Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 81.5% → 99.9%
Time: 7.2s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 1.5×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 81.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ -2.0 (- (* z (/ 2.0 y)) (/ t z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (-2.0 / ((z * (2.0 / y)) - (t / z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((-2.0d0) / ((z * (2.0d0 / y)) - (t / z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (-2.0 / ((z * (2.0 / y)) - (t / z)));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (-2.0 / ((z * (2.0 / y)) - (t / z)))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(2.0 / y)) - Float64(t / z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (-2.0 / ((z * (2.0 / y)) - (t / z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(-2.0 / N[(N[(z * N[(2.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 85.6%

    \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]
    2. associate-/l*92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}\right) \]
    4. associate-/l*92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}}\right) \]
    5. distribute-neg-frac92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}} \]
    6. metadata-eval92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}} \]
    7. associate-/l/85.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
    8. div-sub80.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
    9. times-frac93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \frac{z}{z}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    10. *-inverses93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    11. *-rgt-identity93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    12. *-commutative93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}}{y} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    13. associate-*l/93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{y} \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    14. *-commutative93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    15. times-frac99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{y} \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]
    16. *-inverses99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]
    17. *-lft-identity99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}}} \]
  4. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}} \]

Alternative 2: 88.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -20000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 23000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot \frac{-2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -20000000000000.0) (not (<= z 23000000000.0)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (* z (/ -2.0 t)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -20000000000000.0) || !(z <= 23000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * (-2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-20000000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 23000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - (z * ((-2.0d0) / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -20000000000000.0) || !(z <= 23000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * (-2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -20000000000000.0) or not (z <= 23000000000.0):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - (z * (-2.0 / t))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -20000000000000.0) || !(z <= 23000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(z * Float64(-2.0 / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -20000000000000.0) || ~((z <= 23000000000.0)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - (z * (-2.0 / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -20000000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 23000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(z * N[(-2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -20000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 23000000000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - z \cdot \frac{-2}{t}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -2e13 or 2.3e10 < z

    1. Initial program 76.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg76.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/l*89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}\right) \]
      4. associate-/l*89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}}\right) \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}} \]
      6. metadata-eval89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}} \]
      7. associate-/l/76.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      8. div-sub77.0%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      9. times-frac93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \frac{z}{z}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      10. *-inverses93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. *-rgt-identity93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      12. *-commutative93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}}{y} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-*l/93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{y} \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      14. *-commutative93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      15. times-frac99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{y} \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]
      16. *-inverses99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]
      17. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y}{z} + x} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative94.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
      2. mul-1-neg94.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg94.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    6. Simplified94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

    if -2e13 < z < 2.3e10

    1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]
      2. *-commutative95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      3. associate-*r/95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]
      4. div-sub95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}}} \]
      5. *-commutative95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      6. associate-/l*96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{z}{z \cdot 2}}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      7. associate-/r*96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{z}{z}}{2}}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      8. *-inverses96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{\frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      9. metadata-eval96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{\color{blue}{0.5}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      10. *-commutative96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{0.5} - \frac{\color{blue}{t \cdot y}}{z}} \]
      11. associate-*l/99.1%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{0.5} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z} \cdot y}} \]
    3. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{0.5} - \frac{t}{z} \cdot y}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/92.3%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}} \]
      2. associate-/l*92.2%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
    6. Simplified92.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/r/92.2%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{t} \cdot z} \]
    8. Applied egg-rr92.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{t} \cdot z} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification93.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -20000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 23000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot \frac{-2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 88.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 42000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -82000000000000.0) (not (<= z 42000000000.0)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (/ (* -2.0 z) t))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000000000000.0) || !(z <= 42000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((-2.0 * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-82000000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 42000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - (((-2.0d0) * z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -82000000000000.0) || !(z <= 42000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((-2.0 * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -82000000000000.0) or not (z <= 42000000000.0):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - ((-2.0 * z) / t)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -82000000000000.0) || !(z <= 42000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(-2.0 * z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -82000000000000.0) || ~((z <= 42000000000.0)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - ((-2.0 * z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -82000000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 42000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(-2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 42000000000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - \frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -8.2e13 or 4.2e10 < z

