expq3 (problem 3.4.2)

Percentage Accurate: 6.2% → 99.5%

Time: 13.8s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 107.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -2.00000000000000007e154
  2. b = 1.9999999999999999e-154
  3. eps = -1.9999999999999999e-77

Specification

\[-1 < \varepsilon \land \varepsilon < 1\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 6.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\\ t_1 := \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{t_0} + -1\right)}{\left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot a} + -1\right) \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} + -1\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{expm1}\left(t_0\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* eps (+ a b)))
        (t_1
         (/
          (* eps (+ (exp t_0) -1.0))
          (* (+ (exp (* eps a)) -1.0) (+ (exp (* eps b)) -1.0)))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_1 5e-53)))
     (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a))
     (* (expm1 t_0) (/ eps (* (expm1 (* eps a)) (expm1 (* eps b))))))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double t_0 = eps * (a + b);
	double t_1 = (eps * (exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / ((exp((eps * a)) + -1.0) * (exp((eps * b)) + -1.0));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_1 <= 5e-53)) {
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
	} else {
		tmp = expm1(t_0) * (eps / (expm1((eps * a)) * expm1((eps * b))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double t_0 = eps * (a + b);
	double t_1 = (eps * (Math.exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / ((Math.exp((eps * a)) + -1.0) * (Math.exp((eps * b)) + -1.0));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_1 <= 5e-53)) {
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.expm1(t_0) * (eps / (Math.expm1((eps * a)) * Math.expm1((eps * b))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	t_0 = eps * (a + b)
	t_1 = (eps * (math.exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / ((math.exp((eps * a)) + -1.0) * (math.exp((eps * b)) + -1.0))
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -math.inf) or not (t_1 <= 5e-53):
		tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)
	else:
		tmp = math.expm1(t_0) * (eps / (math.expm1((eps * a)) * math.expm1((eps * b))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	t_0 = Float64(eps * Float64(a + b))
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(t_0) + -1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(eps * a)) + -1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(eps * b)) + -1.0)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_1 <= 5e-53))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a));
	else
		tmp = Float64(expm1(t_0) * Float64(eps / Float64(expm1(Float64(eps * a)) * expm1(Float64(eps * b)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(eps * N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(eps * a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(eps * b), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e-53]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(Exp[t$95$0] - 1), $MachinePrecision] * N[(eps / N[(N[(Exp[N[(eps * a), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision] * N[(Exp[N[(eps * b), $MachinePrecision]] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 eps (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a b) eps)) 1)) (*.f64 (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 a eps)) 1) (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 b eps)) 1))) < -inf.0 or 5e-53 < (/.f64 (*.f64 eps (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a b) eps)) 1)) (*.f64 (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 a eps)) 1) (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 b eps)) 1)))

   1. Initial program 0.8%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 0.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 2.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 2.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 14.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 14.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 38.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 38.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 38.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}} \]

   if -inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 eps (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a b) eps)) 1)) (*.f64 (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 a eps)) 1) (-.f64 (exp.f64 (*.f64 b eps)) 1))) < 5e-53

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)} + -1\right)}{\left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot a} + -1\right) \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} + -1\right)} \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)} + -1\right)}{\left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot a} + -1\right) \cdot \left(e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} + -1\right)} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 58.5% accurate, 35.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-139}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a} + \varepsilon \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -6.2e-139) (/ 1.0 b) (+ (/ 1.0 a) (* eps -0.5))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6.2e-139) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / a) + (eps * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-6.2d-139)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 / a) + (eps * (-0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6.2e-139) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / a) + (eps * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -6.2e-139:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 / a) + (eps * -0.5)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -6.2e-139)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(eps * -0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -6.2e-139)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 / a) + (eps * -0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[a, -6.2e-139], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(eps * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -6.1999999999999998e-139

   1. Initial program 12.5%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 12.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 12.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 13.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 13.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 26.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 26.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 60.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if -6.1999999999999998e-139 < a

   1. Initial program 5.7%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. times-frac 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]

      2. expm1-def 17.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      3. *-commutative 17.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      4. expm1-def 18.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      5. *-commutative 18.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right)}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

      6. expm1-def 53.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      7. *-commutative 53.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{b}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 6.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{\varepsilon \cdot a} - 1}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 33.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 33.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \varepsilon}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 33.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 56.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-139}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a} + \varepsilon \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 94.9% accurate, 45.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / b) + (1.0d0 / a)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 7.9%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

   3. expm1-def 9.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 9.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   5. expm1-def 21.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   6. *-commutative 21.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   7. expm1-def 43.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 43.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 43.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 78.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 93.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}} \]

6. Final simplification 93.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \]

Alternative 4: 58.4% accurate, 63.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (if (<= a -1e-135) (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1e-135) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-1d-135)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1e-135) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1e-135:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1e-135)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1e-135)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1e-135], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1e-135

   1. Initial program 12.5%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 12.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 12.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 13.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 13.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 26.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 26.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 60.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if -1e-135 < a

   1. Initial program 5.7%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 5.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

      3. expm1-def 7.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 7.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      5. expm1-def 18.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 18.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

      7. expm1-def 35.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 35.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 35.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 3.1% accurate, 107.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \varepsilon \cdot -0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (* eps -0.5))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return eps * -0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = eps * (-0.5d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return eps * -0.5;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return eps * -0.5

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(eps * -0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = eps * -0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(eps * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 7.9%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. times-frac 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]

   2. expm1-def 20.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

   3. *-commutative 20.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \cdot \frac{e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

   4. expm1-def 21.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

   5. *-commutative 21.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right)}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]

   6. expm1-def 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   7. *-commutative 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 61.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right)}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{b}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 7.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{\varepsilon \cdot a} - 1}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 34.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]

   2. *-commutative 34.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \varepsilon}\right)} \]

7. Simplified 34.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

8. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 47.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{1}{a}} \]

9. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 3.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \varepsilon} \]

10. Final simplification 3.2%

    \[\leadsto \varepsilon \cdot -0.5 \]

Alternative 6: 48.1% accurate, 107.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 a))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = 1.0d0 / a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return 1.0 / a

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(1.0 / a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 1.0 / a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 7.9%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]

   3. expm1-def 9.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 9.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   5. expm1-def 21.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   6. *-commutative 21.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]

   7. expm1-def 43.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]

   8. *-commutative 43.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)} \]

3. Simplified 43.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 47.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

5. Final simplification 47.5%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{a} \]

Developer target: 78.4% accurate, 45.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a + b}{a \cdot b} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ (+ a b) (* a b)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (a + b) / (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (a + b) / (a * b)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(a + b) / Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (a + b) / (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023208 
(FPCore (a b eps)
  :name "expq3 (problem 3.4.2)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (< -1.0 eps) (< eps 1.0))

  :herbie-target
  (/ (+ a b) (* a b))

  (/ (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0)) (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))