Midpoint on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 98.6% → 99.7%

Time: 21.0s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (+ (cos phi1) (* (cos phi2) (cos (- lambda1 lambda2)))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (Math.cos(phi1) + (Math.cos(phi2) * Math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (math.cos(phi1) + (math.cos(phi2) * math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))), Float64(cos(phi1) + Float64(cos(phi2) * cos(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (+ (cos phi1) (* (cos phi2) (cos (- lambda1 lambda2)))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (Math.cos(phi1) + (Math.cos(phi2) * Math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (math.cos(phi1) + (math.cos(phi2) * math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))), Float64(cos(phi1) + Float64(cos(phi2) * cos(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2 + \cos \lambda_2 \cdot \cos \lambda_1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (*
    (cos phi2)
    (- (* (sin lambda1) (cos lambda2)) (* (cos lambda1) (sin lambda2))))
   (+
    (cos phi1)
    (*
     (cos phi2)
     (+ (* (sin lambda1) (sin lambda2)) (* (cos lambda2) (cos lambda1))))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - (cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)) + (cos(lambda2) * cos(lambda1))))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - (cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)) + (cos(lambda2) * cos(lambda1))))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * ((Math.sin(lambda1) * Math.cos(lambda2)) - (Math.cos(lambda1) * Math.sin(lambda2)))), (Math.cos(phi1) + (Math.cos(phi2) * ((Math.sin(lambda1) * Math.sin(lambda2)) + (Math.cos(lambda2) * Math.cos(lambda1))))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * ((math.sin(lambda1) * math.cos(lambda2)) - (math.cos(lambda1) * math.sin(lambda2)))), (math.cos(phi1) + (math.cos(phi2) * ((math.sin(lambda1) * math.sin(lambda2)) + (math.cos(lambda2) * math.cos(lambda1))))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * Float64(Float64(sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - Float64(cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), Float64(cos(phi1) + Float64(cos(phi2) * Float64(Float64(sin(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)) + Float64(cos(lambda2) * cos(lambda1)))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - (cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)) + (cos(lambda2) * cos(lambda1))))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Sin[lambda1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[lambda2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Cos[lambda1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[lambda2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Sin[lambda1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[lambda2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[lambda2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[lambda1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sin-diff 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 + \left(-\cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 + \left(-\cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

5. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cos-diff 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 + \sin \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2 + \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2\right)}} \]

   3. *-commutative 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\cos \lambda_2 \cdot \cos \lambda_1}\right)} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2 + \cos \lambda_2 \cdot \cos \lambda_1\right)}} \]

8. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2 + \cos \lambda_2 \cdot \cos \lambda_1\right)} \]

Alternative 2: 98.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (*
    (cos phi2)
    (- (* (sin lambda1) (cos lambda2)) (* (cos lambda1) (sin lambda2))))
   (+ (cos phi1) (* (cos phi2) (cos (- lambda1 lambda2)))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - (cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - (cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * ((Math.sin(lambda1) * Math.cos(lambda2)) - (Math.cos(lambda1) * Math.sin(lambda2)))), (Math.cos(phi1) + (Math.cos(phi2) * Math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * ((math.sin(lambda1) * math.cos(lambda2)) - (math.cos(lambda1) * math.sin(lambda2)))), (math.cos(phi1) + (math.cos(phi2) * math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * Float64(Float64(sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - Float64(cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), Float64(cos(phi1) + Float64(cos(phi2) * cos(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * ((sin(lambda1) * cos(lambda2)) - (cos(lambda1) * sin(lambda2)))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Sin[lambda1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[lambda2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Cos[lambda1], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[lambda2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sin-diff 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 + \left(-\cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 + \left(-\cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

5. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\sin \lambda_1 \cdot \cos \lambda_2 - \cos \lambda_1 \cdot \sin \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

Alternative 3: 98.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \cos \phi_1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (fma (cos phi2) (cos (- lambda1 lambda2)) (cos phi1)))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), fma(cos(phi2), cos((lambda1 - lambda2)), cos(phi1)));
}

