Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 11.3s

Alternatives: 20

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * Math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + z) - Float64(z * log(t))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * Math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (((x + y) + z) - (z * math.log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + z) - Float64(z * log(t))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (((x + y) + z) - (z * log(t))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (fma z (- 1.0 (log t)) (fma (+ a -0.5) b y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x + fma(z, (1.0 - log(t)), fma((a + -0.5), b, y));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x + fma(z, Float64(1.0 - log(t)), fma(Float64(a + -0.5), b, y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

   6. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   11. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   13. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   14. unsub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   15. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

   16. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   17. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (+ a -0.5) b (- (+ y (+ x z)) (* z (log t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma((a + -0.5), b, ((y + (x + z)) - (z * log(t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(Float64(a + -0.5), b, Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) - Float64(z * log(t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, \left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)} \]

   3. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, \left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, \left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right)} - z \cdot \log t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, \left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) \]

Alternative 3: 87.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + t_1\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (<= t_1 -2e+155)
     (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ (* a b) (+ x y)))
     (if (<= t_1 2e+130)
       (+ (+ x y) (* z (- 1.0 (log t))))
       (- (+ z t_1) (* z (log t)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155) {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	} else if (t_1 <= 2e+130) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (z + t_1) - (z * log(t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if (t_1 <= (-2d+155)) then
        tmp = ((-0.5d0) * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
    else if (t_1 <= 2d+130) then
        tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    else
        tmp = (z + t_1) - (z * log(t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155) {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	} else if (t_1 <= 2e+130) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (z + t_1) - (z * Math.log(t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -2e+155:
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
	elif t_1 <= 2e+130:
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	else:
		tmp = (z + t_1) - (z * math.log(t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x + y)));
	elseif (t_1 <= 2e+130)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z + t_1) - Float64(z * log(t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155)
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	elseif (t_1 <= 2e+130)
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = (z + t_1) - (z * log(t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -2e+155], N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+130], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -2.00000000000000001e155

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + x\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000001e155 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 2.0000000000000001e130

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right) + \left(y + x\right)} \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e130 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z + x\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 89.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_1 \leq 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (<= t_1 -2e+155)
     (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ (* a b) (+ x y)))
     (if (<= t_1 1e+129) (+ (+ x y) (* z (- 1.0 (log t)))) (+ (+ x y) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155) {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+129) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if (t_1 <= (-2d+155)) then
        tmp = ((-0.5d0) * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
    else if (t_1 <= 1d+129) then
        tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    else
        tmp = (x + y) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155) {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+129) {
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -2e+155:
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
	elif t_1 <= 1e+129:
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	else:
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x + y)));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+129)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + y) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+155)
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+129)
		tmp = (x + y) + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = (x + y) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -2e+155], N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+129], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -2.00000000000000001e155

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + x\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000001e155 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 1e129

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right) + \left(y + x\right)} \]

   if 1e129 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 74.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -1e+99)
   (fma (+ a -0.5) b x)
   (- (+ (* b (- a 0.5)) (+ z y)) (* z (log t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e+99) {
		tmp = fma((a + -0.5), b, x);
	} else {
		tmp = ((b * (a - 0.5)) + (z + y)) - (z * log(t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -1e+99)
		tmp = fma(Float64(a + -0.5), b, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)) + Float64(z + y)) - Float64(z * log(t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+99], N[(N[(a + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -9.9999999999999997e98

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z + x\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 56.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, x\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 56.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, x\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 56.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, x\right) \]

   5. Simplified 56.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, x\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999997e98 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(y + z\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 77.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ t_2 := z \cdot \log t\\ \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x + z\right) + t_1\right) - t_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_1 + \left(z + y\right)\right) - t_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))) (t_2 (* z (log t))))
   (if (<= (+ x y) -5e-91) (- (+ (+ x z) t_1) t_2) (- (+ t_1 (+ z y)) t_2))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double t_2 = z * log(t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-91) {
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_1 + (z + y)) - t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    t_2 = z * log(t)
    if ((x + y) <= (-5d-91)) then
        tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - t_2
    else
        tmp = (t_1 + (z + y)) - t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double t_2 = z * Math.log(t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-91) {
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_1 + (z + y)) - t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	t_2 = z * math.log(t)
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -5e-91:
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - t_2
	else:
		tmp = (t_1 + (z + y)) - t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	t_2 = Float64(z * log(t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -5e-91)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + z) + t_1) - t_2);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_1 + Float64(z + y)) - t_2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	t_2 = z * log(t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -5e-91)
		tmp = ((x + z) + t_1) - t_2;
	else
		tmp = (t_1 + (z + y)) - t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-91], N[(N[(N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$1 + N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -4.99999999999999997e-91

