HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta

Percentage Accurate: 99.5% → 99.5%
Time: 16.6s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(10^{-5} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq v \land v \leq 109.746574\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{v \cdot v}, \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (fma
  (* (log (fma (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v)) u)) (cbrt (* v v)))
  (cbrt v)
  1.0))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return fmaf((logf(fmaf((1.0f - u), expf((-2.0f / v)), u)) * cbrtf((v * v))), cbrtf(v), 1.0f);
}
function code(u, v)
	return fma(Float32(log(fma(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u), exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)), u)) * cbrt(Float32(v * v))), cbrt(v), Float32(1.0))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{v \cdot v}, \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.4%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1} \]
    2. *-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v} + 1 \]
    3. add-cube-cbrt99.3%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{v} \cdot \sqrt[3]{v}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{v}\right)} + 1 \]
    4. associate-*r*99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{v} \cdot \sqrt[3]{v}\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{v}} + 1 \]
    5. fma-def99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{v} \cdot \sqrt[3]{v}\right), \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right)} \]
    6. +-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{v} \cdot \sqrt[3]{v}\right), \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right) \]
    7. fma-udef99.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{v} \cdot \sqrt[3]{v}\right), \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right) \]
    8. cbrt-unprod99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{v \cdot v}}, \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right) \]
  3. Applied egg-rr99.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{v \cdot v}, \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{v \cdot v}, \sqrt[3]{v}, 1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (fma (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v)) u)))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf(fmaf((1.0f - u), expf((-2.0f / v)), u)));
}
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(fma(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u), exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)), u))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.4%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.4%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right) \cdot v} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} \]
    2. fma-def99.4%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} \]
  4. Simplified99.4%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification99.4%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.4%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Final simplification99.4%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 91.0% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) - \left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \frac{4}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612)
   1.0
   (+
    (-
     (* u (+ (/ 2.0 v) (+ 2.0 (/ 1.3333333333333333 (* v v)))))
     (* (* u u) (+ (/ 2.0 v) (/ 4.0 (* v v)))))
    -1.0)))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = ((u * ((2.0f / v) + (2.0f + (1.3333333333333333f / (v * v))))) - ((u * u) * ((2.0f / v) + (4.0f / (v * v))))) + -1.0f;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.10000000149011612e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = ((u * ((2.0e0 / v) + (2.0e0 + (1.3333333333333333e0 / (v * v))))) - ((u * u) * ((2.0e0 / v) + (4.0e0 / (v * v))))) + (-1.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) / v) + Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(1.3333333333333333) / Float32(v * v))))) - Float32(Float32(u * u) * Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) / v) + Float32(Float32(4.0) / Float32(v * v))))) + Float32(-1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = ((u * ((single(2.0) / v) + (single(2.0) + (single(1.3333333333333333) / (v * v))))) - ((u * u) * ((single(2.0) / v) + (single(4.0) / (v * v))))) + single(-1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) - \left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \frac{4}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) + -1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. expm1-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      4. exp-to-pow99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}} - 1\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
      6. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v} - 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow-to-exp99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      2. expm1-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v\right)}\right) \]
      3. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    5. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) + -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\left(1 + -1 \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(v \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}{{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right) - 1} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg79.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) + -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\left(1 + -1 \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(v \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}{{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(-1\right)} \]
    4. Simplified79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, u \cdot \left(e^{-\frac{-2}{v}} + -1\right), -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\left(1 + \left(-e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)}^{2}}{\frac{{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}{v \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right)}}\right) + -1} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in v around -inf 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{8 \cdot {u}^{2} - 16 \cdot {u}^{2}}{{v}^{2}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right)\right)} + -1 \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-def70.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{8 \cdot {u}^{2} - 16 \cdot {u}^{2}}{{v}^{2}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right)} + -1 \]
      2. distribute-rgt-out--70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{\color{blue}{{u}^{2} \cdot \left(8 - 16\right)}}{{v}^{2}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      3. metadata-eval70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{{u}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{-8}}{{v}^{2}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      4. unpow270.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{{u}^{2} \cdot -8}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      5. times-frac70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \color{blue}{\frac{{u}^{2}}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      6. unpow270.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{\color{blue}{u \cdot u}}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      7. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v}}\right) + -1 \]
      8. mul-1-neg70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v}\right)}\right) + -1 \]
      9. unsub-neg70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) - \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v}}\right) + -1 \]
    7. Simplified70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 2, \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} \cdot \frac{u}{v}\right) - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, u \cdot u, -2 \cdot u\right)}{v}\right)} + -1 \]
    8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + \left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) \cdot u\right)} + -1 \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) \cdot u + -1 \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right)\right)} + -1 \]
      2. mul-1-neg70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(\left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}\right) + -1 \]
      3. unsub-neg70.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) \cdot u - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} + -1 \]
      4. *-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right)} - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
      5. associate-+r+70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
      6. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + \left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right)} - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
      7. associate-*r/70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{v}} + \left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
      8. metadata-eval70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v} + \left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
      9. associate-*r/70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot 1}{{v}^{2}}}\right)\right) - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
      10. metadata-eval70.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
      11. unpow270.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}\right)\right) - \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) \cdot {u}^{2}\right) + -1 \]
    10. Simplified70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) - \left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \frac{4}{v \cdot v}\right)\right)} + -1 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) - \left(u \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \frac{4}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 90.7% accurate, 12.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612)
   1.0
