System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.0s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (+ 1.0 (- (log z) z)) y (* x 0.5)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((1.0 + (log(z) - z)), y, (x * 0.5));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(1.0 + Float64(log(z) - z)), y, Float64(x * 0.5))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 + N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * y + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   5. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 2: 75.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 0.5 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-217} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-290}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x 0.5) -5e-217) (not (<= (* x 0.5) 5e-290)))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* z y))
   (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -5e-217) || !((x * 0.5) <= 5e-290)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * 0.5d0) <= (-5d-217)) .or. (.not. ((x * 0.5d0) <= 5d-290))) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (z * y)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 + log(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -5e-217) || !((x * 0.5) <= 5e-290)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + Math.log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * 0.5) <= -5e-217) or not ((x * 0.5) <= 5e-290):
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 + math.log(z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * 0.5) <= -5e-217) || !(Float64(x * 0.5) <= 5e-290))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * 0.5) <= -5e-217) || ~(((x * 0.5) <= 5e-290)))
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -5e-217], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 5e-290]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x 1/2) < -5.0000000000000002e-217 or 5.0000000000000001e-290 < (*.f64 x 1/2)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 79.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 79.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 79.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   if -5.0000000000000002e-217 < (*.f64 x 1/2) < 5.0000000000000001e-290

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \log z + \left(0.5 \cdot x + y\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \log z\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot 0.5 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-217} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-290}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 85.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -115000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+29}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right)\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -115000000000.0) (not (<= y 4.1e+29)))
   (* (+ 1.0 (- (log z) z)) y)
   (- (* x 0.5) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -115000000000.0) || !(y <= 4.1e+29)) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (log(z) - z)) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-115000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.1d+29))) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (log(z) - z)) * y
    else
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (z * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -115000000000.0) || !(y <= 4.1e+29)) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (Math.log(z) - z)) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -115000000000.0) or not (y <= 4.1e+29):
		tmp = (1.0 + (math.log(z) - z)) * y
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -115000000000.0) || !(y <= 4.1e+29))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(log(z) - z)) * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -115000000000.0) || ~((y <= 4.1e+29)))
		tmp = (1.0 + (log(z) - z)) * y;
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -115000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.1e+29]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.15e11 or 4.1000000000000003e29 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\log z - z\right) + 1\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right)\right)} \cdot y \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right)\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -1.15e11 < y < 4.1000000000000003e29

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -115000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+29}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right)\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 85.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log z - z\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + t_0 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 + t_0\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (log z) z)))
   (if (<= y -3.5e+14)
     (+ y (* t_0 y))
     (if (<= y 5.8e+34) (- (* x 0.5) (* z y)) (* (+ 1.0 t_0) y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = log(z) - z;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e+14) {
		tmp = y + (t_0 * y);
	} else if (y <= 5.8e+34) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + t_0) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = log(z) - z
    if (y <= (-3.5d+14)) then
        tmp = y + (t_0 * y)
    else if (y <= 5.8d+34) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (z * y)
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 + t_0) * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = Math.log(z) - z;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e+14) {
		tmp = y + (t_0 * y);
	} else if (y <= 5.8e+34) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + t_0) * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = math.log(z) - z
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.5e+14:
		tmp = y + (t_0 * y)
	elif y <= 5.8e+34:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y)
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 + t_0) * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(log(z) - z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.5e+14)
		tmp = Float64(y + Float64(t_0 * y));
	elseif (y <= 5.8e+34)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_0) * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = log(z) - z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.5e+14)
		tmp = y + (t_0 * y);
	elseif (y <= 5.8e+34)
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	else
		tmp = (1.0 + t_0) * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -3.5e+14], N[(y + N[(t$95$0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 5.8e+34], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -3.5e14

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   if -3.5e14 < y < 5.8000000000000003e34

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 87.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   if 5.8000000000000003e34 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\log z - z\right) + 1\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. +-commutative 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right)\right)} \cdot y \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right)\right) \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + \left(\log z - z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right)\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;\log z \cdot y + \left(y + x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.28) (+ (* (log z) y) (+ y (* x 0.5))) (- (* x 0.5) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (log(z) * y) + (y + (x * 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 0.28d0) then
        tmp = (log(z) * y) + (y + (x * 0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (z * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (Math.log(z) * y) + (y + (x * 0.5));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 0.28:
		tmp = (math.log(z) * y) + (y + (x * 0.5))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(log(z) * y) + Float64(y + Float64(x * 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = (log(z) * y) + (y + (x * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.28], N[(N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 0.28000000000000003

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 1 + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right)} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.5 + y\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right)} + y \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.5, y\right) + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \log z + \left(0.5 \cdot x + y\right)} \]

   if 0.28000000000000003 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;\log z \cdot y + \left(y + x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (log z) (- 1.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0d0 - z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (Math.log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * (math.log(z) + (1.0 - z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(log(z) + Float64(1.0 - z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (log(z) + (1.0 - z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + \left(1 - z\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 75.8% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* z y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (z * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (z * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(z * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (z * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 75.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 75.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

4. Simplified 75.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt-neg-out 75.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

7. Final simplification 75.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - z \cdot y \]

Alternative 8: 61.5% accurate, 18.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 2.6e+21) (* x 0.5) (* z (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.6e+21) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 2.6d+21) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = z * -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.6e+21) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 2.6e+21:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = z * -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.6e+21)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 2.6e+21)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = z * -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2.6e+21], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 2.6e21

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if 2.6e21 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot 0.5 \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} + \log z, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      5. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\left(-z\right) + \log z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z + \left(-z\right)\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\log z - z\right)}, y, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 + \left(\log z - z\right), y, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 74.3%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 40.6% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

3. Final simplification 42.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023215 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))