SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.4% → 97.7%

Time: 12.8s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z (* y (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, (y * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, Float64(y * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[(y * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.4%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

   3. associate-*l* 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   4. fma-def 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.4%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 85.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-75} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -4.2e-75) (not (<= t 6e-28)))
   (fma z (* y (tanh (/ t y))) x)
   (+ x (* (* z y) (- (/ t y) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -4.2e-75) || !(t <= 6e-28)) {
		tmp = fma(z, (y * tanh((t / y))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * y) * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -4.2e-75) || !(t <= 6e-28))
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(y * tanh(Float64(t / y))), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * y) * Float64(Float64(t / y) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -4.2e-75], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 6e-28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -4.2000000000000002e-75 or 6.00000000000000005e-28 < t

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 9.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 9.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right), x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 9.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 9.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 9.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   6. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   if -4.2000000000000002e-75 < t < 6.00000000000000005e-28

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-75} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 85.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-74} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -7e-74) (not (<= t 1.15e-28)))
   (+ x (* y (* z (tanh (/ t y)))))
   (+ x (* (* z y) (- (/ t y) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -7e-74) || !(t <= 1.15e-28)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * y) * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-7d-74)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1.15d-28))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * y) * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -7e-74) || !(t <= 1.15e-28)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * Math.tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * y) * ((t / y) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -7e-74) or not (t <= 1.15e-28):
		tmp = x + (y * (z * math.tanh((t / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * y) * ((t / y) - math.tanh((x / y))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -7e-74) || !(t <= 1.15e-28))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * y) * Float64(Float64(t / y) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -7e-74) || ~((t <= 1.15e-28)))
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * y) * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -7e-74], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.15e-28]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -7.00000000000000029e-74 or 1.14999999999999993e-28 < t

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 9.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 9.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 9.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      3. div-sub 9.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 9.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. rec-exp 9.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      6. tanh-def-a 90.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 90.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if -7.00000000000000029e-74 < t < 1.14999999999999993e-28

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-74} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-28}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 81.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 3.5e+192) (+ x (* y (* z (tanh (/ t y))))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.5e+192) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3.5d+192) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.5e+192) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * Math.tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.5e+192:
		tmp = x + (y * (z * math.tanh((t / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.5e+192)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.5e+192)
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3.5e+192], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.49999999999999983e192

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 25.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 25.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      3. div-sub 25.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 25.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. rec-exp 25.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      6. tanh-def-a 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.49999999999999983e192 < y

   1. Initial program 82.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 82.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 69.1% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.25e-38) x (fma (- t x) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e-38) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma((t - x), z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.25e-38)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(t - x), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e-38], x, N[(N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.25000000000000008e-38

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.25000000000000008e-38 < y

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 71.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t - x, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 62.5% accurate, 16.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+119} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-29}\right) \land \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+61} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+118}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.25e+119)
         (and (not (<= z 1.4e-29)) (or (<= z 2.8e+61) (not (<= z 2.6e+118)))))
   (* z (- t x))
   x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.25e+119) || (!(z <= 1.4e-29) && ((z <= 2.8e+61) || !(z <= 2.6e+118)))) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.25d+119)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.4d-29)) .and. (z <= 2.8d+61) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.6d+118))) then
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.25e+119) || (!(z <= 1.4e-29) && ((z <= 2.8e+61) || !(z <= 2.6e+118)))) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.25e+119) or (not (z <= 1.4e-29) and ((z <= 2.8e+61) or not (z <= 2.6e+118))):
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.25e+119) || (!(z <= 1.4e-29) && ((z <= 2.8e+61) || !(z <= 2.6e+118))))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.25e+119) || (~((z <= 1.4e-29)) && ((z <= 2.8e+61) || ~((z <= 2.6e+118)))))
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.25e+119], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.4e-29]], $MachinePrecision], Or[LessEqual[z, 2.8e+61], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.6e+118]], $MachinePrecision]]]], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.25e119 or 1.4000000000000001e-29 < z < 2.8000000000000001e61 or 2.60000000000000016e118 < z

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.25e119 < z < 1.4000000000000001e-29 or 2.8000000000000001e61 < z < 2.60000000000000016e118

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+119} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-29}\right) \land \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+61} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+118}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 68.7% accurate, 19.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.26 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - z \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.26e-40) x (+ x (- (* z t) (* z x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.26e-40) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.26d-40) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.26e-40) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.26e-40:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.26e-40)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(z * x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.26e-40)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.26e-40], x, N[(x + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.26e-40

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.26e-40 < y

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 46.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 46.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 46.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot x\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 46.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) - z \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 83.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - x \cdot z\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - z \cdot x\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - z \cdot x\right) \]

   9. Simplified 71.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t - z \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.26 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - z \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 59.6% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-254}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+156}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -1.6e-254) x (if (<= t 4.2e+156) (* x (- 1.0 z)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.6e-254) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 4.2e+156) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-1.6d-254)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (t <= 4.2d+156) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.6e-254) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 4.2e+156) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -1.6e-254:
		tmp = x
	elif t <= 4.2e+156:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -1.6e-254)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 4.2e+156)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -1.6e-254)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 4.2e+156)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -1.6e-254], x, If[LessEqual[t, 4.2e+156], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.6e-254 or 4.19999999999999963e156 < t

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.6e-254 < t < 4.19999999999999963e156

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right) + x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 63.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot x\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - z \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - z \cdot x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-254}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+156}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 69.1% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.25e-38) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e-38) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.25d-38) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e-38) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.25e-38:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.25e-38)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.25e-38)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e-38], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.25000000000000008e-38

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.25000000000000008e-38 < y

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 65.7% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.25e-38) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e-38) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.25d-38) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e-38) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.25e-38:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.25e-38)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.25e-38)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e-38], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.25000000000000008e-38

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.25000000000000008e-38 < y

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 39.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 39.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right), x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 39.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 39.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 39.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 77.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   6. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 60.7% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.4%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

   3. associate-*l* 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   4. fma-def 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 58.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 58.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023214 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))