Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%
Time: 7.1s
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))
double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}
def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)
function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end
code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))
double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}
def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)
function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end
code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229, 1\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (fma x 0.27061 2.30753) (fma x (+ (* x 0.04481) 0.99229) 1.0)) x)))
double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * ((fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(x, ((x * 0.04481) + 0.99229), 1.0)) - x);
}
function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(fma(x, 0.27061, 2.30753) / fma(x, Float64(Float64(x * 0.04481) + 0.99229), 1.0)) - x))
end
code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(x * 0.27061 + 2.30753), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x * N[(N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision] + 0.99229), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229, 1\right)} - x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. fma-def99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
    4. fma-def99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
    5. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    6. fma-def99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-udef99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.9%

    \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
  6. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229, 1\right)} - x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{x \cdot 0.1913510371 + 1.6316775383}{\left(1 + x \cdot 0.99229\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (fma
  x
  -0.70711
  (/
   (+ (* x 0.1913510371) 1.6316775383)
   (+ (+ 1.0 (* x 0.99229)) (* x (* x 0.04481))))))
double code(double x) {
	return fma(x, -0.70711, (((x * 0.1913510371) + 1.6316775383) / ((1.0 + (x * 0.99229)) + (x * (x * 0.04481)))));
}
function code(x)
	return fma(x, -0.70711, Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 0.1913510371) + 1.6316775383) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * 0.99229)) + Float64(x * Float64(x * 0.04481)))))
end
code[x_] := N[(x * -0.70711 + N[(N[(N[(x * 0.1913510371), $MachinePrecision] + 1.6316775383), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(x * 0.99229), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{x \cdot 0.1913510371 + 1.6316775383}{\left(1 + x \cdot 0.99229\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
    2. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-in99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot 0.70711 + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711} \]
    4. distribute-lft-neg-out99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot 0.70711\right)} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]
    5. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-0.70711\right)} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]
    6. metadata-eval99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{-0.70711} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]
    7. metadata-eval99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.70711 \cdot -1\right)} + \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711 \]
    8. fma-def99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.70711 \cdot -1, \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711\right)} \]
    9. metadata-eval99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{-0.70711}, \frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} \cdot 0.70711\right) \]
    10. associate-*l/99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061\right) \cdot 0.70711}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)}}\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-udef99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right) + 1}}\right) \]
    2. fma-udef99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229\right)} + 1}\right) \]
    3. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} + 1}\right) \]
    4. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)}}\right) \]
    5. distribute-lft-in99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.99229 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)\right)}}\right) \]
    6. associate-+r+99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot 0.99229\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)}}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.9%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot 0.99229\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)}}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-udef99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.1913510371 + 1.6316775383}}{\left(1 + x \cdot 0.99229\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr99.9%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.1913510371 + 1.6316775383}}{\left(1 + x \cdot 0.99229\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\right) \]
  8. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{x \cdot 0.1913510371 + 1.6316775383}{\left(1 + x \cdot 0.99229\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481\right)}\right) \]

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ (* x 0.04481) 0.99229)))) x)))
double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.04481) + 0.99229)))) - x);
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * ((x * 0.04481d0) + 0.99229d0)))) - x)
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.04481) + 0.99229)))) - x);
}
def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.04481) + 0.99229)))) - x)
function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(Float64(x * 0.04481) + 0.99229)))) - x))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.04481) + 0.99229)))) - x);
end
code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision] + 0.99229), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229\right)} - x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
  2. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229\right)} - x\right) \]

Alternative 4: 98.4% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot 0.99229} - x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x 0.99229))) x)))
double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * 0.99229d0))) - x)
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
}
def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x)
function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * 0.99229))) - x))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * 0.99229))) - x);
end
code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * 0.99229), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot 0.99229} - x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

    \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{0.99229 \cdot x}} - x\right) \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative98.6%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]
  4. Simplified98.6%

    \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.99229}} - x\right) \]
  5. Final simplification98.6%

    \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot 0.99229} - x\right) \]