   (+ (* u (+ (/ 2.0 v) (+ 2.0 (/ 1.3333333333333333 (* v v))))) -1.0)))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = (u * ((2.0f / v) + (2.0f + (1.3333333333333333f / (v * v))))) + -1.0f;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.10000000149011612e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (u * ((2.0e0 / v) + (2.0e0 + (1.3333333333333333e0 / (v * v))))) + (-1.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) / v) + Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(1.3333333333333333) / Float32(v * v))))) + Float32(-1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = (u * ((single(2.0) / v) + (single(2.0) + (single(1.3333333333333333) / (v * v))))) + single(-1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) + -1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. expm1-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      4. exp-to-pow99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}} - 1\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
      6. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v} - 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow-to-exp99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      2. expm1-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v\right)}\right) \]
      3. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    5. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) + -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\left(1 + -1 \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(v \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}{{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right) - 1} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg79.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) + -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\left(1 + -1 \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(v \cdot {u}^{2}\right)}{{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right) + \left(-1\right)} \]
    4. Simplified79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, u \cdot \left(e^{-\frac{-2}{v}} + -1\right), -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\left(1 + \left(-e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)}^{2}}{\frac{{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}{v \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right)}}\right) + -1} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in v around -inf 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{8 \cdot {u}^{2} - 16 \cdot {u}^{2}}{{v}^{2}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right)\right)} + -1 \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-def70.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{8 \cdot {u}^{2} - 16 \cdot {u}^{2}}{{v}^{2}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right)} + -1 \]
      2. distribute-rgt-out--70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{\color{blue}{{u}^{2} \cdot \left(8 - 16\right)}}{{v}^{2}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      3. metadata-eval70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{{u}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{-8}}{{v}^{2}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      4. unpow270.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{{u}^{2} \cdot -8}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      5. times-frac70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \color{blue}{\frac{{u}^{2}}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      6. unpow270.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{\color{blue}{u \cdot u}}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v} + \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      7. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v}}\right) + -1 \]
      8. mul-1-neg70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v}\right)}\right) + -1 \]
      9. unsub-neg70.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) - \frac{-2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot {u}^{2}}{v}}\right) + -1 \]
    7. Simplified70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \frac{u \cdot u}{v} \cdot \frac{-8}{v}, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 2, \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} \cdot \frac{u}{v}\right) - \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, u \cdot u, -2 \cdot u\right)}{v}\right)} + -1 \]
    8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) \cdot u} + -1 \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative65.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right)} + -1 \]
      2. associate-+r+65.6%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} + -1 \]
      3. +-commutative65.6%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + \left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right)} + -1 \]
      4. associate-*r/65.6%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{v}} + \left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      5. metadata-eval65.6%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v} + \left(2 + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      6. associate-*r/65.6%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot 1}{{v}^{2}}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      7. metadata-eval65.6%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{\color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
      8. unpow265.6%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}\right)\right) + -1 \]
    10. Simplified65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right)} + -1 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(\frac{2}{v} + \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 90.5% accurate, 14.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(u \cdot \left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) - 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612)
   1.0
   (+ 1.0 (- (* u (+ 2.0 (* 2.0 (/ 1.0 v)))) 2.0))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0f + ((u * (2.0f + (2.0f * (1.0f / v)))) - 2.0f);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.10000000149011612e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = 1.0e0 + ((u * (2.0e0 + (2.0e0 * (1.0e0 / v)))) - 2.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / v)))) - Float32(2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(1.0) + ((u * (single(2.0) + (single(2.0) * (single(1.0) / v)))) - single(2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1 + \left(u \cdot \left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) - 2\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. expm1-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      4. exp-to-pow99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}} - 1\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
      6. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v} - 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow-to-exp99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      2. expm1-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v\right)}\right) \]
      3. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    5. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in v around inf 62.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \left(1 - u\right) + 0.5 \cdot \frac{4 \cdot \left(1 - u\right) + -4 \cdot {\left(1 - u\right)}^{2}}{v}\right)} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 63.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \cdot u - 2\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(u \cdot \left(2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) - 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 90.5% accurate, 16.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) - 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612) 1.0 (+ 1.0 (- (* 2.0 (+ u (/ u v))) 2.0))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0f + ((2.0f * (u + (u / v))) - 2.0f);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.10000000149011612e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = 1.0e0 + ((2.0e0 * (u + (u / v))) - 2.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(u + Float32(u / v))) - Float32(2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(1.0) + ((single(2.0) * (u + (u / v))) - single(2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1 + \left(2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) - 2\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. expm1-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      4. exp-to-pow99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}} - 1\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
      6. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v} - 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow-to-exp99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      2. expm1-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v\right)}\right) \]
      3. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    5. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 70.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) - 2\right)} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in v around inf 63.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot \frac{u}{v}\right)} - 2\right) \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-out63.5%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right)} - 2\right) \]
    5. Simplified63.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right)} - 2\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) - 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 89.9% accurate, 29.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + u \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.4000000059604645) 1.0 (+ -1.0 (* u 2.0))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.4000000059604645f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0f + (u * 2.0f);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.4000000059604645e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (-1.0e0) + (u * 2.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.4000000059604645))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.4000000059604645))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(-1.0) + (u * single(2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-1 + u \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.400000006