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))), fma(cos(phi2), cos(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), cos(phi1))))
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]

   2. fma-def 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \cos \phi_1\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \cos \phi_1\right)}} \]

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \cos \phi_1\right)} \]

Alternative 4: 98.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (+ (cos phi1) (* (cos phi2) (cos (- lambda1 lambda2)))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (Math.cos(phi1) + (Math.cos(phi2) * Math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (math.cos(phi1) + (math.cos(phi2) * math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))), Float64(cos(phi1) + Float64(cos(phi2) * cos(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

2. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

Alternative 5: 98.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \lambda_2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (+ (cos phi1) (* (cos phi2) (cos lambda2))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos(lambda2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos(lambda2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (Math.cos(phi1) + (Math.cos(phi2) * Math.cos(lambda2))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (math.cos(phi1) + (math.cos(phi2) * math.cos(lambda2))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))), Float64(cos(phi1) + Float64(cos(phi2) * cos(lambda2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(phi1) + (cos(phi2) * cos(lambda2))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[lambda2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

2. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(-\lambda_2\right)}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cos-neg 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \lambda_2}} \]

4. Simplified 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \lambda_2}} \]

5. Final simplification 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \lambda_2} \]

Alternative 6: 82.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ t_1 := \cos \phi_2 \cdot t_0\\ \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{t_0}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+211}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{t_1}{\cos \phi_2 + \cos \phi_1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{t_1}{1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sin (- lambda1 lambda2))) (t_1 (* (cos phi2) t_0)))
   (if (<= phi2 2.25e-13)
     (+ lambda1 (atan2 t_0 (+ (cos phi1) (cos (- lambda2 lambda1)))))
     (if (<= phi2 3.5e+211)
       (+ lambda1 (atan2 t_1 (+ (cos phi2) (cos phi1))))
       (+
        lambda1
        (atan2 t_1 (+ 1.0 (* (cos phi2) (cos (- lambda1 lambda2))))))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = sin((lambda1 - lambda2));
	double t_1 = cos(phi2) * t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13) {
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_0, (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
	} else if (phi2 <= 3.5e+211) {
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_1, (cos(phi2) + cos(phi1)));
	} else {
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_1, (1.0 + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = sin((lambda1 - lambda2))
    t_1 = cos(phi2) * t_0
    if (phi2 <= 2.25d-13) then
        tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_0, (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))))
    else if (phi2 <= 3.5d+211) then
        tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_1, (cos(phi2) + cos(phi1)))
    else
        tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_1, (1.0d0 + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2));
	double t_1 = Math.cos(phi2) * t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13) {
		tmp = lambda1 + Math.atan2(t_0, (Math.cos(phi1) + Math.cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
	} else if (phi2 <= 3.5e+211) {
		tmp = lambda1 + Math.atan2(t_1, (Math.cos(phi2) + Math.cos(phi1)));
	} else {
		tmp = lambda1 + Math.atan2(t_1, (1.0 + (Math.cos(phi2) * Math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))
	t_1 = math.cos(phi2) * t_0
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.25e-13:
		tmp = lambda1 + math.atan2(t_0, (math.cos(phi1) + math.cos((lambda2 - lambda1))))
	elif phi2 <= 3.5e+211:
		tmp = lambda1 + math.atan2(t_1, (math.cos(phi2) + math.cos(phi1)))
	else:
		tmp = lambda1 + math.atan2(t_1, (1.0 + (math.cos(phi2) * math.cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))
	t_1 = Float64(cos(phi2) * t_0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13)
		tmp = Float64(lambda1 + atan(t_0, Float64(cos(phi1) + cos(Float64(lambda2 - lambda1)))));
	elseif (phi2 <= 3.5e+211)
		tmp = Float64(lambda1 + atan(t_1, Float64(cos(phi2) + cos(phi1))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(lambda1 + atan(t_1, Float64(1.0 + Float64(cos(phi2) * cos(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin((lambda1 - lambda2));
	t_1 = cos(phi2) * t_0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13)
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_0, (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
	elseif (phi2 <= 3.5e+211)
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_1, (cos(phi2) + cos(phi1)));
	else
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_1, (1.0 + (cos(phi2) * cos((lambda1 - lambda2)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.25e-13], N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[t$95$0 / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[Cos[N[(lambda2 - lambda1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi2, 3.5e+211], N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[t$95$1 / N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] + N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[t$95$1 / N[(1.0 + N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.25e-13

