FastMath dist3

Percentage Accurate: 97.5% → 100.0%

Time: 3.3s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.9×

• 21.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (* d1 d2) (* (+ d3 5.0) d1)) (* d1 32.0)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0d0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0)

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(d1 * d2) + Float64(Float64(d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + Float64(d1 * 32.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(N[(N[(d1 * d2), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(d3 + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * d1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(d1 * 32.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (* d1 d2) (* (+ d3 5.0) d1)) (* d1 32.0)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0d0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0)

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(d1 * d2) + Float64(Float64(d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + Float64(d1 * 32.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = ((d1 * d2) + ((d3 + 5.0) * d1)) + (d1 * 32.0);
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(N[(N[(d1 * d2), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(d3 + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * d1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(d1 * 32.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3) :precision binary64 (* d1 (+ d2 (+ d3 37.0))))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0));
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0))

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(d1 * Float64(d2 + Float64(d3 + 37.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = d1 * (d2 + (d3 + 37.0));
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(d1 * N[(d2 + N[(d3 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

   5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 52.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -310000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-167} \lor \neg \left(d2 \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-197}\right) \land d2 \leq 7.3 \cdot 10^{-211}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= d2 -310000.0)
   (* d1 d2)
   (if (<= d2 -2e-47)
     (* d1 d3)
     (if (or (<= d2 -1.55e-167) (and (not (<= d2 -1.7e-197)) (<= d2 7.3e-211)))
       (* d1 37.0)
       (* d1 d3)))))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -310000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * d2;
	} else if (d2 <= -2e-47) {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	} else if ((d2 <= -1.55e-167) || (!(d2 <= -1.7e-197) && (d2 <= 7.3e-211))) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d2 <= (-310000.0d0)) then
        tmp = d1 * d2
    else if (d2 <= (-2d-47)) then
        tmp = d1 * d3
    else if ((d2 <= (-1.55d-167)) .or. (.not. (d2 <= (-1.7d-197))) .and. (d2 <= 7.3d-211)) then
        tmp = d1 * 37.0d0
    else
        tmp = d1 * d3
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -310000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * d2;
	} else if (d2 <= -2e-47) {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	} else if ((d2 <= -1.55e-167) || (!(d2 <= -1.7e-197) && (d2 <= 7.3e-211))) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d2 <= -310000.0:
		tmp = d1 * d2
	elif d2 <= -2e-47:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	elif (d2 <= -1.55e-167) or (not (d2 <= -1.7e-197) and (d2 <= 7.3e-211)):
		tmp = d1 * 37.0
	else:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d2 <= -310000.0)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d2);
	elseif (d2 <= -2e-47)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	elseif ((d2 <= -1.55e-167) || (!(d2 <= -1.7e-197) && (d2 <= 7.3e-211)))
		tmp = Float64(d1 * 37.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d2 <= -310000.0)
		tmp = d1 * d2;
	elseif (d2 <= -2e-47)
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	elseif ((d2 <= -1.55e-167) || (~((d2 <= -1.7e-197)) && (d2 <= 7.3e-211)))
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	else
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d2, -310000.0], N[(d1 * d2), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[d2, -2e-47], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[d2, -1.55e-167], And[N[Not[LessEqual[d2, -1.7e-197]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[d2, 7.3e-211]]], N[(d1 * 37.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if d2 < -3.1e5

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d2 around inf 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d2 \cdot d1} \]

   if -3.1e5 < d2 < -1.9999999999999999e-47 or -1.55e-167 < d2 < -1.6999999999999999e-197 or 7.29999999999999968e-211 < d2

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around inf 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot d3} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e-47 < d2 < -1.55e-167 or -1.6999999999999999e-197 < d2 < 7.29999999999999968e-211

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{37 \cdot d1} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 60.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot 37} \]

   7. Simplified 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot 37} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -310000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;d2 \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-167} \lor \neg \left(d2 \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-197}\right) \land d2 \leq 7.3 \cdot 10^{-211}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 75.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 16500000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= d3 16500000000000.0) (* d1 (+ d2 37.0)) (* d1 d3)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 16500000000000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d3 <= 16500000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0d0)
    else
        tmp = d1 * d3
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 16500000000000.0) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d3 <= 16500000000000.0:
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0)
	else:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d3 <= 16500000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * Float64(d2 + 37.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d3 <= 16500000000000.0)
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	else
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d3, 16500000000000.0], N[(d1 * N[(d2 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if d3 < 1.65e13

