Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 98.3% → 99.4%

Time: 4.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.7×

• 35.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z + z\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z z (fma x y (* z (+ z z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, z, fma(x, y, (z * (z + z))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, z, fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(z + z))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * z + N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-def 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-lft-out 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + z\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z + z\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z + z\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x y (* z (* z 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, y, (z * (z * 3.0)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(z * 3.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. count-2 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-*l* 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 83.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot z \leq 10^{+143}\right) \land z \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+174}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z z) 5e+18)
         (and (not (<= (* z z) 1e+143)) (<= (* z z) 5e+174)))
   (* x y)
   (* 3.0 (* z z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * z) <= 5e+18) || (!((z * z) <= 1e+143) && ((z * z) <= 5e+174))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((z * z) <= 5d+18) .or. (.not. ((z * z) <= 1d+143)) .and. ((z * z) <= 5d+174)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (z * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * z) <= 5e+18) || (!((z * z) <= 1e+143) && ((z * z) <= 5e+174))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if ((z * z) <= 5e+18) or (not ((z * z) <= 1e+143) and ((z * z) <= 5e+174)):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * z) <= 5e+18) || (!(Float64(z * z) <= 1e+143) && (Float64(z * z) <= 5e+174)))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(z * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((z * z) <= 5e+18) || (~(((z * z) <= 1e+143)) && ((z * z) <= 5e+174)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = 3.0 * (z * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 5e+18], And[N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+143]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 5e+174]]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(3.0 * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 5e18 or 1e143 < (*.f64 z z) < 4.9999999999999997e174

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)}}\right) \]

      2. pow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3}}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

      4. sqrt-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot z} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}}^{2}\right) \]

      5. sqrt-prod 51.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\color{blue}{z} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if 5e18 < (*.f64 z z) < 1e143 or 4.9999999999999997e174 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      2. unpow2 85.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot z + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]

      6. associate-*r* 85.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)}} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r* 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r* 62.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right)}} \]

      5. swap-sqr 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot \left(3 \cdot 3\right)}} \]

      6. pow2 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{{z}^{2}} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot \left(3 \cdot 3\right)} \]

      7. pow2 61.9%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\left({z}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{{z}^{2}}\right) \cdot \left(3 \cdot 3\right)} \]

      8. pow-prod-up 62.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{{z}^{\left(2 + 2\right)}} \cdot \left(3 \cdot 3\right)} \]

      9. metadata-eval 62.0%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt{{z}^{\color{blue}{4}} \cdot \left(3 \cdot 3\right)} \]

      10. metadata-eval 62.0%

          \[\leadsto \sqrt{{z}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{9}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 62.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{z}^{4} \cdot 9}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 62.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{z}^{4}} \cdot \sqrt{9}} \]

      2. sqrt-pow1 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{\left(\frac{4}{2}\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{9} \]

      3. metadata-eval 85.6%

         \[\leadsto {z}^{\color{blue}{2}} \cdot \sqrt{9} \]

      4. pow2 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{9} \]

      5. metadata-eval 85.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{3} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+18} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot z \leq 10^{+143}\right) \land z \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+174}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* z z) (+ (* z z) (+ (* z z) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * z) + ((z * z) + ((z * z) + (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * z) + ((z * z) + ((z * z) + (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * z) + ((z * z) + ((z * z) + (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * z) + ((z * z) + ((z * z) + (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * z) + Float64(Float64(z * z) + Float64(Float64(z * z) + Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * z) + ((z * z) + ((z * z) + (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

2. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 68.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4200000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+73}\right) \land z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z 4200000000.0) (and (not (<= z 4.9e+73)) (<= z 1.9e+87)))
   (* x y)
   (* z (* z 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 4200000000.0) || (!(z <= 4.9e+73) && (z <= 1.9e+87))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= 4200000000.0d0) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.9d+73)) .and. (z <= 1.9d+87)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * (z * 3.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 4200000000.0) || (!(z <= 4.9e+73) && (z <= 1.9e+87))) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= 4200000000.0) or (not (z <= 4.9e+73) and (z <= 1.9e+87)):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= 4200000000.0) || (!(z <= 4.9e+73) && (z <= 1.9e+87)))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * 3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= 4200000000.0) || (~((z <= 4.9e+73)) && (z <= 1.9e+87)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * (z * 3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, 4200000000.0], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.9e+73]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[z, 1.9e+87]]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 4.2e9 or 4.8999999999999999e73 < z < 1.90000000000000006e87

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      4. count-2 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

      7. associate-*l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)}}\right) \]

      2. pow2 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3}}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

      4. sqrt-prod 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot z} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}}^{2}\right) \]

      5. sqrt-prod 38.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\color{blue}{z} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if 4.2e9 < z < 4.8999999999999999e73 or 1.90000000000000006e87 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      2. unpow2 80.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot z + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. metadata-eval 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]

      6. associate-*r* 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4200000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+73}\right) \land z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 98.3% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* z (* z 3.0)) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * (z * 3.0d0)) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * 3.0)) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * (z * 3.0)) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. count-2 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-*l* 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-udef 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y} \]

6. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right) + x \cdot y \]

Alternative 7: 52.1% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. count-2 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot z + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt1-in 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)}\right) \]

   7. associate-*l* 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(2 + 1\right)\right)}\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)}}\right) \]

   2. pow2 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 3\right)}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

   3. associate-*r* 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3}}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

   4. sqrt-prod 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot z} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}}^{2}\right) \]

   5. sqrt-prod 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

   6. add-sqr-sqrt 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, {\left(\color{blue}{z} \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot \sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 56.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

7. Final simplification 56.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y \]

Developer target: 98.3% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((3.0d0 * z) * z) + (y * x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * z) * z) + Float64(y * x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(3.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023207 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x))

  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))