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 + \left(-\lambda_2\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      2. +-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      3. neg-mul-1 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_2} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      4. neg-mul-1 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_1}\right)\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      7. distribute-neg-in 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(-\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      8. +-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      9. cos-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      10. +-commutative 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      11. mul-1-neg 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      12. unsub-neg 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   4. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      2. pow2 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}\right)}^{2}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      3. *-commutative 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{{\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \phi_2}}\right)}^{2}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 40.9%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \phi_2}\right)}^{2}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   if 2.25e-13 < phi2 < 3.49999999999999996e211

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(-\lambda_2\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cos-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\cos \lambda_2} + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right) + \cos \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \lambda_2\right)} \]

      4. sin-neg 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\sin \lambda_2\right)} \cdot \lambda_1\right) + \cos \lambda_2\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\sin \lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right) + \cos \lambda_2\right)}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around 0 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \phi_2 + \cos \phi_1}} \]

   if 3.49999999999999996e211 < phi2

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \phi_2}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+211}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_2 + \cos \phi_1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 83.1% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{t_0}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot t_0}{\cos \phi_2 + \cos \phi_1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sin (- lambda1 lambda2))))
   (if (<= phi2 2.25e-13)
     (+ lambda1 (atan2 t_0 (+ (cos phi1) (cos (- lambda2 lambda1)))))
     (+ lambda1 (atan2 (* (cos phi2) t_0) (+ (cos phi2) (cos phi1)))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = sin((lambda1 - lambda2));
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13) {
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_0, (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
	} else {
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * t_0), (cos(phi2) + cos(phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = sin((lambda1 - lambda2))
    if (phi2 <= 2.25d-13) then
        tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_0, (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))))
    else
        tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * t_0), (cos(phi2) + cos(phi1)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2));
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13) {
		tmp = lambda1 + Math.atan2(t_0, (Math.cos(phi1) + Math.cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
	} else {
		tmp = lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * t_0), (Math.cos(phi2) + Math.cos(phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.25e-13:
		tmp = lambda1 + math.atan2(t_0, (math.cos(phi1) + math.cos((lambda2 - lambda1))))
	else:
		tmp = lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * t_0), (math.cos(phi2) + math.cos(phi1)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13)
		tmp = Float64(lambda1 + atan(t_0, Float64(cos(phi1) + cos(Float64(lambda2 - lambda1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * t_0), Float64(cos(phi2) + cos(phi1))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin((lambda1 - lambda2));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.25e-13)
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2(t_0, (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
	else
		tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * t_0), (cos(phi2) + cos(phi1)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.25e-13], N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[t$95$0 / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[Cos[N[(lambda2 - lambda1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] + N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.25e-13

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 + \left(-\lambda_2\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      2. +-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      3. neg-mul-1 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_2} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      4. neg-mul-1 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_1}\right)\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      7. distribute-neg-in 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(-\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      8. +-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      9. cos-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      10. +-commutative 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

      11. mul-1-neg 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      12. unsub-neg 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   4. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      2. pow2 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}\right)}^{2}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

      3. *-commutative 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{{\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \phi_2}}\right)}^{2}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 40.9%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \phi_2}\right)}^{2}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   if 2.25e-13 < phi2

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(-\lambda_2\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cos-neg 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\cos \lambda_2} + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right) + \cos \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\sin \left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \lambda_2\right)} \]

