b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.8%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 1.0×

• 40.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.25e-15) (+ -1.0 (/ m v)) (/ (* m (* (- 1.0 m) (- 1.0 m))) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.25e-15) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.25d-15) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m / v)
    else
        tmp = (m * ((1.0d0 - m) * (1.0d0 - m))) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.25e-15) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.25e-15:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v)
	else:
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.25e-15)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(1.0 - m))) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.25e-15)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	else
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.25e-15], N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2499999999999999e-15

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \left(-1\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot m + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. *-lft-identity 99.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(\color{blue}{m} + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right) \]

      7. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}}\right) \]

      8. *-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   if 2.2499999999999999e-15 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}}{v} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 3: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + ((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m (/ v (- 1.0 m))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0d0 - m))) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / Float64(v / Float64(1.0 - m))) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / N[(v / N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 5: 98.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.45:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.45) (+ -1.0 (/ m v)) (* (+ m -2.0) (* m (/ m v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.45) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.45d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m / v)
    else
        tmp = (m + (-2.0d0)) * (m * (m / v))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.45) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.45:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v)
	else:
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.45)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m + -2.0) * Float64(m * Float64(m / v)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.45)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	else
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.45], N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.4500000000000002

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \left(-1\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

      4. *-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot m + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. *-lft-identity 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(\color{blue}{m} + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right) \]

      7. associate-*l/ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}}\right) \]

      8. *-lft-identity 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   if 2.4500000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

      2. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      3. un-div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 21.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      3. unpow3 21.8%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m}}{v} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]

      5. associate-*r* 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.45:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 98.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.62) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* (+ m -2.0) (* m (/ m v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.62d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (m + (-2.0d0)) * (m * (m / v))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.62:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m + -2.0) * Float64(m * Float64(m / v)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m * (m / v));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.62], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6200000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   if 1.6200000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

      2. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      3. un-div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 21.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      3. unpow3 21.8%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m}}{v} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]

      5. associate-*r* 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 98.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m + -2}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.62) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* (* m m) (/ (+ m -2.0) v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) * ((m + -2.0) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.62d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (m * m) * ((m + (-2.0d0)) / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) * ((m + -2.0) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.62:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (m * m) * ((m + -2.0) / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * m) * Float64(Float64(m + -2.0) / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (m * m) * ((m + -2.0) / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.62], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6200000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   if 1.6200000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

      2. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      3. un-div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 21.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      3. unpow3 21.8%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m}}{v} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]

      5. associate-*r* 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot m}{v}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-2 + m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v}} \]

      4. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m + -2\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l* 98.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m + -2}{\frac{v}{m \cdot m}}} \]

       2. associate-/r/ 98.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m + -2}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)} \]

   12. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m + -2}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m + -2}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 98.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.62) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (/ (* (+ m -2.0) (* m m)) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = ((m + -2.0) * (m * m)) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.62d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = ((m + (-2.0d0)) * (m * m)) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = ((m + -2.0) * (m * m)) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.62:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = ((m + -2.0) * (m * m)) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(m + -2.0) * Float64(m * m)) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = ((m + -2.0) * (m * m)) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.62], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6200000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   if 1.6200000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

      2. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      3. un-div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 21.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} + \frac{{m}^{3}}{v} \]

      3. unpow3 21.8%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m}}{v} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]

      5. associate-*r* 21.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-out 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(-2 + m\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot m}{v}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-2 + m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v}} \]

      4. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(m + -2\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 97.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.6) (+ -1.0 (/ m v)) (* (/ m v) (* m m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.6d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m / v)
    else
        tmp = (m / v) * (m * m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.6:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v)
	else:
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.6)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m * m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.6)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	else
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.6], N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \left(-1\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

      4. *-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot m + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. *-lft-identity 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(\color{blue}{m} + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right) \]

      7. associate-*l/ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}}\right) \]

      8. *-lft-identity 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   if 2.60000000000000009 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \frac{1}{v}} \]

      2. unpow3 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{v} \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      4. div-inv 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 97.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot m}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.6) (+ -1.0 (/ m v)) (/ m (/ v (* m m)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / (m * m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.6d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m / v)
    else
        tmp = m / (v / (m * m))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / (m * m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.6:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v)
	else:
		tmp = m / (v / (m * m))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.6)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / Float64(v / Float64(m * m)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.6)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	else
		tmp = m / (v / (m * m));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.6], N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m / N[(v / N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \left(-1\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

      4. *-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot m + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. *-lft-identity 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(\color{blue}{m} + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right) \]

      7. associate-*l/ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}}\right) \]

      8. *-lft-identity 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   if 2.60000000000000009 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \frac{1}{v}} \]

      2. unpow3 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{v} \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      4. div-inv 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m}{v}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}}{v} \]

      3. associate-/l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot m}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot m}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot m}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 97.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.6) (+ -1.0 (/ m v)) (/ (* m m) (/ v m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.6d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m / v)
    else
        tmp = (m * m) / (v / m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * m) / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.6:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v)
	else:
		tmp = (m * m) / (v / m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.6)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * m) / Float64(v / m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.6)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
	else
		tmp = (m * m) / (v / m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.6], N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \left(-1\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

      4. *-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot m + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. *-lft-identity 98.7%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(\color{blue}{m} + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right) \]

      7. associate-*l/ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}}\right) \]

      8. *-lft-identity 98.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   if 2.60000000000000009 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \frac{1}{v}} \]

      2. unpow3 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{v} \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      4. div-inv 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m}{v}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 62.2% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 3.5e-156) -1.0 (/ m v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.5e-156) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.5d-156) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.5e-156) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.5e-156:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.5e-156)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.5e-156)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.5e-156], -1.0, N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.4999999999999999e-156

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 3.4999999999999999e-156 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \left(-1\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

      3. +-commutative 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

      4. *-commutative 67.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in 67.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot m + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. *-lft-identity 67.8%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(\color{blue}{m} + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right) \]

      7. associate-*l/ 67.9%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}}\right) \]

      8. *-lft-identity 67.9%

         \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 67.9%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around inf 58.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 75.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + \frac{m}{v} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 (/ m v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m / v);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (-1.0d0) + (m / v)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m / v);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0 + (m / v)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0 + (m / v);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m - 1} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \left(-1\right)} \]

   2. metadata-eval 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

   3. +-commutative 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

   4. *-commutative 76.3%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

   5. distribute-rgt-in 76.3%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot m + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

   6. *-lft-identity 76.3%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \left(\color{blue}{m} + \frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right) \]

   7. associate-*l/ 76.4%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot m}{v}}\right) \]

   8. *-lft-identity 76.4%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) \]

6. Simplified 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 76.4%

   \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

8. Final simplification 76.4%

   \[\leadsto -1 + \frac{m}{v} \]

Alternative 14: 27.4% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in v around inf 28.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 28.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 28.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

   3. associate--r- 28.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + m} \]

   4. metadata-eval 28.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + m \]

6. Simplified 28.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + m} \]

7. Final simplification 28.0%

   \[\leadsto m + -1 \]

Alternative 15: 25.0% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

5. Final simplification 25.5%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023217 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))