqrt(x));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 - x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-5d+65)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.6d+45))) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (y * sqrt(x))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 - x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5e+65) || !(y <= 4.6e+45)) {
		tmp = 1.0 + (y * Math.sqrt(x));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 - x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -5e+65) or not (y <= 4.6e+45):
		tmp = 1.0 + (y * math.sqrt(x))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 - x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -5e+65) || !(y <= 4.6e+45))
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(y * sqrt(x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 - x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -5e+65) || ~((y <= 4.6e+45)))
		tmp = 1.0 + (y * sqrt(x));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 - x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -5e+65], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.6e+45]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(1.0 + N[(y * N[Sqrt[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.99999999999999973e65 or 4.60000000000000025e45 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \sqrt{x} + \left(1 - x\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{x} \cdot y} + \left(1 - x\right) \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{x}}\right)} \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\sqrt{x}} \cdot \left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x}} \cdot y\right)} + \left(1 - x\right) \]

      5. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} \cdot y, 1 - x\right)} \]

      6. pow1/2 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{x}^{0.5}}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} \cdot y, 1 - x\right) \]

      7. sqrt-pow1 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{{x}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} \cdot y, 1 - x\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}, \sqrt{\sqrt{x}} \cdot y, 1 - x\right) \]

      9. pow1/2 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{0.25}, \sqrt{\color{blue}{{x}^{0.5}}} \cdot y, 1 - x\right) \]

      10. sqrt-pow1 99.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{0.25}, \color{blue}{{x}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}} \cdot y, 1 - x\right) \]

      11. metadata-eval 99.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{0.25}, {x}^{\color{blue}{0.25}} \cdot y, 1 - x\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{0.25}, {x}^{0.25} \cdot y, 1 - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \sqrt{x} + 1} \]

   if -4.99999999999999973e65 < y < 4.60000000000000025e45

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;1 + y \cdot \sqrt{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 - x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 92.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+80} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+109}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \sqrt{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 - x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.5e+80) (not (<= y 7.2e+109))) (* y (sqrt x)) (- 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.5e+80) || !(y <= 7.2e+109)) {
		tmp = y * sqrt(x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 - x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3.5d+80)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7.2d+109))) then
        tmp = y * sqrt(x)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 - x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.5e+80) || !(y <= 7.2e+109)) {
		tmp = y * Math.sqrt(x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 - x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3.5e+80) or not (y <= 7.2e+109):
		tmp = y * math.sqrt(x)
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 - x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.5e+80) || !(y <= 7.2e+109))
		tmp = Float64(y * sqrt(x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 - x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3.5e+80) || ~((y <= 7.2e+109)))
		tmp = y * sqrt(x);
	else
		tmp = 1.0 - x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.5e+80], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7.2e+109]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[Sqrt[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.49999999999999994e80 or 7.2e109 < y

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \sqrt{x}} \]

   if -3.49999999999999994e80 < y < 7.2e109

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+80} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+109}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \sqrt{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 - x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 61.5% accurate, 26.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x 1.75e-5) 1.0 (- x)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 1.75e-5) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = -x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 1.75d-5) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = -x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 1.75e-5) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = -x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 1.75e-5:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = -x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 1.75e-5)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 1.75e-5)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = -x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, 1.75e-5], 1.0, (-x)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 1.7499999999999998e-5

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

   if 1.7499999999999998e-5 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 62.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]

   4. Simplified 62.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 62.8% accurate, 35.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return 1.0 - x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = 1.0d0 - x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return 1.0 - x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return 1.0 - x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(1.0 - x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = 1.0 - x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - x} \]

3. Final simplification 65.2%

   \[\leadsto 1 - x \]

Alternative 6: 32.4% accurate, 107.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(1 - x\right) + y \cdot \sqrt{x} \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 33.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

3. Final simplification 33.4%

   \[\leadsto 1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023224 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, E"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- 1.0 x) (* y (sqrt x))))