      4. sin-neg 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\sin \lambda_2\right)} \cdot \lambda_1\right) + \cos \lambda_2\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\sin \lambda_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right) + \cos \lambda_2\right)}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around 0 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \phi_2 + \cos \phi_1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_2 + \cos \phi_1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 78.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \lambda_2 + \cos \phi_1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2
   (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (+ (cos lambda2) (cos phi1)))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(lambda2) + cos(phi1)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(lambda2) + cos(phi1)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (Math.cos(lambda2) + Math.cos(phi1)));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (math.cos(lambda2) + math.cos(phi1)))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))), Float64(cos(lambda2) + cos(phi1))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), (cos(lambda2) + cos(phi1)));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[lambda2], $MachinePrecision] + N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

2. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 + \left(-\lambda_2\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   2. +-commutative 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   3. neg-mul-1 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_2} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   4. neg-mul-1 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   6. mul-1-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_1}\right)\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   7. distribute-neg-in 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(-\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   8. +-commutative 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   9. cos-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   10. +-commutative 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   11. mul-1-neg 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   12. unsub-neg 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

4. Simplified 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 79.9%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \lambda_2}} \]

6. Final simplification 79.9%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \lambda_2 + \cos \phi_1} \]

Alternative 9: 77.5% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  lambda1
  (atan2 (sin (- lambda1 lambda2)) (+ (cos phi1) (cos (- lambda2 lambda1))))))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2(sin((lambda1 - lambda2)), (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2(sin((lambda1 - lambda2)), (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2(Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2)), (Math.cos(phi1) + Math.cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2(math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2)), (math.cos(phi1) + math.cos((lambda2 - lambda1))))

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)), Float64(cos(phi1) + cos(Float64(lambda2 - lambda1)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2(sin((lambda1 - lambda2)), (cos(phi1) + cos((lambda2 - lambda1))));
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + N[Cos[N[(lambda2 - lambda1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

2. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 + \left(-\lambda_2\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   2. +-commutative 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   3. neg-mul-1 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_2} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   4. neg-mul-1 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   6. mul-1-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_1}\right)\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   7. distribute-neg-in 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(-\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   8. +-commutative 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   9. cos-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   10. +-commutative 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   11. mul-1-neg 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   12. unsub-neg 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

4. Simplified 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 38.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   2. pow2 38.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}\right)}^{2}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   3. *-commutative 38.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{{\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \phi_2}}\right)}^{2}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 38.1%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \phi_2}\right)}^{2}}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 79.4%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\color{blue}{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

8. Final simplification 79.4%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)} \]

Alternative 10: 63.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (+ lambda1 (atan2 (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2))) 2.0)))

C

double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return lambda1 + Math.atan2((Math.cos(phi2) * Math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), 2.0);
}

Python

def code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return lambda1 + math.atan2((math.cos(phi2) * math.sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), 2.0)

Julia

function code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(lambda1 + atan(Float64(cos(phi2) * sin(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2))), 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = lambda1 + atan2((cos(phi2) * sin((lambda1 - lambda2))), 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(lambda1 + N[ArcTan[N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.5%

   \[\lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \phi_1 + \cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

2. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 + \left(-\lambda_2\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   2. +-commutative 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   3. neg-mul-1 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_2} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   4. neg-mul-1 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} + \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   6. mul-1-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\left(-\lambda_2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \lambda_1}\right)\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   7. distribute-neg-in 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(-\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   8. +-commutative 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   9. cos-neg 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \lambda_2\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   10. +-commutative 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

   11. mul-1-neg 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right)}\right) + \cos \phi_1} \]

   12. unsub-neg 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)} + \cos \phi_1} \]

4. Simplified 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + \cos \phi_1}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + \cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + 1}} \]

7. Simplified 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right) + 1}} \]

8. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around 0 65.7%

   \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \left(-\lambda_1\right)} + 1} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cos-neg 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \lambda_1} + 1} \]

10. Simplified 65.7%

    \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{\cos \lambda_1} + 1} \]

11. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 65.5%

    \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

12. Final simplification 65.5%

    \[\leadsto \lambda_1 + \tan^{-1}_* \frac{\cos \phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}{2} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023220 
(FPCore (lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Midpoint on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (+ lambda1 (atan2 (* (cos phi2) (sin (- lambda1 lambda2))) (+ (cos phi1) (* (cos phi2) (cos (- lambda1 lambda2)))))))