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z + x\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   if -4.99999999999999997e-91 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(y + z\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x + z\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + a \cdot b\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ (+ y (+ x z)) (* a b))) (* z (log t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((-0.5 * b) + ((y + (x + z)) + (a * b))) - (z * log(t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (((-0.5d0) * b) + ((y + (x + z)) + (a * b))) - (z * log(t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((-0.5 * b) + ((y + (x + z)) + (a * b))) - (z * Math.log(t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((-0.5 * b) + ((y + (x + z)) + (a * b))) - (z * math.log(t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(Float64(y + Float64(x + z)) + Float64(a * b))) - Float64(z * log(t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((-0.5 * b) + ((y + (x + z)) + (a * b))) - (z * log(t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y + N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right) + a \cdot b\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t \]

Alternative 8: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(z + \left(x + y\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ z (+ x y)) (* z (log t))) (* b (- a 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((z + (x + y)) - (z * log(t))) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((z + (x + y)) - (z * log(t))) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((z + (x + y)) - (z * Math.log(t))) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((z + (x + y)) - (z * math.log(t))) + (b * (a - 0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(z + Float64(x + y)) - Float64(z * log(t))) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((z + (x + y)) - (z * log(t))) + (b * (a - 0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(z + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

2. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(z + \left(x + y\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 9: 84.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+143} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.2e+143) (not (<= z 9.6e+111)))
   (+ x (* z (- 1.0 (log t))))
   (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ (* a b) (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.2e+143) || !(z <= 9.6e+111)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4.2d+143)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.6d+111))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (1.0d0 - log(t)))
    else
        tmp = ((-0.5d0) * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.2e+143) || !(z <= 9.6e+111)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - Math.log(t)));
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4.2e+143) or not (z <= 9.6e+111):
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - math.log(t)))
	else:
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.2e+143) || !(z <= 9.6e+111))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x + y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4.2e+143) || ~((z <= 9.6e+111)))
		tmp = x + (z * (1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.2e+143], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.6e+111]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.19999999999999975e143 or 9.60000000000000023e111 < z

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -4.19999999999999975e143 < z < 9.60000000000000023e111

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+143} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 81.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.6e+141) (not (<= z 9.6e+111)))
   (* z (- 1.0 (log t)))
   (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ (* a b) (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.6e+141) || !(z <= 9.6e+111)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - log(t));
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.6d+141)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.6d+111))) then
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - log(t))
    else
        tmp = ((-0.5d0) * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.6e+141) || !(z <= 9.6e+111)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - Math.log(t));
	} else {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.6e+141) or not (z <= 9.6e+111):
		tmp = z * (1.0 - math.log(t))
	else:
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.6e+141) || !(z <= 9.6e+111))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - log(t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x + y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.6e+141) || ~((z <= 9.6e+111)))
		tmp = z * (1.0 - log(t));
	else
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.6e+141], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.6e+111]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(1.0 - N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.5999999999999999e141 or 9.60000000000000023e111 < z

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - \log t\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -2.5999999999999999e141 < z < 9.60000000000000023e111

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - \log t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 68.7% accurate, 6.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 50000000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -1e+74) (not (<= t_1 50000000000000.0)))
     (+ x t_1)
     (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+74) || !(t_1 <= 50000000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-1d+74)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 50000000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + t_1
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+74) || !(t_1 <= 50000000000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+74) or not (t_1 <= 50000000000000.0):
		tmp = x + t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+74) || !(t_1 <= 50000000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+74) || ~((t_1 <= 50000000000000.0)))
		tmp = x + t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+74], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 50000000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -9.99999999999999952e73 or 5e13 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 79.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -9.99999999999999952e73 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 5e13

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 50000000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 65.5% accurate, 6.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -1e+184) (not (<= t_1 2e+130))) t_1 (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+184) || !(t_1 <= 2e+130)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((t_1 <= (-1d+184)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 2d+130))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+184) || !(t_1 <= 2e+130)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+184) or not (t_1 <= 2e+130):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+184) || !(t_1 <= 2e+130))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+184) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+130)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+184], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+130]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < -1.00000000000000002e184 or 2.0000000000000001e130 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e184 < (*.f64 (-.f64 a 1/2) b) < 2.0000000000000001e130

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 54.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 57.1% accurate, 8.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq 10^{-174}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(x + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) 1e-174) (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ x (* a b))) (+ y (* b (- a 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= 1e-174) {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = y + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= 1d-174) then
        tmp = ((-0.5d0) * b) + (x + (a * b))
    else
        tmp = y + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= 1e-174) {
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = y + (b * (a - 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= 1e-174:
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = y + (b * (a - 0.5))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= 1e-174)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(x + Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= 1e-174)
		tmp = (-0.5 * b) + (x + (a * b));
	else
		tmp = y + (b * (a - 0.5));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-174], N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < 1e-174

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + x\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 55.4%

      \[\leadsto -0.5 \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x\right)} \]

   if 1e-174 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow2 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      3. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-+r+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right)} - z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate--l+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{y + \left(\left(x + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      6. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      7. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      8. associate-+r+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right)} - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      9. associate--l+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{y + \left(\left(x + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      10. +-commutative 98.7%