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. log1p-expm1-u99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. expm1-udef99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      4. exp-to-pow99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}} - 1\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
      6. fma-udef99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.8%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v} - 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow-to-exp99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      2. expm1-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v\right)}\right) \]
      3. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    5. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.400000006 < v

    1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in v around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(1 - u\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative58.6%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right) \cdot -2} \]
    4. Simplified58.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right) \cdot -2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot u - 1} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification90.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + u \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 89.3% accurate, 68.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 (if (<= v 0.4000000059604645) 1.0 -1.0))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.4000000059604645f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0f;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.4000000059604645e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = -1.0e0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.4000000059604645))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(-1.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.4000000059604645))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(-1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.400000006

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. log1p-expm1-u99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. expm1-udef99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1}\right) \]
      3. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      4. exp-to-pow99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}} - 1\right) \]
      5. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
      6. fma-udef99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v} - 1\right) \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.8%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v} - 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow-to-exp99.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v}} - 1\right) \]
      2. expm1-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v\right)}\right) \]
      3. log1p-expm1-u100.0%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    5. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \cdot v} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.400000006 < v

    1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 49.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification89.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 5.6% accurate, 213.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 -1.0)
float code(float u, float v) {
	return -1.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0e0
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(-1.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(-1.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.4%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 6.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
  3. Final simplification6.9%

    \[\leadsto -1 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023207 
(FPCore (u v)
  :name "HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 1e-5 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 v) (<= v 109.746574)))
  (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))