Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 98.9%

Time: 3.0s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 31.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma x y (fma z t (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(z, t, (a * b)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(x, y, fma(z, t, Float64(a * b)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * y + N[(z * t + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (* a b) (fma x y (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * b) + fma(x, y, (z * t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * b) + fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-def 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

3. Simplified 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) \]

Alternative 3: 76.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-176} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+97}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.3e-176) (not (<= y 4.8e+97)))
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.3e-176) || !(y <= 4.8e+97)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.3d-176)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.8d+97))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.3e-176) || !(y <= 4.8e+97)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.3e-176) or not (y <= 4.8e+97):
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.3e-176) || !(y <= 4.8e+97))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.3e-176) || ~((y <= 4.8e+97)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.3e-176], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.8e+97]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.30000000000000012e-176 or 4.8e97 < y

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + a \cdot b \]

   if -4.30000000000000012e-176 < y < 4.8e97

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.3 \cdot 10^{-176} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+97}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 53.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -1.15e+67) (* a b) (if (<= (* a b) 8e-83) (* z t) (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.15e+67) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 8e-83) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-1.15d+67)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= 8d-83) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.15e+67) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 8e-83) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -1.15e+67:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= 8e-83:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -1.15e+67)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 8e-83)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.15e+67)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 8e-83)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.15e+67], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 8e-83], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -1.1499999999999999e67 or 8.0000000000000003e-83 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -1.1499999999999999e67 < (*.f64 a b) < 8.0000000000000003e-83

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 44.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]

2. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \]

Alternative 6: 67.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b + z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (* a b) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * b) + (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a * b) + (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return (a * b) + (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return (a * b) + (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 65.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b \]

3. Final simplification 65.1%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b + z \cdot t \]

Alternative 7: 35.8% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]

2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 34.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

3. Final simplification 34.4%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023214 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))