          \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{y + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} - z \cdot \log t\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 57.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq 10^{-174}:\\ \;\;\;\;-0.5 \cdot b + \left(x + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 14: 57.1% accurate, 10.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq 10^{-174}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (- a 0.5)))) (if (<= (+ x y) 1e-174) (+ x t_1) (+ y t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= 1e-174) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (a - 0.5d0)
    if ((x + y) <= 1d-174) then
        tmp = x + t_1
    else
        tmp = y + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= 1e-174) {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= 1e-174:
		tmp = x + t_1
	else:
		tmp = y + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= 1e-174)
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (a - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= 1e-174)
		tmp = x + t_1;
	else
		tmp = y + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-174], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < 1e-174

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 55.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b} \]

   if 1e-174 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. pow2 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      3. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + z\right) - z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-+r+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right)} - z \cdot \log t}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      5. associate--l+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{y + \left(\left(x + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      6. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      7. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + z\right) - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      8. associate-+r+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\left(y + \left(x + z\right)\right)} - z \cdot \log t} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      9. associate--l+ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{y + \left(\left(x + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      10. +-commutative 98.7%

          \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{y + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} - z \cdot \log t\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{y + \left(\left(z + x\right) - z \cdot \log t\right)}} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 57.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq 10^{-174}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 15: 78.6% accurate, 10.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (* -0.5 b) (+ (* a b) (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((-0.5d0) * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(-0.5 * b) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x + y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (-0.5 * b) + ((a * b) + (x + y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(-0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + x\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 74.6%

   \[\leadsto -0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x + y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 16: 78.6% accurate, 12.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x y) (* b (- a 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(b * Float64(a - 0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (x + y) + (b * (a - 0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 74.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

3. Final simplification 74.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + b \cdot \left(a - 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 17: 37.2% accurate, 16.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+69}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -6e+25) (* a b) (if (<= a 1.3e+69) x (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6e+25) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (a <= 1.3e+69) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-6d+25)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (a <= 1.3d+69) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6e+25) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (a <= 1.3e+69) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -6e+25:
		tmp = a * b
	elif a <= 1.3e+69:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -6e+25)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (a <= 1.3e+69)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -6e+25)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (a <= 1.3e+69)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -6e+25], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 1.3e+69], x, N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -6.00000000000000011e25 or 1.3000000000000001e69 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -6.00000000000000011e25 < a < 1.3000000000000001e69

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 26.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+69}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 18: 50.0% accurate, 16.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -5e+34) (* a b) (if (<= a 5.8e+168) (+ x y) (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -5e+34) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (a <= 5.8e+168) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-5d+34)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (a <= 5.8d+168) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -5e+34) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (a <= 5.8e+168) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -5e+34:
		tmp = a * b
	elif a <= 5.8e+168:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -5e+34)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (a <= 5.8e+168)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -5e+34)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (a <= 5.8e+168)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -5e+34], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 5.8e+168], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -4.9999999999999998e34 or 5.8e168 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 68.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e34 < a < 5.8e168

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 49.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 19: 28.5% accurate, 37.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -5.2e+34) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+34) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-5.2d+34)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+34) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.2e+34:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.2e+34)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.2e+34)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -5.2e+34], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.19999999999999995e34

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

      13. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      14. unsub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

      15. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

      16. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 38.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.19999999999999995e34 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot b + \left(a \cdot b + \left(y + \left(z + x\right)\right)\right)\right) - z \cdot \log t} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 28.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 20: 21.8% accurate, 115.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + z\right) - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y + \left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right)} \]

   6. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} + \left(z - z \cdot \log t\right)\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - z \cdot \log t\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(z - \color{blue}{\log t \cdot z}\right) + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   9. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-\log t\right) \cdot z\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   10. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right) \cdot z} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   11. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(-\log t\right) + 1\right)} + \left(\left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \left(-\log t\right) + 1, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right)} \]

   13. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 + \left(-\log t\right)}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   14. unsub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{1 - \log t}, \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b + y\right) \]

   15. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a - 0.5, b, y\right)}\right) \]

   16. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a + \left(-0.5\right)}, b, y\right)\right) \]

   17. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + \color{blue}{-0.5}, b, y\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - \log t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a + -0.5, b, y\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 20.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 20.2%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y\right) + \frac{\left(1 - {\log t}^{2}\right) \cdot z}{1 + \log t}\right) + \left(a - 0.5\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  (+ (+ x y) (/ (* (- 1.0 (pow (log t) 2.0)) z) (+ 1.0 (log t))))
  (* (- a 0.5) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - pow(log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + y) + (((1.0d0 - (log(t) ** 2.0d0)) * z) / (1.0d0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - Math.pow(Math.log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + Math.log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + y) + (((1.0 - math.pow(math.log(t), 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + math.log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - (log(t) ^ 2.0)) * z) / Float64(1.0 + log(t)))) + Float64(Float64(a - 0.5) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + y) + (((1.0 - (log(t) ^ 2.0)) * z) / (1.0 + log(t)))) + ((a - 0.5) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(1.0 - N[Power[N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023221 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ (+ (+ x y) (/ (* (- 1.0 (pow (log t) 2.0)) z) (+ 1.0 (log t)))) (* (- a 0.5) b))

  (+ (- (+ (+ x y) z) (* z (log t))) (* (- a 0.5) b)))