Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 100.0%

Time: 4.3s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.3×

• 20.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (- y z) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (y - z), z);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(y - z), z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

   5. +-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

   6. *-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   7. neg-mul-1 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   8. associate-*r* 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   9. *-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 75.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-10} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1e-10) (not (<= z 2e-65))) (* z (- 1.0 x)) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e-10) || !(z <= 2e-65)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1d-10)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2d-65))) then
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - x)
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e-10) || !(z <= 2e-65)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1e-10) or not (z <= 2e-65):
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x)
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1e-10) || !(z <= 2e-65))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1e-10) || ~((z <= 2e-65)))
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1e-10], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2e-65]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.00000000000000004e-10 or 1.99999999999999985e-65 < z

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000004e-10 < z < 1.99999999999999985e-65

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 69.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-10} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-65}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 85.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.3e-42) (not (<= x 2.4e-12))) (* x (- y z)) (* z (- 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.3e-42) || !(x <= 2.4e-12)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.3d-42)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.4d-12))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.3e-42) || !(x <= 2.4e-12)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.3e-42) or not (x <= 2.4e-12):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.3e-42) || !(x <= 2.4e-12))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.3e-42) || ~((x <= 2.4e-12)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.3e-42], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.4e-12]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.30000000000000004e-42 or 2.39999999999999987e-12 < x

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 97.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -2.30000000000000004e-42 < x < 2.39999999999999987e-12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.1) (not (<= x 7.2e-12))) (* x (- y z)) (+ z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.1) || !(x <= 7.2e-12)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.1d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.2d-12))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.1) || !(x <= 7.2e-12)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.1) or not (x <= 7.2e-12):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.1) || !(x <= 7.2e-12))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.1) || ~((x <= 7.2e-12)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.1], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7.2e-12]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.10000000000000009 or 7.2e-12 < x

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -2.10000000000000009 < x < 7.2e-12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x + z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-12}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 62.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.15e-42) (* x y) (if (<= x 7.2e-12) z (* x (- z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.15e-42) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 7.2e-12) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.15d-42)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 7.2d-12) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.15e-42) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 7.2e-12) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.15e-42:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 7.2e-12:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.15e-42)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 7.2e-12)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.15e-42)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 7.2e-12)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.15e-42], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 7.2e-12], z, N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.15000000000000002e-42

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.15000000000000002e-42 < x < 7.2e-12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 7.2e-12 < x

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      2. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in 94.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

      5. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

      6. *-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      7. neg-mul-1 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      8. associate-*r* 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

      9. *-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

      10. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

      11. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

      12. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

      14. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

      15. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 59.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z \cdot x} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 59.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 61.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -5.8e-43) (* x y) (if (<= x 1.65e-12) z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.8e-43) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.65e-12) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-5.8d-43)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 1.65d-12) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.8e-43) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.65e-12) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.8e-43:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 1.65e-12:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.8e-43)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 1.65e-12)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.8e-43)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 1.65e-12)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -5.8e-43], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.65e-12], z, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.8000000000000003e-43 or 1.65e-12 < x

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -5.8000000000000003e-43 < x < 1.65e-12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x * (y - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x * (y - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x * Float64(y - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x * (y - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

   2. +-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + 1\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + z\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) + z} \]

   5. +-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

   6. *-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   7. neg-mul-1 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right)} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   8. associate-*r* 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

   9. *-commutative 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(z \cdot -1\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

   10. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z \cdot -1 + y\right)} + z \]

   11. fma-def 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z \cdot -1 + y, z\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + z \cdot -1}, z\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, z\right) \]

   14. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

   15. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right) \cdot x + z} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \]

Alternative 8: 36.7% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

3. Final simplification 37.1%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023222 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))