    1. Initial program 76.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg76.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/l*89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}\right) \]
      4. associate-/l*89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}}\right) \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}} \]
      6. metadata-eval89.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}} \]
      7. associate-/l/76.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      8. div-sub77.0%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      9. times-frac93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \frac{z}{z}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      10. *-inverses93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. *-rgt-identity93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      12. *-commutative93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}}{y} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-*l/93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{y} \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      14. *-commutative93.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      15. times-frac99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{y} \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]
      16. *-inverses99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]
      17. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y}{z} + x} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative94.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
      2. mul-1-neg94.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg94.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    6. Simplified94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

    if -8.2e13 < z < 4.2e10

    1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]
      2. *-commutative95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      3. associate-*r/95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]
      4. div-sub95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}}} \]
      5. *-commutative95.0%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      6. associate-/l*96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{z}{z \cdot 2}}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      7. associate-/r*96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{z}{z}}{2}}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      8. *-inverses96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{\frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      9. metadata-eval96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{\color{blue}{0.5}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{z}} \]
      10. *-commutative96.5%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{0.5} - \frac{\color{blue}{t \cdot y}}{z}} \]
      11. associate-*l/99.1%

        \[\leadsto x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{0.5} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z} \cdot y}} \]
    3. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - 2 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{z}{0.5} - \frac{t}{z} \cdot y}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/92.3%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}} \]
    6. Simplified92.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification93.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -82000000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 42000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 81.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+85} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2900000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.95e+85) (not (<= z 2900000000.0))) (- x (/ y z)) x))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.95e+85) || !(z <= 2900000000.0)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.95d+85)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2900000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.95e+85) || !(z <= 2900000000.0)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.95e+85) or not (z <= 2900000000.0):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.95e+85) || !(z <= 2900000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.95e+85) || ~((z <= 2900000000.0)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.95e+85], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2900000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+85} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2900000000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -1.95000000000000017e85 or 2.9e9 < z

    1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg72.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/l*87.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative87.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}\right) \]
      4. associate-/l*87.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}}\right) \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac87.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}} \]
      6. metadata-eval87.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}} \]
      7. associate-/l/72.1%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      8. div-sub72.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      9. times-frac91.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \frac{z}{z}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      10. *-inverses91.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. *-rgt-identity91.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      12. *-commutative91.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}}{y} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-*l/91.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{y} \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      14. *-commutative91.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      15. times-frac99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{y} \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]
      16. *-inverses99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]
      17. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y}{z} + x} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative95.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
      2. mul-1-neg95.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]
      3. sub-neg95.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]
    6. Simplified95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

    if -1.95000000000000017e85 < z < 2.9e9

    1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg95.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/l*95.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative95.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}\right) \]
      4. associate-/l*95.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}}\right) \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac95.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}} \]
      6. metadata-eval95.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}} \]
      7. associate-/l/95.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      8. div-sub87.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
      9. times-frac95.1%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \frac{z}{z}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      10. *-inverses95.1%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      11. *-rgt-identity95.1%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      12. *-commutative95.1%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}}{y} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      13. associate-*l/95.1%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{y} \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      14. *-commutative95.1%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
      15. times-frac99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{y} \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]
      16. *-inverses99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]
      17. *-lft-identity99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification85.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+85} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2900000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 74.9% accurate, 17.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 85.6%

    \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]
    2. associate-/l*92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}\right) \]
    4. associate-/l*92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}}\right) \]
    5. distribute-neg-frac92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-2}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}}} \]
    6. metadata-eval92.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-2}}{\frac{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}{y}} \]
    7. associate-/l/85.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
    8. div-sub80.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{y \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}}} \]
    9. times-frac93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \frac{z}{z}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    10. *-inverses93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y} \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    11. *-rgt-identity93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot 2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    12. *-commutative93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}}{y} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    13. associate-*l/93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{y} \cdot z} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    14. *-commutative93.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y}} - \frac{y \cdot t}{y \cdot z}} \]
    15. times-frac99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{y} \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]
    16. *-inverses99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{1} \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]
    17. *-lft-identity99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \color{blue}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{-2}{z \cdot \frac{2}{y} - \frac{t}{z}}} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  5. Final simplification79.4%

    \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023221 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))