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)} \]

   if 1.65e13 < d3

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around inf 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot d3} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 16500000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 76.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -9:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 37\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= d2 -9.0) (* d1 (+ d2 37.0)) (* d1 (+ d3 37.0))))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -9.0) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d2 <= (-9.0d0)) then
        tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0d0)
    else
        tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d2 <= -9.0) {
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d2 <= -9.0:
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0)
	else:
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d2 <= -9.0)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * Float64(d2 + 37.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * Float64(d3 + 37.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d2 <= -9.0)
		tmp = d1 * (d2 + 37.0);
	else
		tmp = d1 * (d3 + 37.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d2, -9.0], N[(d1 * N[(d2 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * N[(d3 + 37.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if d2 < -9

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)} \]

   if -9 < d2

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(37 + d3\right) \cdot d1} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d2 \leq -9:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 37\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 44.2% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= d3 2.3e-10) (* d1 37.0) (* d1 d3)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 2.3e-10) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (d3 <= 2.3d-10) then
        tmp = d1 * 37.0d0
    else
        tmp = d1 * d3
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	double tmp;
	if (d3 <= 2.3e-10) {
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	} else {
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	tmp = 0
	if d3 <= 2.3e-10:
		tmp = d1 * 37.0
	else:
		tmp = d1 * d3
	return tmp

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (d3 <= 2.3e-10)
		tmp = Float64(d1 * 37.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(d1 * d3);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (d3 <= 2.3e-10)
		tmp = d1 * 37.0;
	else
		tmp = d1 * d3;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := If[LessEqual[d3, 2.3e-10], N[(d1 * 37.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(d1 * d3), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if d3 < 2.30000000000000007e-10

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 32.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{37 \cdot d1} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 32.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot 37} \]

   7. Simplified 32.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot 37} \]

   if 2.30000000000000007e-10 < d3

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

      3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in d3 around inf 74.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot d3} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;d3 \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot 37\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;d1 \cdot d3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 26.7% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ d1 \cdot 37 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3) :precision binary64 (* d1 37.0))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * 37.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = d1 * 37.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * 37.0;
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return d1 * 37.0

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(d1 * 37.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = d1 * 37.0;
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(d1 * 37.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\left(d1 \cdot d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right) \cdot d1\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(d1 \cdot d2 + \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d3 + 5\right)}\right) + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   2. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right)} + d1 \cdot 32 \]

   3. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(\left(d2 + \left(d3 + 5\right)\right) + 32\right)} \]

   4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(d2 + \left(\left(d3 + 5\right) + 32\right)\right)} \]

   5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \color{blue}{\left(d3 + \left(5 + 32\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + \color{blue}{37}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + \left(d3 + 37\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in d3 around 0 64.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot \left(d2 + 37\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in d2 around 0 26.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{37 \cdot d1} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 26.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot 37} \]

7. Simplified 26.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{d1 \cdot 37} \]

8. Final simplification 26.6%

   \[\leadsto d1 \cdot 37 \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ d1 \cdot \left(\left(37 + d3\right) + d2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (d1 d2 d3) :precision binary64 (* d1 (+ (+ 37.0 d3) d2)))

C

double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(d1, d2, d3)
    real(8), intent (in) :: d1
    real(8), intent (in) :: d2
    real(8), intent (in) :: d3
    code = d1 * ((37.0d0 + d3) + d2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double d1, double d2, double d3) {
	return d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2);
}

Python

def code(d1, d2, d3):
	return d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2)

Julia

function code(d1, d2, d3)
	return Float64(d1 * Float64(Float64(37.0 + d3) + d2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(d1, d2, d3)
	tmp = d1 * ((37.0 + d3) + d2);
end

Wolfram

code[d1_, d2_, d3_] := N[(d1 * N[(N[(37.0 + d3), $MachinePrecision] + d2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023217 
(FPCore (d1 d2 d3)
  :name "FastMath dist3"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (* d1 (+ (+ 37.0 d3) d2))

  (+ (+ (* d1 d2) (* (+ d3 5.0) d1)) (* d1 32.0)))