Alternative 5: 98.8% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.05)
   (* x -0.70711)
   (if (<= x 1.15) (+ 1.6316775383 (* x -2.134856267379707)) (* x -0.70711))))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.15) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.05d0)) then
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    else if (x <= 1.15d0) then
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0 + (x * (-2.134856267379707d0))
    else
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.15) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.05:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	elif x <= 1.15:
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707)
	else:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	return tmp
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	elseif (x <= 1.15)
		tmp = Float64(1.6316775383 + Float64(x * -2.134856267379707));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	elseif (x <= 1.15)
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	else
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.05], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.15], N[(1.6316775383 + N[(x * -2.134856267379707), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\
\;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -1.05000000000000004 or 1.1499999999999999 < x

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      2. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
      6. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]
    6. Simplified99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

    if -1.05000000000000004 < x < 1.1499999999999999

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      2. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
      6. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2.134856267379707 \cdot x + 1.6316775383} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 98.8% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711 + \frac{4.2702753202410175}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.05)
   (+ (* x -0.70711) (/ 4.2702753202410175 x))
   (if (<= x 1.15) (+ 1.6316775383 (* x -2.134856267379707)) (* x -0.70711))))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = (x * -0.70711) + (4.2702753202410175 / x);
	} else if (x <= 1.15) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.05d0)) then
        tmp = (x * (-0.70711d0)) + (4.2702753202410175d0 / x)
    else if (x <= 1.15d0) then
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0 + (x * (-2.134856267379707d0))
    else
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.05) {
		tmp = (x * -0.70711) + (4.2702753202410175 / x);
	} else if (x <= 1.15) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.05:
		tmp = (x * -0.70711) + (4.2702753202410175 / x)
	elif x <= 1.15:
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707)
	else:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	return tmp
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * -0.70711) + Float64(4.2702753202410175 / x));
	elseif (x <= 1.15)
		tmp = Float64(1.6316775383 + Float64(x * -2.134856267379707));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.05)
		tmp = (x * -0.70711) + (4.2702753202410175 / x);
	elseif (x <= 1.15)
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	else
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.05], N[(N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision] + N[(4.2702753202410175 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.15], N[(1.6316775383 + N[(x * -2.134856267379707), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711 + \frac{4.2702753202410175}{x}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\
\;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if x < -1.05000000000000004

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      2. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
      6. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4.2702753202410175 \cdot \frac{1}{x} + -0.70711 \cdot x} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x + 4.2702753202410175 \cdot \frac{1}{x}} \]
      2. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} + 4.2702753202410175 \cdot \frac{1}{x} \]
      3. associate-*r/99.9%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot -0.70711 + \color{blue}{\frac{4.2702753202410175 \cdot 1}{x}} \]
      4. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot -0.70711 + \frac{\color{blue}{4.2702753202410175}}{x} \]
    6. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711 + \frac{4.2702753202410175}{x}} \]

    if -1.05000000000000004 < x < 1.1499999999999999

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      2. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
      6. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2.134856267379707 \cdot x + 1.6316775383} \]

    if 1.1499999999999999 < x

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      2. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
      6. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative98.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]
    6. Simplified98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.05:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711 + \frac{4.2702753202410175}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.15:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 98.2% accurate, 2.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -3.4) (* x -0.70711) (if (<= x 1.2) 1.6316775383 (* x -0.70711))))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.4) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.2) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-3.4d0)) then
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    else if (x <= 1.2d0) then
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0
    else
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.4) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else if (x <= 1.2) {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.4:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	elif x <= 1.2:
		tmp = 1.6316775383
	else:
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	return tmp
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.4)
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	elseif (x <= 1.2)
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.4)
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	elseif (x <= 1.2)
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	else
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3.4], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.2], 1.6316775383, N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2:\\
\;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -3.39999999999999991 or 1.19999999999999996 < x

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      2. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
      6. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]
    6. Simplified99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

    if -3.39999999999999991 < x < 1.19999999999999996

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      2. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
      6. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification97.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.2:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 50.8% accurate, 19.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1.6316775383 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 1.6316775383)
double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.6316775383d0
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}
def code(x):
	return 1.6316775383
function code(x)
	return 1.6316775383
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.6316775383;
end
code[x_] := 1.6316775383
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1.6316775383
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.9%

    \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.27061 + 2.30753}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    2. fma-def99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
    3. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right) + 1}} - x\right) \]
    4. fma-def99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481, 1\right)}} - x\right) \]
    5. +-commutative99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.04481 + 0.99229}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
    6. fma-def99.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right)}, 1\right)} - x\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.27061, 2.30753\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)} - x\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]
  5. Final simplification48.0%

    \[\leadsto 1.6316775383 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023208 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))