Numeric.Log:$clog1p from log-domain-0.10.2.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 1.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.2×

• 44.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x 2.0) (* x x)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(x * x)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x 2.0) (* x x)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(x * x)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(x + 2\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ x 2.0)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * (x + 2.0d0)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(x + 2.0)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(x + 2\right) + y \cdot y \]

Alternative 2: 97.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-54}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.0) (not (<= x 2.05e-54)))
   (+ (* y y) (* x x))
   (+ (* y y) (* x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.0) || !(x <= 2.05e-54)) {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.05d-54))) then
        tmp = (y * y) + (x * x)
    else
        tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.0) || !(x <= 2.05e-54)) {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.0) or not (x <= 2.05e-54):
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x)
	else:
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.0) || !(x <= 2.05e-54))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(x * x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(x * 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.0) || ~((x <= 2.05e-54)))
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x);
	else
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.05e-54]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2 or 2.05e-54 < x

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} + y \cdot y \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

   6. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

   if -2 < x < 2.05e-54

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-54}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 64.0% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-158}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= (* y y) 6.5e-158) (* x 2.0) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * y) <= 6.5e-158) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y * y) <= 6.5d-158) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = y * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * y) <= 6.5e-158) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (y * y) <= 6.5e-158:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = y * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * y) <= 6.5e-158)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * y) <= 6.5e-158)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = y * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision], 6.5e-158], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y y) < 6.49999999999999971e-158

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if 6.49999999999999971e-158 < (*.f64 y y)

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 73.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]

   7. Simplified 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-158}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 67.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot y + x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* y y) (* x 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (y * y) + (x * 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (y * y) + (x * 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(x * 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 62.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

5. Final simplification 62.8%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot y + x \cdot 2 \]

Alternative 5: 20.4% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x 2.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * 2.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 62.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} + y \cdot y \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 19.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 19.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot y + \left(2 \cdot x + x \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* y y) (+ (* 2.0 x) (* x x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (y * y) + ((2.0d0 * x) + (x * x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 * x) + Float64(x * x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023217 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Numeric.Log:$clog1p from log-domain-0.10.2.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ (* y y) (+ (* 2.0 x) (* x x)))

  (+ (+ (* x 2.0) (* x x)) (* y y)))